Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #260463
has caused the Debian Bug report #260463,
regarding Installer 20040719.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #260525
has caused the Debian Bug report #260525,
regarding Debian Installer Beta 4 install
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #260553
has caused the Debian Bug report #260553,
regarding i386 installation - OK
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #260625
has caused the Debian Bug report #260625,
regarding (no subject)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #260663
has caused the Debian Bug report #260663,
regarding netinstall (floppy) failure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #260674
has caused the Debian Bug report #260674,
regarding INSTALL REPORT
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #260708
has caused the Debian Bug report #260708,
regarding PowerMac G3 (beige) sarge d-i (20 July 2004) Installation Report
installing quik
to be marked as done.
This means that y
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #260763
has caused the Debian Bug report #260763,
regarding Installed on a PC with root and boot on a logical volume
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #260795
has caused the Debian Bug report #260795,
regarding [d-i] install report
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #261122
has caused the Debian Bug report #261122,
regarding [i386] [20040722] [floppy,network] various problems
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #261140
has caused the Debian Bug report #261140,
regarding d-i failure: i386/Compaq Deskpro 2000 5120
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #261232
has caused the Debian Bug report #261232,
regarding Installation report - s390
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #261376
has caused the Debian Bug report #261376,
regarding hppa testing (sarge) very slow installer
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #261300
has caused the Debian Bug report #261300,
regarding installation-reports: [i386][20040723][netinst] general success
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #261514
has caused the Debian Bug report #261514,
regarding d-i Beta4 in iMac DV+ - several problems
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #261593
has caused the Debian Bug report #261593,
regarding installation-reports
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #261659
has caused the Debian Bug report #261659,
regarding Package: installation-reports
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #261721
has caused the Debian Bug report #261721,
regarding Package: installation-reports
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #261745
has caused the Debian Bug report #261745,
regarding [hend...@pooq.com: Re: Did that. Now no net.]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #261766
has caused the Debian Bug report #261766,
regarding OldWorld PowerPC d-i still some bugs left
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #261899
has caused the Debian Bug report #261899,
regarding [i386] [20040726] [netinst] success, although with some remarks
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #261988
has caused the Debian Bug report #261988,
regarding installation-reports: only minor problems
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #262047
has caused the Debian Bug report #262047,
regarding debian-installer detect HP DL140 netadapter failed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #262070
has caused the Debian Bug report #262070,
regarding failed installation report
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #262071
has caused the Debian Bug report #262071,
regarding Debian-installer install report
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #262293
has caused the Debian Bug report #262293,
regarding INSTALL REPORT
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #262410
has caused the Debian Bug report #262410,
regarding Installer bug report
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #262464
has caused the Debian Bug report #262464,
regarding Failure - HP Vectra 4/66 w P83 OD Processor
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #262549
has caused the Debian Bug report #262549,
regarding installation-reports
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #262568
has caused the Debian Bug report #262568,
regarding installation-reports: [sparc64] [20040731] [netinst] installation
failed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #262714
has caused the Debian Bug report #262714,
regarding (no subject)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #262770
has caused the Debian Bug report #262770,
regarding install-report.template
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #262725
has caused the Debian Bug report #262725,
regarding installation report cobalt qube 2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #262779
has caused the Debian Bug report #262779,
regarding Installer bug report
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #262865
has caused the Debian Bug report #262865,
regarding With two network interfaces after reboot uses the wrong one
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #262874
has caused the Debian Bug report #262874,
regarding Package: installation-reports
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #263077
has caused the Debian Bug report #263077,
regarding Debian Sarge beta 4: installation-reports
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #263338
has caused the Debian Bug report #263338,
regarding install report
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #263554
has caused the Debian Bug report #263554,
regarding installation-reports
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #263963
has caused the Debian Bug report #263963,
regarding installation-reports: d-i beta 4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #264092
has caused the Debian Bug report #264092,
regarding Installation doesnt start, monitor gets multicolored and hangs there
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #264135
has caused the Debian Bug report #264135,
regarding installation-reports: scsi devices detected in wrong order
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #264268
has caused the Debian Bug report #264268,
regarding Debian Installation Report
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #264348
has caused the Debian Bug report #264348,
regarding [i386] [20040805] [CD] does not adequatly describe problem
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #264433
has caused the Debian Bug report #264433,
regarding [hppa] [rc1] [CD] possible hang during boot
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #264703
has caused the Debian Bug report #264703,
regarding "installation-reports - hang with 2.6 kernel on server works module.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #264910
has caused the Debian Bug report #264910,
regarding installation-reports
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #264961
has caused the Debian Bug report #264961,
regarding [sparc] [rc1] [netinst] can not find reiserfs on ramdisk
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #264963
has caused the Debian Bug report #264963,
regarding Installation report for Apple Blue & White G3 400 from netinstall CD
(powerpc, RC1)
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #265044
has caused the Debian Bug report #265044,
regarding installation report
