Bug#568495: [patch] partman-auto-raid/README

2010-02-07 Thread Frans Pop
Hi Vincent, On Friday 05 February 2010, Vincent McIntyre wrote: > I found what I think is a minor error in the partman-auto-raid/README > (the elements of the recipes should be separated by periods, not > commas). Hmmm. I wonder if you read that correctly. It's true that the elements *within* a

Bug#568495: marked as done ([patch] partman-auto-raid/README)

2010-02-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 7 Feb 2010 13:38:44 +0100 with message-id <201002071338.45456.elen...@planet.nl> and subject line Re: Bug#568495: [patch] partman-auto-raid/README has caused the Debian Bug report #568495, regarding [patch] partman-auto-raid/README to be marked as done. This means that you

Keeping support for directfb in g-i?

2010-02-07 Thread Loïc Minier
Hi there, As a followup to KiBi's work on g-i, I independently worked on changing the cairo udebs but instead of switching from directfb to xorg, I kept support for both. KiBi and jcristau didn't seem to find this useful, so I'm asking here whether there's any desire to keep g-i/dire

Re: Keeping support for directfb in g-i?

2010-02-07 Thread Frans Pop
On Sunday 07 February 2010, Loïc Minier wrote: > As a followup to KiBi's work on g-i, I independently worked on changing > the cairo udebs but instead of switching from directfb to xorg, I kept > support for both. > > KiBi and jcristau didn't seem to find this useful, so I'm asking here > whet

Re: Keeping support for directfb in g-i?

2010-02-07 Thread Julien Cristau
> Frans Pop, le Sun 07 Feb 2010 14:59:30 +0100, a écrit : > > I would very much appreciate if KiBi and jcristau would submit their > > proposals to this list in fair detail for review and discussion before > > pushing for changes that affect the installer in the archive. > Nobody pushed anything

Re: Keeping support for directfb in g-i?

2010-02-07 Thread Samuel Thibault
Frans Pop, le Sun 07 Feb 2010 14:59:30 +0100, a écrit : > From what I've seen the current stage is still "getting things to work". It has gotten to "it is working, now cleaning the stuff and reducing size". http://people.debian.org/~kibi/di-x11/2010-02-06/mini.iso > I would very much appreciate i

Processed: Re: Bug#511053: [patch] minor fixes to partman/preseeding notes

2010-02-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 511053 pending Bug #511053 [debian-installer] [patch] minor fixes to partman/preseeding notes Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admini

Bug#511053: [patch] minor fixes to partman/preseeding notes

2010-02-07 Thread Frans Pop
tag 511053 pending thanks On Monday 06 April 2009, Frans Pop wrote: > > - preseed.xml > > it is now possible to preseed multiple disks > > try to enhance preseeding example's comments > > point to partman-auto-recipe.txt on websvn. > > mention lvm-related improvements > >

Re: Keeping support for directfb in g-i?

2010-02-07 Thread Frans Pop
On Sunday 07 February 2010, Julien Cristau wrote: > > Frans Pop, le Sun 07 Feb 2010 14:59:30 +0100, a écrit : > > > I would very much appreciate if KiBi and jcristau would submit their > > > proposals to this list in fair detail for review and discussion > > > before pushing for changes that affect

Re: [RFC] Allow to force or skip Recommends with apt-install

2010-02-07 Thread Frans Pop
On Tuesday 02 February 2010, Frans Pop wrote: > I've looked at the consequences of this and things are quite complex. > IMO our main goal must be to have installations be as consistent as > possible. [...] > The alternative would be to go back to always installing without > Recommends. I've been t

[D-I Manual] Build log for en (07 Feb 2010)

2010-02-07 Thread Felipe Augusto van de Wiel
A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN. There were no errors during the build process. The new version of the manual has been uploaded successfully. A log of the build is available at: - http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/logs/en.log === It is possible to use R

Bug#568839: tasksel: please add readahead-fedora to the desktop task

2010-02-07 Thread Raphael Geissert
Package: tasksel Version: 2.81 Severity: wishlist Hi, Given the boot speed improvements provided by readahead-fedora it would be convenient if it is installed by default on the desktop task. Please add it. Thanks in advance. Cheers, -- Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer www.debian.org - get.

Bug#511625: Asturian NSIS Translations uploaded

2010-02-07 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Marcos (marcoscosta...@gmail.com): > Hi! > Finally the asturian translation was uploaded: http://acurti.es/dsa > Can you import the asturian translation for the win32-loader, please? > Thanks very much for the orientation and help!!! Robert (CC'ed in case you missed Marcos' original mail)

Bug#568839: tasksel: please add readahead-fedora to the desktop task

2010-02-07 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Raphael Geissert (geiss...@debian.org): > Package: tasksel > Version: 2.81 > Severity: wishlist > > Hi, > > Given the boot speed improvements provided by readahead-fedora it would be > convenient if it is installed by default on the desktop task. Please add it. Why only in the desktop

Bug#568839: tasksel: please add readahead-fedora to the desktop task

2010-02-07 Thread Raphael Geissert
On 7 February 2010 23:58, Christian PERRIER wrote: > Quoting Raphael Geissert (geiss...@debian.org): >> Package: tasksel >> Version: 2.81 >> Severity: wishlist >> >> Hi, >> >> Given the boot speed improvements provided by readahead-fedora it would be >> convenient if it is installed by default on