On Wednesday 17 March 2010, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Once that done, I'll rebuild the following d-i packages against them:
> * cdebconf
> * cdebconf-entropy
> * cdebconf-terminal
> * rootskel-gtk
I've just had a look at how the help dialogs look now, and they are much
better. But they are now
Le mercredi 17 mars 2010 à 02:38 +0100, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> Right now, I spotted a few issues:
> * Missing version bump in Build-Depends, resulting in a dependency of
>libpango1.0-udeb → libcairo-directfb2-udeb. Should be trivial to
>fix.
Emilio fixed this faster than the speed of
On Tuesday 16 March 2010, Hugo Alberto Perlin wrote:
> The first part I mean the part before select what kind of installation,
> like Desktop, Data Base Server, Web Server... The second part is after
> that.
That is still not 100% clear. Are both parts you mean *after* apt-setup, or
is the first
On Tuesday 16 March 2010, kin boster wrote:
> When I configure debian-installer/my_test-udeb/title in templates.
> the warning of syslog is disappear, but the titile line also display
> two exclamation mark( ! ) and lead to another problem: in the main-menu,
> the menu-item of "my_test" display bla
Source: cdebconf
Version: 0.148
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i patch
Hi,
please find attached the patch to switch from DirectFB to X11. See
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2010/03/msg00313.html for the
details.
Thanks for considering.
Mraw,
KiBi.
Index: debian/control
Source: cdebconf-entropy
Version: 0.13
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i patch
Hi,
please find attached the patch to switch from DirectFB to X11. See
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2010/03/msg00313.html for the
details.
Thanks for considering.
Mraw,
KiBi.
Index: debian/control
=
Source: rootskel-gtk
Version: 1.17
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i patch
Hi,
please find attached the patch to switch from DirectFB to X11. See
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2010/03/msg00313.html for the
details.
Thanks for considering.
Mraw,
KiBi.
Index: debian/changelog
===
Source: cdebconf-terminal
Version: 0.6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i patch
Hi,
please find attached the patch to switch from DirectFB to X11. See
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2010/03/msg00313.html for the
details.
Thanks for considering.
Mraw,
KiBi.
Index: debian/control
=
Frans Pop (17/03/2010):
> I've no idea if/how this is possible, but it would be great if you
> could look into it.
Being a standard human being with 24 hours per day, I'm going to say
‘no’ this time, sorry.
> > (I'm going to file bugs against them in a few minutes anyway.)
Oops, looks like I hi
Josselin Mouette (17/03/2010):
> Emilio fixed this faster than the speed of light.
Yep, thanks.
> You mean backporting the 2.30 patches to 2.28 packages?
It could be better phrased “merge the patches in the package versions
they were diffed against”. But that's the idea.
> I guess there’s no h
On Wednesday 17 March 2010, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> please find attached the patch to switch from DirectFB to X11. See
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2010/03/msg00313.html for the
> details.
--- src/lib/debian-installer.d/Makefile (révision 62665)
+++ src/lib/debian-installer.d/Makefile (c
Frans Pop (17/03/2010):
> + S62Xorg
>
> This new file seems to be missing in the patch.
I made the mistake of applying my patches against fresh svn checkouts
of the various components, instead of just keeping on using my git-svn
repository, running svn diff to generate final diffs.
The atta
ttf-cjk-compact_1.15_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ttf-cjk-compact_1.15.dsc
ttf-cjk-compact_1.15.tar.gz
ttf-cjk-compact-udeb_1.15_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de
Accepted:
ttf-cjk-compact-udeb_1.15_all.udeb
to main/t/ttf-cjk-compact/ttf-cjk-compact-udeb_1.15_all.udeb
ttf-cjk-compact_1.15.dsc
to main/t/ttf-cjk-compact/ttf-cjk-compact_1.15.dsc
ttf-cjk-compact_1.15.tar.gz
to main/t/ttf-cjk-compact/ttf-cjk-compact_1.15.tar.gz
Override entries for you
Package: pkgsel
Version: 0.25
Tags:patch
When checking the Ubuntu changes to pkgsel, I noticed this change:
- Divert update-initramfs and call it just once at the end (with
bind-mounted /dev, /proc, and /sys, and a preceding update-dev).