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #265075
has caused the Debian Bug report #265075,
regarding Package: installation-reports
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #265442
has caused the Debian Bug report #265442,
regarding Debian Installer RC 1 on SPARC
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #265442
has caused the Debian Bug report #265442,
regarding Debian Installer RC 1 on SPARCstation IPX
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #266682
has caused the Debian Bug report #266682,
regarding installation report
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #275627
has caused the Debian Bug report #275627,
regarding [sparc][netinst][20041007] failure: sun blade 100
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #288034
has caused the Debian Bug report #288034,
regarding installation-reports
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #289083
has caused the Debian Bug report #289083,
regarding SPARCstn 5 [2004/12/19 daily]: suceeded w/ difficulty
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #309277
has caused the Debian Bug report #309277,
regarding debian-install netinstall sarge amd64
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #310324
has caused the Debian Bug report #310324,
regarding installation report
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #310425
has caused the Debian Bug report #310425,
regarding No keyboard/mouse on SunBlade 150
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #310529
has caused the Debian Bug report #310529,
regarding PowerPC Netinst RC3 CD is missing kernel-image-2.4.27-powerpc
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #310807
has caused the Debian Bug report #310807,
regarding Installing on NVidia nForce2 based PC
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #310869
has caused the Debian Bug report #310869,
regarding installation-reports
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #310939
has caused the Debian Bug report #310939,
regarding installation: mismatch between install kernel and initial boot kernel
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #311081
has caused the Debian Bug report #311081,
regarding debian-testing-i386-businesscard.iso
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #311105
has caused the Debian Bug report #311105,
regarding installation error
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #311136
has caused the Debian Bug report #311136,
regarding Sony Vaio PCG-VX88 Netinst Installation Report
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #311152
has caused the Debian Bug report #311152,
regarding d-i didn't setup network correctly
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #311193
has caused the Debian Bug report #311193,
regarding Install Report for PowerBook 3400c
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #311342
has caused the Debian Bug report #311342,
regarding sarge RC3 finds "no partionable media" with 82801FBM SATA disk
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #311385
has caused the Debian Bug report #311385,
regarding
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #311522
has caused the Debian Bug report #311522,
regarding installation-reports
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #311856
has caused the Debian Bug report #311856,
regarding Install report
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #311824
has caused the Debian Bug report #311824,
regarding Failed 2.6 install from 2005.06.02 snapshot
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #311955
has caused the Debian Bug report #311955,
regarding Package: installation-reports
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #311998
has caused the Debian Bug report #311998,
regarding Debina Installation report
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #312215
has caused the Debian Bug report #312215,
regarding installation-report
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #312372
has caused the Debian Bug report #312372,
regarding [SPARC] Loses network connection while downloading the Release file
from the selected mirror
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #312400
has caused the Debian Bug report #312400,
regarding Boot fails after install
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #312421
has caused the Debian Bug report #312421,
regarding big, installation-reports
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #312489
has caused the Debian Bug report #312489,
regarding installation-reports
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #312651
has caused the Debian Bug report #312651,
regarding Install report
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #312842
has caused the Debian Bug report #312842,
regarding
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #314357
has caused the Debian Bug report #314357,
regarding trouble with VIA RAID array when installing sarge
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #314525
has caused the Debian Bug report #314525,
regarding Fallo copia de un fichero
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #314838
has caused the Debian Bug report #314838,
regarding Installation report (delayed submission from 5-24-05)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #315224
has caused the Debian Bug report #315224,
regarding Debian Installer errors - Sun Blade 1000
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #315231
has caused the Debian Bug report #315231,
regarding Debian Installation on S3HP
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #315553
has caused the Debian Bug report #315553,
regarding Install fails from USB DVD unit
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #315580
has caused the Debian Bug report #315580,
regarding installation-reports: Dell Precision 370 unusable
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #316158
has caused the Debian Bug report #316158,
regarding Installation Report - grub install weirdness
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #316783
has caused the Debian Bug report #316783,
regarding Problems attempting to install Sarge (Hard drive is at /dev/hdg)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #316806
has caused the Debian Bug report #316806,
regarding install mostly worked, but no DHCP, and confusing "kernel modules not
enabled" message
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #315978
has caused the Debian Bug report #315978,
regarding installation-reports: [sparc64] can't net install on v210
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #317125
has caused the Debian Bug report #317125,
regarding install report
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #316929
has caused the Debian Bug report #316929,
regarding Package: installation-reports
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #317174
has caused the Debian Bug report #317174,
regarding Package: installation-reports
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #317248
has caused the Debian Bug report #317248,
regarding install: Sarge install hangs when scanning disks (at 38%)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #317431
has caused the Debian Bug report #317431,
regarding AGNULA DeMuDi instalation error
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #317441
has caused the Debian Bug report #317441,
regarding Package: installation-reports success
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
901 - 1000 of 1656 matches
Mail list logo
