On Thu 25 Mar, Joey Hess wrote:
> Frans Pop wrote:
> > I disagree with this proposed change. IMO the default group assignments are
> > in line with the purpose of the first user account.
>
> I have three reasons to feel otherwise:
>
> 1. IIRC, the reason for adding the initial user to groups has
Colin,
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:38:07PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 03:55:41PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 06:15:58PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > The API version (libparted-2.1-dev, etc.) was used before upstream
> > > started setting a pr
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:49:40AM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:38:07PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 03:55:41PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 06:15:58PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > > The API version (libparted-2.1-
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:49:40AM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> That still leaves gnu-fdisk (parted team maintained)
Oops; I'll follow up on this.
> and partitioner (mips only, d-boot maintained).
Committed to Subversion, but needs a mips machine to upload it.
gabrielli would do; can you install
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 01:01:06PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > and partitioner (mips only, d-boot maintained).
> Committed to Subversion, but needs a mips machine to upload it.
> gabrielli would do; can you install these build-dependencies, or should
> I go ask DSA?
It seems that DSA is not yet
Hi,
currently, depending on the “sudo mode” which is set during
installation, d-i configures gksu to use sudo mode by default (with a
GConf key).
However, an increasing number of packages use policykit instead of gksu
to obtain root access, so we need some changes on this matter.
Actually there
Am 25.03.2010 23:34, schrieb Josselin Mouette:
> Actually there are two very simple solutions, so it is really a matter
> of what design you prefer.
> 1. (Stolen from Ubuntu) Create a new “admin” group, modify
> policykit to accept self-authentication for all members of the
>
Package: debian-installer
Performing an alpha1 installation in german language, I got an untranslated
dialog related to loading firmware (but I think I have debian-installer
fully translated to german, 100% - no untranslated strings):
When the kernel got installed, I got this message:
(the first
Your message dated Fri, 26 Mar 2010 00:42:21 +0100
with message-id <201003260042.22332.elen...@planet.nl>
and subject line Re: Bug#575456: [d-i squeeze alpha1: L10N] loading firmware:
untranslated dialog
has caused the Debian Bug report #575456,
regarding [d-i squeeze alpha1: L10N] loading firmwar
Hi!
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Speaking as policykit maintainer, I have to say that I generally like
> the idea of such an "admin" group and thus would prefer 1.).
Speaking as a user and sysadmin, I also prefer the group approach.
But I dislike having to add yet anot
hi,
I did a check out of d-i source from
svn://svn.d-i.alioth.debian.org/svn/d-i/trunk/installer
I followed the instructions in installer/build/README
dpkg-checkbuilddeps - done,
when i build d-i i get the following error:
---
E
On 26.03.2010 01:21, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> The amount of groups that a users needs to belong to in order to get
> the best experience from their computer is growing and growing. This
Actually, I personally tried to work against this trend.
The groups plugdev/powerdev/netdev, which primar
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 09:21:58PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > Speaking as policykit maintainer, I have to say that I generally like
> > the idea of such an "admin" group and thus would prefer 1.).
> Speaking as a user and sysadmi
13 matches
Mail list logo
