(new) debian-installer-launcher_1.dsc optional utils
(new) debian-installer-launcher_1.tar.gz optional utils
(new) debian-installer-launcher_1_all.deb optional utils
Debian Installer desktop launcher
This is a desktop launcher for Debian Installer images. It is intended to be
used on Debian Live
Accepted:
debian-installer-launcher_1.dsc
to main/d/debian-installer-launcher/debian-installer-launcher_1.dsc
debian-installer-launcher_1.tar.gz
to main/d/debian-installer-launcher/debian-installer-launcher_1.tar.gz
debian-installer-launcher_1_all.deb
to main/d/debian-installer-launcher/de
We're now in August, so it's time for our team of magic reviewers to
work on July 2010 archives.
More details on http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/SpamClean
Note that, out of about 20-25 spams identified for June
month, only 5 have been finally removed from the archive.
It means that we pro
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 7:00 AM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> We're now in August, so it's time for our team of magic reviewers to
> work on July 2010 archives.
>
> More details on http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/SpamClean
>
> Note that, out of about 20-25 spams identified for June
> month, on
On Sunday 01 August 2010, Lee Winter wrote:
> > It means that we probably need a few more DD's to look at signalled
> > spam for the debian-boot mailing list through
>
> I disagree. I believe the above fact indicates that we need a better
> communication mechanism for reviewers, rather than more i
Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
> I also don't think it's a big problem as the review will get done
> eventually. This current focus on getting the spam cleaned out within the
> shortest time possible is unnecessary. d-boot is already by far the
> cleanest list in the archives.
The main
Hello,
Jeremie Koenig, le Wed 23 Jun 2010 06:53:23 +0200, a écrit :
> Currently the default filesystem is ext3 on all systems. However, Hurd
> only supports ext2 and kFreeBSD requires ufs as its root filesystem.
> The attached patch sets a system-specific default, provided none has
> been preseede
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 588761 + pending
Bug #588761 [netcfg] netcfg: please include Hurd support
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
588761: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=588761
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 591103 + pending
Bug #591103 [win32-loader] [INTL:da] Danish translation of the debconf
templates win32-loader
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
591103: http://bugs.debian
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 513917 + pending
Bug #513917 [win32-loader] win32-loader: [INTL:zh_TW] Updated Traditional
Chinese (zh_TW) translation
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
513917: http://bug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 586871 + pending
Bug #586871 [partman-basicfilesystems] partman-basicfilesystems: please include
Hurd support
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
586871: http://bugs.debian.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 588776 + pending
Bug #588776 [base-installer] base-installer: please don't rely on /proc/mounts,
which is not available on Hurd
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
588776: h
Hello,
Jérémie Koenig, le Fri 04 Jun 2010 14:41:34 +0200, a écrit :
> On Hurd, libdebian-installer gets stuck inside the internal_di_exec()
> function. This is caused by the way poll() reports end-of-file, which
> cannot be portably relied on.
>
> The attach patch uses feof() instead of POLLHUP t
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 587208 + pending
Bug #587208 [win32-loader] [INTL:kk] Kazakh translation update
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
587208: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=5
Your message dated Sun, 1 Aug 2010 17:20:21 +0200
with message-id <20100801152021.ga18...@const.famille.thibault.fr>
and subject line Re: debian-installer: build scripts can use outdated packages
has caused the Debian Bug report #586687,
regarding debian-installer: build scripts can use outdated pa
Your message dated Sun, 1 Aug 2010 17:17:55 +0200
with message-id <97b3bb21e64c9df87fd90a4bcedfb11b.squir...@www.phpnet.org>
and subject line Vietnamese translation is updated, but not activated
has caused the Debian Bug report #489218,
regarding win32-loader: [INTL:vi] Vietnamese program translati
Your message dated Sun, 1 Aug 2010 17:21:57 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Dzongkha translation is updated, but not activated
has caused the Debian Bug report #455677,
regarding win32-loader: [INTL:dz] Dzongkha program translation
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 511625 + pending
Bug #511625 [win32-loader] [INTL:ast] Asturian win32-loader translation
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
511625: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.
live-installer_24_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
live-installer_24.dsc
live-installer_24.tar.gz
live-installer_24_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ.
Accepted:
live-installer_24.dsc
to main/l/live-installer/live-installer_24.dsc
live-installer_24.tar.gz
to main/l/live-installer/live-installer_24.tar.gz
live-installer_24_i386.udeb
to main/l/live-installer/live-installer_24_i386.udeb
Override entries for your package:
live-installer_24.
Package: debian-installer
Version: d-i
Severity: minor
I picked the netinst iso and installed Squeeze this weekend into a
virtual machine (VirtualBox) using an 8 GB virtual hard drive. I decided
to use LVM with seperate /home LV and had d-i decide on the LV sizes. d-i
chose the size of the root
Package: debian-installer
Severity: minor
I installed squeeze using the netinst iso within VirtualBox. Late in the
installation process there's some confusion about setting up GRUB. d-i
asks me whether I want to proceed without installing GRUB. If I choose
"No", the question plainly pop up agai
I'd like to invite d-i and debian-cd members who are attending DebConf
to the Constantly Usable Testing BoF, Tuesday at 10:30.
http://penta.debconf.org/dc10_schedule/events/681.en.html
The purpose of the BoF is to finally explore whether it would make sense
to implement the Constantly Usable Test
retitle 591277 2GB is no longer enough for a single root partition
retitle 591277 partman-auto-lvm
thanks
Quoting Jan Heitkötter (usenet...@heitkoetter.net):
> Package: debian-installer
> Version: d-i
> Severity: minor
>
> I picked the netinst iso and installed Squeeze this weekend into a
> virt
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 591277 2GB is no longer enough for a single root partition
Bug #591277 [debian-installer] debian-installer: Root LV created awfully small
Changed Bug title to '2GB is no longer enough for a single root partition' from
'debian-installer: R
Your message dated Sun, 1 Aug 2010 13:46:24 -0400
with message-id <20100801174624.gz24...@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#591278: debian-installer: confusing questions on GRUB
installation
has caused the Debian Bug report #591278,
regarding debian-installer: confusing question
26 matches
Mail list logo
