On Saturday 22 August 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> I've verified that both issues are not present in a daily built image
> using current libraries from unstable. I'll file a bug against the
> experimental version of directfb later.
Filed as: http://bugs.debian.org/543590
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
partman-auto-raid_15_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-auto-raid_15.dsc
partman-auto-raid_15.tar.gz
partman-auto-raid_15_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
Rejected: Unknown distribution `karmic'.
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
partman-auto-raid_15_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-auto-raid_15.dsc
partman-auto-raid_15.tar.gz
partman-auto-raid_15_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
Accepted:
partman-auto-raid_15.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-auto-raid/partman-auto-raid_15.dsc
partman-auto-raid_15.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-auto-raid/partman-auto-raid_15.tar.gz
partman-auto-raid_15_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-auto-raid/partman-auto-raid_15_all.udeb
Override entrie
Your message dated Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:17:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#484421: fixed in partman-auto-raid 15
has caused the Debian Bug report #484421,
regarding partman-auto-raid: Should support preseeding of LVM-over-RAID setups
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Your message dated Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:17:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#537928: fixed in partman-auto-raid 15
has caused the Debian Bug report #537928,
regarding $NAMED_SPARES is miscounted (breaks auto-raid when using more than 1
spare)
to be marked as done.
This means that you
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:25:43AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> - if we go this way it will mean that we'll have to continue to support
> the few "required Recommends" that have been identified in the past;
> one example is busybox for initramfs-tools, another that IMO is worth
> keeping is libg
Accepted:
dh-di_1.dsc
to pool/main/d/dh-di/dh-di_1.dsc
dh-di_1.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/dh-di/dh-di_1.tar.gz
dh-di_1_all.deb
to pool/main/d/dh-di/dh-di_1_all.deb
Override entries for your package:
dh-di_1.dsc - optional devel
dh-di_1_all.deb - optional devel
Announcing to debian-devel-chan..
On Monday 17 August 2009, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > It sounds like the "rsc console" is something different, which could
> > explain what you saw. Maybe we need special handling for this case.
>
> The rsc is much like an iLo or alom. It's just another management
> interface that offers a 'console' i
iyi günler,
Eğer aracınızın muayenesi yoksa ve trafik kontrolune yakalanırsanız;
1 Araç ruhsatı sizin adına değilse otomobiliniz direk parka çekilir
2 Ruhsat sahibi sizseniz önce 62 tl ceza öderseniz sonra 15 günlük muayene
müsade belgesi alarak muayenenizi aylık % 5 ceza ile yaptırısınız.
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Task: standard
> Section: user
> Description: Standard system utilities
> This task sets up a basic user environment, providing a reasonably
> small selection of services and tools usable on the command line.
> Packages: standard
> Test-new-install: mark skip
>
> I ass
On Wednesday 26 August 2009, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> Shouldn't they actually be Depends if they are really required for a
> working system? I don't see why you want to special case some packages.
You'd have to take that up with the maintainers of the packages. But for
the two cases I mentioned
On Wednesday 26 August 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 August 2009, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> > Shouldn't they actually be Depends if they are really required for a
> > working system? I don't see why you want to special case some
> > packages.
>
> You'd have to take that up with the maint
(debian-cd added in CC with full quote of original mail)
On Tuesday 25 August 2009, Joey Hess wrote:
> A problem with providing some global way of turning off recommends by
> default in d-i is that tasks are now being maintained with the implicit
> and explicit assumption that recommends are insta
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:19:06 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
>I've been wondering whether we don't need a new field to express such
>relationships. Something like "Soft-Depends:". That would be treated as
>depends, but can be unselected manually or uninstalled later if a user
>really, really wants to.
linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6_1.42lenny5_ia64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6_1.42lenny5.dsc
linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6_1.42lenny5.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.26-2-itanium-di_1.42lenny5_ia64.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.26-2-itanium-di_1.42lenny5_ia64
On Wednesday 26 August 2009, Don Wright wrote:
> If there are few enough packages needing an "Almost-Always-Depends:"
> field, could this be handled by a dummy package in the Depends: list?
> Something like "Depends: busybox-dummy | busybox" where busybox-dummy
> would not normally be available (an
subscribe
--
James Richardson
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
http://www.linkedin.com/in/jamesrichardsonconsulting
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: debootstrap
Severity: normal
Hi, I seemed to be having the same issue, here is my info.
I have been trying to bootstrap several openvz instances with debootstrap
incantations similar to:
$sudo debootstrap --variant minbase
--include=aptitude,netbase,ifupdown,puppet,lsb-release sid
/
dh-di_2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
dh-di_2.dsc
dh-di_2.tar.gz
dh-di_2_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas.
Package: partman-auto-raid
Version: 15
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu ubuntu-patch karmic
partman-auto-raid/recipe currently has to be set like this:
d-i partman-auto-raid/recipe string \
1 2 0 ext3 / /dev/sda1#/dev/sdb1 . \
1 2 0 sw
Accepted:
dh-di_2.dsc
to pool/main/d/dh-di/dh-di_2.dsc
dh-di_2.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/dh-di/dh-di_2.tar.gz
dh-di_2_all.deb
to pool/main/d/dh-di/dh-di_2_all.deb
Override entries for your package:
dh-di_2.dsc - source devel
dh-di_2_all.deb - optional devel
Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@
The following patch removes the need for python-xml.
Note that python-xml is currently really a run-time dependency, not a
build-dependency.
Ben.
diff -Nru discover-data-2.2008.06.25/debian/control
discover-data-2.2008.06.25+nmu1/debian/control
--- discover-data-2.2008.06.25/debian/control 20
So, that change was made in tasksel three months ago, near to the start
what was, AFAIK at the time, a 1.5 year release cycle. This was done in
full knowledge that enabling recommends would take some time to sort
out, including getting debian-cd to disable NORECOMMENDS and maybe
handle recommends m
Frans Pop:
> I've been wondering whether we don't need a new field to express such
> relationships. Something like "Soft-Depends:". That would be treated as
> depends, but can be unselected manually or uninstalled later if a user
> really, really wants to.
You can come up with subtle graduation
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 01:59 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> The following patch removes the need for python-xml.
Sorry, that only covers the reduce-xml script. merge-lst-to-xml also
needs to be modified.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
If at first you don't succeed, you're doing about average.
signature
Accepted:
ata-modules-2.6.26-2-itanium-di_1.42lenny5_ia64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6/ata-modules-2.6.26-2-itanium-di_1.42lenny5_ia64.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.26-2-itanium-di_1.42lenny5_ia64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.26-2-itanium-
28 matches
Mail list logo
