Hi all!
I'm new on the list so I hope my question is not stupid and I'm asking
it in the good list.
I have Sid installed on my computer and I would like to know how to keep
my base system (~prequired, ~pimportant, ~pstandard) always clean and up
to date automatically: if package A is no longer ne
On Wednesday 27 January 2010, Geek87 wrote:
> I also would like to have it working similarly for the tasks: for
> example if I have a task "Mail server" installed depending on Sendmail
> and that the new version of this task now depends on Postfix, I would
> like Sendmail to be automatically remove
Hello,
I am wondering what netcfg-static is good for. Looks like it is an (outdated)
subset of the more generic netcfg. Unfortunately, even the common code of the
two programs seem to have diverged over time (no wonder, duplicated code
almost always suffers from this disease).
Given that the netc
On Wednesday 27 January 2010, Josef Wolf wrote:
> I am wondering what netcfg-static is good for. Looks like it is an
> (outdated) subset of the more generic netcfg.
No. It's used for s390:
installer/build/pkg-lists/netboot/s390.cfg:1:netcfg-static
installer/build/pkg-lists/generic/s390.cfg:3:netcf
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 03:13:58PM +0100, Josef Wolf wrote:
> I am wondering what netcfg-static is good for.
It is used for s390.
> Given that the netcfg/disable_dhcp option exists, is netcfg-static really
> needed?
In the meantime this is correct. DHCP can be used on s390 with some
constraints,
On Wednesday 27 January 2010, Bastian Blank wrote:
> In the meantime this is correct. DHCP can be used on s390 with some
> constraints, but it needs to be disabled by default.
Is it useful in practice though? I rather doubt anyone would want to set up
an s390 box using DHCP.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 04:42:15PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 January 2010, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > In the meantime this is correct. DHCP can be used on s390 with some
> > constraints, but it needs to be disabled by default.
> Is it useful in practice though? I rather doubt anyone w
AFAICS, the following templates are all not used anywhere:
partman-jfs/check_failed
partman-reiserfs/check_failed
partman-ext3/check_failed
partman-ext2r0/check_failed
partman-xfs/check_failed
Meanwhile, partman-basicfilesystems/check_failed is generic
template that could take the place of any of
Source: gcc-4.4
Version: 1:4.4.3-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i patch
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Please consider the attached patch which adds a udeb for libgcc1 containing
only libgcc_s.so.1. That file is needed for the (directfb based) graphical
installer because of pthread_can
-- Forwarded Message --
From: Matthias Klose
On 27.01.2010 21:03, Frans Pop wrote:
> Please consider the attached patch which adds a udeb for libgcc1
> containing only libgcc_s.so.1. That file is needed for the (directfb
> based) graphical installer because of pthread_cancel().
Thanks a lot for the quick reply.
On Wednesday 27 January 2010, Matthias Klose wrote:
> The patch itself looks ok, some other questions:
>
> - did you consider building the udeb from a separate source package,
> build-depending on gcc-4.4-source?
No, I had not considered that. It's an optio
Christian Perrier wrote:
> The remaining months, that should be targeted by anybody but
> me, Frans Pop, Holger Wansing and Lee Winter, are:
> * March 1999 to May 2000
> * October 2000 to July 2002
> * May and June 2004
I just see that as of yesterday the whole archive has now been scanned by
at
Since 2 or 3 days, I'm having build failures on my local daily build
for i386.
They are restricted to hd-media target only:
.../...
rm -rf ./tmp/hd-media/syslinux/*
mkdir -p ./tmp/hd-media/syslinux
TYPE=standard INCLUDE_GTK= DESKTOP=
13 matches
Mail list logo
