Bug#568839: tasksel: please add readahead-fedora to the desktop task

2010-02-08 Thread Otavio Salvador
Hello, On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 5:13 AM, Raphael Geissert wrote: > No, not really, but I guessed some people would complain if it is > installed on server setups. Indeed. However I think desktop and laptops are suitable for usage with it. > I've no problem with including it on other tasks. My onl

Bug#568839: tasksel: please add readahead-fedora to the desktop task

2010-02-08 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 08 February 2010, Christian PERRIER wrote: > > Given the boot speed improvements provided by readahead-fedora it > > would be convenient if it is installed by default on the desktop task. > > Please add it. > > Why only in the desktop task? IMO if it should be installed by default on all

Bug#568839: tasksel: please add readahead-fedora to the desktop task

2010-02-08 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 08 February 2010, Frans Pop wrote: > On Monday 08 February 2010, Christian PERRIER wrote: > > > Given the boot speed improvements provided by readahead-fedora it > > > would be convenient if it is installed by default on the desktop > > > task. Please add it. > > > > Why only in the deskt

Bug#568839: tasksel: please add readahead-fedora to the desktop task

2010-02-08 Thread Otavio Salvador
Hello, On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Frans Pop wrote: > On Monday 08 February 2010, Christian PERRIER wrote: >> > Given the boot speed improvements provided by readahead-fedora it >> > would be convenient if it is installed by default on the desktop task. >> > Please add it. >> >> Why only in

Re: [RFC] Allow to force or skip Recommends with apt-install

2010-02-08 Thread Otavio Salvador
Hello, On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Frans Pop wrote: [...] > I think with that setup the separation is much clearer than it currently is > and that we'll need less exceptions. It's also a fairly natural separation > as it makes things consistent for the whole base system. > > Thoughts? I full

Re: [RFC] Allow to force or skip Recommends with apt-install

2010-02-08 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 08 February 2010, Otavio Salvador wrote: > I fully agree with you. The number of exceptions are reduced and it is > easy to see the separation when things change. OK > When do you plan to push those changes? Not before the release. I don't think it's important enough to delay that. -

Switching g-i from DirectFB to X11

2010-02-08 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, this is a summary of the needed steps to switch from DirectFB to X11. After some time hacking in the wild, I then looked into providing (possibly) clean patches for each package, which I've just finished. I'd like to once again thank Josselin Mouette for the initial idea, Julien Cristau for h

Bug#568895: user-setup: Remove some of the default groups, they are unused now

2010-02-08 Thread Jean-Christophe Dubacq
Package: user-setup Version: 1.28 Severity: normal There are too many groups for the default user, and some of theme are not used any more : audio cdrom floppy video plugdev netdev powerdev dialout are probably not needed. At least plugdev is no more used, netdev and powerdev are replaced by cons

Re: Switching g-i from DirectFB to X11

2010-02-08 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 08 February 2010, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > this is a summary of the needed steps to switch from DirectFB to X11. > After some time hacking in the wild, I then looked into providing > (possibly) clean patches for each package, which I've just finished. Thanks a lot for this Cyril. I'll ha

Bug#568895: user-setup: Remove some of the default groups, they are unused now

2010-02-08 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 08 February 2010, Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote: > There are too many groups for the default user, and some of theme are > not used any more : audio cdrom floppy video plugdev netdev powerdev > dialout are probably not needed. That's not correct AFAICT. There still exist devices with grou

Bug#568895: user-setup: Remove some of the default groups, they are unused now

2010-02-08 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Feb 08, Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote: > There are too many groups for the default user, and some of theme are not > used any more : audio cdrom floppy video plugdev netdev powerdev dialout > are probably not needed. I am not sure that consolekit is the right tool to manage access to the serial

Bug#568895: user-setup: Remove some of the default groups, they are unused now

2010-02-08 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 08 February 2010, Marco d'Itri wrote: > But users should be in group dip (able to start a remote network > connection) by default, not dialout (with raw access to a serial port). I've fixed that in SVN. Thanks Marco. > FWIW, these are the "standard" groups used by udev on all distributi

Bug#568895: user-setup: Remove some of the default groups, they are unused now

2010-02-08 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 08 February 2010, Frans Pop wrote: > However, user-setup should remain backwards compatible with Lenny. That > could be implemented in different ways [1], but it does mean we cannot > just remove the groups. Also, users only get added to groups that actually exist at the end of the inst

Re: r62202 - trunk/packages/cdebconf/debian

2010-02-08 Thread Otavio Salvador
Hello, On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Author: otavio > Date: Mon Feb  8 19:08:00 2010 > New Revision: 62202 > > Log: > cdebconf-gtk-udeb: limit building for amd64, i386 and powerpc. After doing this change I think we need to decide about how to deal with it. First th

Re: r62202 - trunk/packages/cdebconf/debian

2010-02-08 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 08 February 2010, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Due this problem, cdebconf couldn't migrate to testing since it would > have a broken dependency. The logical fix is to list the architectures > we can support. Just drop the dependency. It's not needed as rootskel-gtk gets included in the ini

Re: r62202 - trunk/packages/cdebconf/debian

2010-02-08 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Frans Pop wrote: > On Monday 08 February 2010, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> Due this problem, cdebconf couldn't migrate to  testing since it would >> have a broken dependency. The logical fix is to list the architectures >> we can support. > > Just drop the dependency.

