Package: installation-reports
Boot method: USB Flash
Image version: debian-504-i386-netinst.iso
Date: 03/16/10
Machine: Intel D510MO motherboard
Processor: Intel Atom
Memory: 512MB
Partitions: installation media: USB Flash 2GB, target media: USB Flash 8GB
Output of lspci -knn (or lspci -nn):
Ba
On Tuesday 16 March 2010, Paul Jurczak wrote:
> Comments/Problems:
> I'm experimenting with various distributions and I successfully
> installed Ubuntu, Puppy, Fedora from USB Flash to USB Flash. Debian is
> the first distro, where I had to go USB CD to USB Flash route.
Debian supports all kinds o
[Petter Reinholdtsen]
> Yesterday, I figured out a workaround for this, and I wanted to
> share the solution with the rest of you, and ask if perhaps the
> default behaviour of debian-cd or d-i (hw-detect) should change to
> make this workaround unneeded.
Further testing of this fix proved that it
Please always reply to the BTS, not to the person responding.
On Tuesday 16 March 2010, you wrote:
> Thank you for quick response. Do you mean that copying
> hd-media/boot.img.gz and .iso image to USB Flash will result in
> different installation behavior than preparing USB Flash with LiveUSB
> Cr
On Tuesday 16 March 2010, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Further testing of this fix proved that it is insufficient. hw-detect
> call check-missing-firmware, which look on several devices (disk, USB
> sticks, floppies) for firmware, but fail to look on the CD itself.
> This, I must admit, is very sa
Hi,
On Dienstag, 16. März 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
> An additional issue with non-free firmware is that including it in the way
> you propose would (I think) mean it will get loaded without any prompting
> of the user, which may in some cases violate licence terms.
i thought the same at first, but
[Frans Pop]
> I think the problem with that is that including the firmware on the
> CD in the first place is in contradiction with Debian's current
> policy not to include firmware in the distribution. The current
> firmware support is very explicitly limited to support loading from
> external med
Good morning,
I sent a report to the debian bug reporting system (bug number 573791) but
it seems to not have been taken serious, being shuffled between responsible
owners.
In short, a new net install fails completely everything time due to invalid
signatures.
A mirror install fails every
On Tuesday 16 March 2010, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Dienstag, 16. März 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
> > An additional issue with non-free firmware is that including it in the
> > way you propose would (I think) mean it will get loaded without any
> > prompting of the user, which may in some cases violate
On Tuesday 16 March 2010, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Actually, something causes main-menu to crash if I adjust mountmedia
> to return CD devices too, so I suspect it is better to adjust
> check-missing-firmware to also look in /cdrom/firmware/ for debs.
Probably because the CD is already mounted
Package: hw-detect
Version: 1.75
Tags:patch
User:debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertag: debian-edu
When building a custom CD with firmware packages on the CD, and
symlinked from firmware/ to ../pool/non-free/, the packages are not
found by debian-installer. In fact, as far as I can see, th
[Holger Levsen]
> P.S.: should this be moved to a proper bug?
Yes. Patch for hw-detect submitted in #574116.
Happy hacking,
--
Petter Reinholdtsen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Ar
reassign 573791 installation-reports
tag 573791 unreproducible needinfo
thanks
On Tuesday 16 March 2010, steve clark wrote:
> I sent a report to the debian bug reporting system (bug number 573791)
> but it seems to not have been taken serious, being shuffled between
> responsible owners.
I see it
linux-kernel-di-armel-2.6_1.40_armel.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-armel-2.6_1.40.dsc
linux-kernel-di-armel-2.6_1.40.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.32-3-iop32x-di_1.40_armel.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.32-3-iop32x-di_1.40_armel.udeb
nic-shared-modules-
flash-kernel_2.28_armel.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
flash-kernel_2.28.dsc
flash-kernel_2.28.tar.gz
flash-kernel_2.28_armel.deb
flash-kernel-installer_2.28_armel.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)
--
To
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 573791 installation-reports
Bug #573791 [cdimage.debian.org] apt-get update in Debian 5.04 (lenny) failing
since updates of 2010-03-11
Bug reassigned from package 'cdimage.debian.org' to 'installation-reports'.
