Package: network-console
Version: 0627 (backports)
I'm using the version from http://kmuto.jp/debian/d-i/ since I'm
installing on a new Dell R410 and it requires 2.6.29 or later.
It's a network preseed install and although I can ssh in and
/bin/network-console runs fine, if I select the option to
Hello Friends,
I have download the image iso in DVD at your repository but not exist image
BIN, please verify for me.
URL:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/i386/iso-dvd/
[]'s
[Colin Watson]
> I wonder if this really ought to be a hook, or if partman-auto
> should just behave differently as standard? After all, in general if
> automation fails we stop and present a dialog. Adding a hook for
> this seems like overengineering; if the expert recipe fails, an
> error dialog
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 05:35:38PM +0100, Francesco Poli (t1000) wrote:
>
> OK, after that, I start an X session:
>
> $ startx & logout
>
> If I switch back to the console (by pressing [Ctrl+Alt+F1]) and I login
> again, then the output of
>
> $ toilet -f future hello
> ╻ ╻┏━╸╻ ╻ ┏━┓
>
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 03:42:07PM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 02:26:27PM +0100, Goran Vulić wrote:
> >
> > Toggle through different keyboard layout are incorrect when three layout
> > are set.
> > Toggle through layout reproduce this:
> > first,second,third,second, arr
On Monday 14 December 2009, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> Now I see that maybe this is not the best possible cycle. Do you think
> that it will be an improvement if I change the layout switch cycle to be
> first->second->first->third->first->second->first->third-> and so on?
Following the rule of least
Hi,
I use live-helper to build debian live iso's, but now I also want to
build some Ubuntu based iso images with d-i enabled. But not many
ubuntu devs seems to care a lot about d-i and/or live-helper in Ubuntu.
I have reported some bugs on launchpad, and I'm wondering if there are
people w
Frans Pop, le Mon 14 Dec 2009 16:36:04 +0100, a écrit :
> On Monday 14 December 2009, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> > Now I see that maybe this is not the best possible cycle. Do you think
> > that it will be an improvement if I change the layout switch cycle to be
> > first->second->first->third->first-
FYI: The status of the localechooser source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 2.19
Current version: 2.20
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
FYI: The status of the kbd-chooser source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.52
Current version: 1.53
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
l
On Monday 14 December 2009, Debian testing watch wrote:
> FYI: The status of the kbd-chooser source package
> in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
>
> Previous version: 1.52
> Current version: 1.53
This means that lenny-support *must* also migrate before the release (but
not necessa
Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 14 December 2009, Debian testing watch wrote:
>> FYI: The status of the kbd-chooser source package
>> in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
>>
>> Previous version: 1.52
>> Current version: 1.53
>
> This means that lenny-support *must* also migrate before t
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:19:55 +0200 Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 05:35:38PM +0100, Francesco Poli (t1000) wrote:
[...]
> > If I switch back to the console (by pressing [Ctrl+Alt+F1]) and I login
> > again, then the output of
> >
> > $ toilet -f future hello
[...]
> > looks dif
* Bastian Blank [2009-12-05 16:47]:
> I intent to remove the cramfs support from the kernel and the
> cramfsprogs package. Current kernels supports squashfs, which is a
> far more advanced replacement.
>
> It is currently in use by the debian-installer for mips and the
> powerpc floppies.
As Joe
On Saturday 12 December 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> So, if the problem is simply that rdate fails when the current system
> time is before the epoch (1-1-1970), how about we include a trivial
> command to set the date to the epoch before calling rdate as a
> workaround until rdate gets fixed.
Martin
clock-setup_0.101_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
clock-setup_0.101.dsc
clock-setup_0.101.tar.gz
clock-setup_0.101_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host kassia.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
clock-setup_0.101_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
clock-setup_0.101.dsc
clock-setup_0.101.tar.gz
clock-setup_0.101_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ.
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 08:08:12PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
>
> No, I cannot: this command belongs to the kbd package, but I do not
> have this package installed on any of the Debian boxes I use.
>
> Should I switch from console-tools to kbd, in your opinion?
Console-tools has several bugs t
On Monday 14 December 2009, Adrian Bridgett wrote:
> Version: 0627 (backports)
I doubt this is a valid version of network-console as I see no reason why
it should have been backported. Can you check the actual version of the
package (in /var/lib/dpkg/status)?
> I'm using the version from http:/
Your message dated Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:48:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#548128: fixed in clock-setup 0.101
has caused the Debian Bug report #548128,
regarding rdate fails when the system clock is set to a very old date
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:02:53 +0200 Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 08:08:12PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> >
> > No, I cannot: this command belongs to the kbd package, but I do not
> > have this package installed on any of the Debian boxes I use.
> >
> > Should I switch from co
*1. Giới thiệu*
* *
* Công Ty Cổ Phần Thương Mại và Đầu Tư Phát Triển Công Nghệ Việt
Quang Long **hoạt động trên lĩnh vực thiết bị an ninh, báo động, báo cháy,
camera giám sát của các hãng:*
* Honeywell, Panasonic, Avtech, Kocom, TeleEye, Vivotek.*
*2. Lĩnh vực hoạt động *
* *
*
*1. Giới thiệu*
* *
* Công Ty Cổ Phần Thương Mại và Đầu Tư Phát Triển Công Nghệ Việt
Quang Long **hoạt động trên lĩnh vực thiết bị an ninh, báo động, báo cháy,
camera giám sát của các hãng:*
* Honeywell, Panasonic, Avtech, Kocom, TeleEye, Vivotek.*
*2. Lĩnh vực hoạt động *
* *
*
23 matches
Mail list logo