Re: console-setup v1.28 bug, Debian Lenny

2010-02-08 Thread Anton Zinoviev
On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 12:46:39AM +0300, MicroProgs MicroProgs wrote: > > bug #2 (When [Right ALT] key used to change input language russian/english) > When I use dpkg-reconfigure console-setup to configure [Right ALT] key as > key to change input language, I have a bug. > When I press [Right ALT

Re: console-setup v1.28 bug, Debian Lenny

2010-02-08 Thread Anton Zinoviev
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 01:20:55AM +0300, MicroProgs MicroProgs wrote: > > I install console-setup and configure it: > apt-get install console-setup > dpkg-reconfigure console-setup > > I use "alt + shift" to select input language: english/russian. > The Caps Lock key work in normal mode. > But m

Re: r62202 - trunk/packages/cdebconf/debian

2010-02-08 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 08 February 2010, Otavio Salvador wrote: > This looks strange for me since it is not useful in other arches ATM; Huh? We DO have the pkg-lists configured so there's some variation depending on what type of image we're building you know... > do you belive it is the right way to go? The

Re: r62202 - trunk/packages/cdebconf/debian

2010-02-08 Thread Otavio Salvador
Hello, On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Frans Pop wrote: > On Monday 08 February 2010, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> This looks strange for me since it is not useful in other arches ATM; > > Huh? We DO have the pkg-lists configured so there's some variation > depending on what type of image we're buil

Re: r62202 - trunk/packages/cdebconf/debian

2010-02-08 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 08 February 2010, Otavio Salvador wrote: > I'm not talking about pkg-lists but about dropping the depends. I KNOW > it is going to work but I'm unsure if it is right to drop the depends > line. I know what you're talking about. > In fact, from my POV the right would be to drop rootskel-

Bug#283312: Dar ner

2010-02-08 Thread NOKIA PROMO OFFICE
You have won a prize cobtact:nokiaconnec...@yahoo.co.uk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#317606: I have a list of 788k doctors in America

2010-02-08 Thread darwinian
I have many good quality lists at decent prices. Drop me a line here: ryan.bern...@marketlistgurus.at I'll get you all the details and samples. Send email to disapp...@marketlistgurus.at to ensure no further communication -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org

Bug#568839: tasksel: please add readahead-fedora to the desktop task

2010-02-08 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Montag, 8. Februar 2010, Otavio Salvador wrote: > I don't think it ought to be installed by default. Just desktop and > laptops. btw: same as usplash, IMNSHO :) cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#568967: Debian Squeeze amd64 Installation Successful

2010-02-08 Thread Imtiaz Rahi
Package: installation-reports Severity: minor Just reporting a successful installation on Core2Duo 6300 with 4GB DDR2 RAM -- Package-specific info: Boot method: CD Image version: debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso; build: 2010-02-07 21:47 Date: Machine: Clone PC with Core2Duo Partitions: Bas

SWEET POTATO PIES AND BEAN PIES

2010-02-08 Thread REUBEN FRYAR
BEAN PIES AND SWEET POTATO PIES. WHOLESALE& RETAIL http://www.thebakerycompany.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#568967: marked as done (Debian Squeeze amd64 Installation Successful)

2010-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 9 Feb 2010 06:35:30 +0100 with message-id <20100209053530.gb15...@cc-mykerinos.onera> and subject line Re: Bug#568967: Debian Squeeze amd64 Installation Successful has caused the Debian Bug report #568967, regarding Debian Squeeze amd64 Installation Successful to be marked a

Bug#564441: new version of the proposed patch

2010-02-08 Thread Fred
Hello Frans, Le Wed, 3 Feb 2010 22:54:01 +0100, Frans Pop a écrit : > Hello Fred, > > It took a bit of time, but I think you'll see why. > > I do really like the new functionality. I think we'll need to discuss > the details of the user interface a bit more, but the concept > definitely

Re: Bug#512740: Sparc disk labels broken on LDOM and Parallel installs

2010-02-08 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 10:04:05PM +, Jurij Smakov wrote: > My main concern is whether it affects installer in any adverse way, so > if you could arrange for an installer image to be built with the > modified parted, we could do some testing. I don't have access to a > machine which supports