Hi,
I'm going to upload dmraid 1.0.0.rc16 (already in experimental) in unstable.
The only relevant change for d-i is the SONAME bump, so now we have
libdmraid1.0.0.rc16-udeb.
Is it ok for you?
Cheers,
Giuseppe.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hello,
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 6:21 AM, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm going to upload dmraid 1.0.0.rc16 (already in experimental) in unstable.
>
> The only relevant change for d-i is the SONAME bump, so now we have
> libdmraid1.0.0.rc16-udeb.
>
> Is it ok for you?
I think so.
--
Otavi
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 1:29 AM, Vadim Solomin wrote:
> Package: mmc-modules-2.6.30-2-486-di
> Version: 1.84
>
> Hi! Daily d-i fails to detect SDHC card slot in Acer Aspire One (
> 04:00.2 SD Host controller [0805]: JMicron Technology Corp. Standard SD Host
> Controller [197b:2381] (prog-if 01)
>
Hi,
On Freitag, 22. Mai 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Dominique Brazziel (dbrazz...@snet.net):
> > This bug needs to stay open until it is resolved either by inserting a
> > clear and concise warning or requirements sections in the relevant
> > Debian documentation or making more the in
FYI: The status of the kbd-chooser source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.48
Current version: 1.52
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
l
FYI: The status of the lenny-support source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: (not in testing)
Current version: 0.02
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
FYI: The status of the console-setup source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.45
Current version: 1.49
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
FYI: The status of the linux-kernel-di-mipsel-2.6 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.15
Current version: 1.16
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
FYI: The status of the rootskel-gtk source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.16
Current version: 1.17
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
FYI: The status of the partman-ext3 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 55
Current version: 58
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
late
FYI: The status of the preseed source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.42
Current version: 1.43
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later
FYI: The status of the tzsetup source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:0.26
Current version: 1:0.27
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
l
Hi Martin
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 05:38:58PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I think the patch I proposed (below) is fine but we still need a new
> template.
>
> How about the following text:
>
> _Description: Go back to the menu and correct this problem?
> Your boot partition has not been mar
Quoting Holger Levsen (hol...@layer-acht.org):
> Hi,
>
> On Freitag, 22. Mai 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Quoting Dominique Brazziel (dbrazz...@snet.net):
> > > This bug needs to stay open until it is resolved either by inserting a
> > > clear and concise warning or requirements sections in
On Thursday 26 November 2009, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> > _Description: Go back to the menu and correct this problem?
> > Your boot partition has not been marked as a bootable partition, even
> > though this is required by your machine in order to boot. Please go
> > back and set the bootable fl
* Frans Pop [2009-11-26 20:07]:
> There is nothing that guarantees the bootloader is installed in the /boot
> partition, or that the /boot partition is the first partition on the disk.
This bug is about a script which ensures that /boot is the 1st primary
partition and that it's ext2 or ext3, wh
Your message dated Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:40:38 -0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#556906: Net-install (i386, build of November 8) fails
on Dell Optiplex 360
has caused the Debian Bug report #556906,
regarding Net-install (i386, build of November 8) fails on Dell Optiplex 360
to be mark
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 11:17:07PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> Do you really think that having "AMD64", "Intel x86" and "Intel IA-64"
> instead of amd64, i386, ia64 will make people magically choose AMD64 if
> they're looking for 64-bit Intel support?
I hadn't realised that Simon had made this cha
* Otavio Salvador (ota...@ossystems.com.br) wrote:
|> This looks to be a kernel issue and would be nice to try latest
|> version of d-i to see if it happens or not.
|>
|> Mind to retest it?
Sorry to be slow (I've been fiendishly busy).
But I tested the d-i build of November 22nd and
On Thursday 26 November 2009, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 11:17:07PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Do you really think that having "AMD64", "Intel x86" and "Intel IA-64"
> > instead of amd64, i386, ia64 will make people magically choose AMD64
> > if they're looking for 64-bit Inte
20 matches
Mail list logo