> tag 573791 unreproducibl
Accepted:
flash-kernel-installer_2.28_armel.udeb
to main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel-installer_2.28_armel.udeb
flash-kernel_2.28.dsc
to main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel_2.28.dsc
flash-kernel_2.28.tar.gz
to main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel_2.28.tar.gz
flash-kernel_2.28_armel.deb
to main/f
Reject Reasons:
Unknown distribution `unstablle'.
linux-kernel-di-armel-2.6_1.40.dsc: source format '1.0' not allowed in
unstablle (accepted: )
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
c
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 573791 moreinfo
Bug #573791 [installation-reports] apt-get update in Debian 5.04 (lenny)
failing since updates of 2010-03-11
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug trac
> Please note this log is taken just now using:
> debian 5.04 netinst business card image
I have just tried with the same image (for i386), using ftp.nl.d.o as
mirror without any problems. My log looks similar to you, except that I
get good signatures...
From my log:
Mar 16 17:41:08 choose-mirr
linux-kernel-di-armel-2.6_1.40_armel.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-armel-2.6_1.40.dsc
linux-kernel-di-armel-2.6_1.40.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.32-3-iop32x-di_1.40_armel.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.32-3-iop32x-di_1.40_armel.udeb
nic-shared-modules-
(new) ata-modules-2.6.32-3-ixp4xx-di_1.40_armel.udeb extra debian-installer
ATA disk modules
This package contains core ATA disk modules used by both PATA and SATA
disk drivers.
(new) cdrom-core-modules-2.6.32-3-iop32x-di_1.40_armel.udeb standard
debian-installer
CDROM support
This package cont
Frans Pop wrote:
> IMO a proper solution would ensure the licence dialog gets displayed before
> the firmware first gets loaded by the installer.
The only relevant firmware package I can find that prompts with a license is
firmware-ipw2x00. This was discussed in #504668 when they added the licens
Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 March 2010, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > On Dienstag, 16. März 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
> > > An additional issue with non-free firmware is that including it in the
> > > way you propose would (I think) mean it will get loaded without any
> > > prompting of the user, whic
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> The non-free section of the mirror will not be
> enabled automatically, so any updates to the firmware will not be
> installed automatically.
While not relevant to this bug report(?), that is incorrect. See apt-setup
preseeding done by hw-detect.post-base-installer.d/5
Anton Zinoviev :
> On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 02:19:24AM +0100, Piotr Engelking wrote:
>
>> As of version 1.51, keyboard-configuration uses pc105 as the default
>> keyboard model for *_PL locales. Please use pc104 instead, as this the
>> keyboard that is normally used in Poland.
>
> True, but pc104 w
reopen 568638
severity 568638 wishlist
thanks
Anton Zinoviev :
> On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 01:32:27PM +0100, Piotr Engelking wrote:
>
>> Using 'dpkg-reconfigure keyboard-configuration' to switch the keyboard
>> layout to French takes no effect, neither in console nor in X, until
>> '/etc/init.d/con
Package: hw-detect
Severity: important
firmware-ipw2100 has a license prompt that is supposed to be displayed
to the user. If this firmware is loaded by d-i from media supplied by
the user, this prompt is never actually displayed.
In #504668, it's claimed that the license's FAQ allows this,
which
Accepted:
ata-modules-2.6.32-3-ixp4xx-di_1.40_armel.udeb
to
main/l/linux-kernel-di-armel-2.6/ata-modules-2.6.32-3-ixp4xx-di_1.40_armel.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.32-3-iop32x-di_1.40_armel.udeb
to
main/l/linux-kernel-di-armel-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.32-3-iop32x-di_1.40_armel.udeb
cdrom-
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 568638
Bug #568638 {Done: Anton Zinoviev } [keyboard-configuration]
'dpkg-reconfigure keyboard-configuration' takes no immediate effect
> severity 568638 wishlist
Bug #568638 [keyboard-configuration] 'dpkg-reconfigure keyboard-configuratio
On Tuesday 16 March 2010, Joey Hess wrote:
> 3. Provide some way for firmware debs to communicate to d-i that they
> have a license the user needs to see, and have check-missing-firmware
> display these licenses before the firmware is ever used.