This seem like a good optimization for the instal
Your message dated Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:11:10 +0100
with message-id <20100317141110.gg4...@login1.uio.no>
and subject line Re: udpkg: Avoid error message on first run
has caused the Debian Bug report #318877,
regarding udpkg: Avoid error message on first run
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
[Joey Hess 2005-07-29]
> Hmm, if you look at the callers of read_block(), all of them pass a
> pointer to strdup("") in which is silly if we'll always free it. So
> we could instead just:
I agree, it seem like the proper fix. Perhaps time to commit the fix,
before it is 5 years old. :)
Happy hac
On Wednesday 17 March 2010, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> This seem like a good optimization for the installation time to bring
> over to Debian, making sure update-initramfs is only executed twice
> during the installation instead of several times more
In exactly which scenario would it be execute
[Frans Pop]
> In exactly which scenario would it be executed more than twice?
I expect it to run the triggers several times, once for each block of
packages passed from apt to dpkg, but have not verified that this is
the case. I had a look in the installation log for Debian Edu based
on Squeeze,
On Wednesday 17 March 2010, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> It is possible some of these are from setting up the LTSP chroot
> environment.
Something looks very broken in this example.
Why is initramfs-tools getting set up twice for the same version?
Why is dmsetup getting installed if it is not be
[Frans Pop]
> Something looks very broken in this example.
>
> Why is initramfs-tools getting set up twice for the same version?
No idea. This what made me suspect the cause might be the LTSP
chroot.
> Why is dmsetup getting installed if it is not being used during
> partitioning (in which case
On Wednesday 17 March 2010, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> No idea. This what made me suspect the cause might be the LTSP
> chroot.
Ah. I failed to really comprehend that earlier.
Yes, I guess that could be and that would of course make it separate from
base system installation
> > Why is dmsetu
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:50:04 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/src/lib/debian-installer.d/S62Xorg
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +Xorg -retro -noreset -nolisten tcp &
> +export DISPLAY=:0
This is racy, we probably should do something better here. Might need a
bit of code to do somet
On Wednesday 17 March 2010, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:50:04 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/src/lib/debian-installer.d/S62Xorg
> > @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> > +Xorg -retro -noreset -nolisten tcp &
> > +export DISPLAY=:0
>
> This is racy, we probably should
Julien Cristau, le Wed 17 Mar 2010 21:50:58 +0100, a écrit :
> we should probably not start X if DEBIAN_FRONTEND is not gtk.
Yes, that's needed for proper braille and speech support.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
Package: os-prober
Version: 1.36
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
os-prober does not detect 64bit systems like Fedora 64.
The /usr/lib/os-probes/mounted/90linux-distro script only checks
"$dir"/lib/ld*.so* but to detect Fedora 64 correctly it must check
"$dir"/lib64/ld*.so* too.
After that 1 line
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 574407 pending
Bug #574407 [os-prober] os-prober does not detect 64bit systems like Fedora 64
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
tag 574407 pending
thanks
On Wednesday 17 March 2010, max wrote:
> os-prober does not detect 64bit systems like Fedora 64.
> The /usr/lib/os-probes/mounted/90linux-distro script only checks
> "$dir"/lib/ld*.so* but to detect Fedora 64 correctly it must check
> "$dir"/lib64/ld*.so* too.
I've simpl
hi all:
what (.deb) packages need for installer except .udeb packages ?
in debian installer (lenny), some packages is a hard code write
in it, and hard to find it out
like base-files, perl-base, glibc, linux-image, etc
and some packages are need to use in the
29 matches
Mail list logo