This is the option that I have had in the back
tags 243857 + patch
thanks
Hey,
Looks like this bug hasn't seen action for quite a while. It seems like
in the meantime, Ubuntu has fixed this bug. Check out this patch:
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18656164/cdrom-detect-better-flow.patch
This code is in their current version of cdrom-detect a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 243857 + patch
Bug #243857 [cdrom-detect] problem with 2 cds if one is not a d-i cd
Bug #268950 [cdrom-detect] booting of cd for installation fails to mount with a
DVD in another drive.
Added tag(s) patch.
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stoppi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 568475
Bug #568475 {Done: Anton Zinoviev } [keyboard-configuration]
keyboard-configuration: Please use pc104 for *_PL.
> retitle 568475 No need to use pc104 for Brazilian and US layouts
Bug #568475 [keyboard-configuration] keyboard-configu
reopen 568475
retitle 568475 No need to use pc104 for Brazilian and US layouts
thank you
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 08:06:26PM +0100, Piotr Engelking wrote:
>
> Currently, keyboard-configuration defaults to pc104 for the Brazilian
> and US layouts. Shouldn't they perhaps be changed to pc105 as well,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 568638
Bug#568638: 'dpkg-reconfigure keyboard-configuration' takes no immediate effect
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Piotr Engelking
> thank you
Stopp
close 568638
thank you
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 08:07:02PM +0100, Piotr Engelking wrote:
>
> > This is because the only purpose of keyboard-configuration is to create
> > a configuration file in /etc/default/keyboard. It doesn't configure the
> > keyboard in any way.
>
> This is rather confusing
Hello,
I'm trying to install Debian using the NetInst CD and a local repository
created using the apt-mirror app.
The installation with the local repository make the downloads of the first
part well. But in the second part, when it need
5 files, it requires the internet. Anybody knows what could be
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 243857 + pending
Bug #243857 [cdrom-detect] problem with 2 cds if one is not a d-i cd
Bug #268950 [cdrom-detect] booting of cd for installation fails to mount with a
DVD in another drive.
Added tag(s) pending.
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
tags 243857 + pending
thanks
On Tuesday 16 March 2010, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> Looks like this bug hasn't seen action for quite a while. It seems like
> in the meantime, Ubuntu has fixed this bug. Check out this patch:
> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18656164/cdrom-detect-better-flow.patch
Thanks fo
On Tuesday 16 March 2010, Hugo Alberto Perlin wrote:
> I'm trying to install Debian using the NetInst CD and a local repository
> created using the apt-mirror app.
> The installation with the local repository make the downloads of the
> first part well. But in the second part, when it need 5 files,
Hi Joshua,
On Tuesday 16 March 2010, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> Looks like this bug hasn't seen action for quite a while. It seems like
> in the meantime, Ubuntu has fixed this bug. Check out this patch:
>
> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18656164/cdrom-detect-better-flow.patch
Thanks for the pointer.
On Tuesday 16 March 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 March 2010, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> > Looks like this bug hasn't seen action for quite a while. It seems
> > like in the meantime, Ubuntu has fixed this bug. Check out this patch:
> >
> > http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18656164/cdrom-detect-bet
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 March 2010, Hugo Alberto Perlin wrote:
> > I'm trying to install Debian using the NetInst CD and a local repository
> > created using the apt-mirror app.
> > The installation with the local repository make the downloads of the
> >
A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN.
There were no errors during the build process.
The new version of the manual has been uploaded successfully.
A log of the build is available at:
- http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/logs/en.log
===
It is possible to use R
It is now working correctly via both ISPs here; no changes to any
hardware/software/settings.
Ah well, I'm sure there's an explanation to be found somewhere.
Thanks for your time Frans,
Steve
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Hi,
during the past days, I've been busy getting my changes merged into
Debian packages, getting them uploaded, and getting them through
NEW. Besides the X11-related packages I took care of, I should list
udev, cairo, pango1.0, gtk+2.0, vte, and gtk2-engines.
Their respective maintainers were ver
Your message dated Wed, 17 Mar 2010 07:53:20 +0100
with message-id <201003170753.20963.elen...@planet.nl>
and subject line Re: Bug#573791: apt-get update in Debian 5.04 (lenny) failing
since updates of 2010-03-11
has caused the Debian Bug report #573791,
regarding apt-get update in Debian 5.04 (le
48 matches
Mail list logo
