Re: test of makefs in kfreebsd d-i

On 04/08/2009, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Luca Favatella dixit: > >>I'm attaching >>* a screenshot of the problem I get in the (monolithic) image built using >> makefs > > Please attach screenshots in ASCII. I mostly read my eMails either > via ssh or on an 80486DLC laptop from 1993 with not enough

Re: test of makefs in kfreebsd d-i

Luca Favatella dixit: >* a screenshot of the problem I get in the (monolithic) image built > using makefs Ok, I see now (forwarded to workplace): I think you really should RTFM. There are quite some options: -f free-files Ensure that a minimum of free-files free files (inodes)

Re: debian installer daily developmental build from 4.8.2009

Quoting Dieter Faulbaum (dieter.faulb...@bessy.de): > > Dear installer developer, > > the debian installer (daily build from 4.8.2009) has a kernel version > 2.6.30-1-486, which supports the ext4 filesystem and the installer gives > me the possibility to select this filesystem version. But the ke

Processed: Re: Bug#540023: cdrom: netinst installation might freeze with out-of-date keyring

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 540023 wishlist Bug #540023 [cdrom] cdrom: netinst installation might freeze with out-of-date keyring Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'grave' > reassign 540023 debian-installer Bug #540023 [cdrom] cdrom: netinst installation might freez

Re: test of makefs in kfreebsd d-i

On 05/08/2009, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Luca Favatella dixit: > >>* a screenshot of the problem I get in the (monolithic) image built >> using makefs > > Ok, I see now (forwarded to workplace): [...] > cf. http://www.mirbsd.org/htman/i386/man8/makefs.htm > > I’d say your best bet is to use -f wit

Re: test of makefs in kfreebsd d-i

Thorsten Glaser a écrit : > On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, Luca Favatella wrote: > >> It looks like there are no regressions in the produced monolithic and >> netboot images. > > Cool! > > Should I proceed to upload makefs as-is to Debian? Is there someone > here willing to sponsor? Otherwise, Mika Prokop

Re: test of makefs in kfreebsd d-i

On 04/08/2009, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Luca Favatella dixit: [...] > Why do you copy ${TREE}/* to a temporary $$fs/ first, anyway? > You can run it directly on ${TREE} I'd say: > > define mkfs.ufs1 > sh -c 'makefs -t ffs -s ${IMGSZ} -o minfree=0,version=1 $$0 ${TREE}' > endef > > Again, unteste

Bug#540031:

Package: installation-reports Boot method: Image version: Date: <~11pm central time august 4th, again roughly 2 hours later> Machine: Processor: Memory: 512mb ddr1 Partitions: Output of lspci -knn (or

Re: test of makefs in kfreebsd d-i

On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, Luca Favatella wrote: > It looks like there are no regressions in the produced monolithic and > netboot images. Cool! Should I proceed to upload makefs as-is to Debian? Is there someone here willing to sponsor? Otherwise, Mika Prokop from grml.org has volunteered to do it if

Bug#540031:

On Wednesday 05 August 2009, Drew Kropp wrote: > Comments/Problems: Twice the install froze on "retrieving file 753 of > 753 25% Please send the /var/log/syslog from the installation after the freeze (assuming you can still switch to a debug console on VT2 or VT3). Make sure you gzip the syslog b

Re: test of makefs in kfreebsd d-i

Luca Favatella dixit: >Tested. Please see Great ☺ >http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/d-i/branches/d-i/kfreebsd/installer/build/Makefile?r1=59940&r2=59943&pathrev=59943 You forgot “&diff_format=u” otherwise I see nothing… Why didn’t you set minfree to 0 from the default of 5% as it doesn’t make any

Re: test of makefs in kfreebsd d-i

Aurelien Jarno dixit: >I will have a look at the package and upload it if everything is fine. Thanks. >I am a bit concerned by the name though. I understand it comes from the NetBSD® world, actually. It handles 4.2FFS, UFS2 and ISO 9660 (plus SUSP, RRIP, El Torito). Support for ext2fs is possib

Bug#540031:

I downloaded the iso again and the routine finished. Looks like I should have tried a little harder first! thanks On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 4:59 AM, Frans Pop wrote: > On Wednesday 05 August 2009, Drew Kropp wrote: > > Comments/Problems: Twice the install froze on "retrieving file 753 of > > 753 25

Bug#540031: marked as done ()

Your message dated Wed, 5 Aug 2009 12:59:34 +0200 with message-id <200908051259.34813.elen...@planet.nl> and subject line Re: Bug#540031: has caused the Debian Bug report #540031, regarding to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

Re: test of makefs in kfreebsd d-i

On 05/08/2009, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Luca Favatella dixit: [...] > Why didn’t you set minfree to 0 from the default of 5% as > it doesn’t make any sense in initrd? Done. http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/d-i?view=rev&revision=59946 Can you please explain me better the difference between "-f" and

Re: test of makefs in kfreebsd d-i

Luca Favatella dixit: >Can you please explain me better the difference between "-f" and >"minfree" (the man page is not clear). I read: Sure. -f ensures, for makefs(8), that the filesystem has enough free inodes, whereas minfree is a tunefs(8) parametre you might know from ext2fs, which measures

Re: test of makefs in kfreebsd d-i

On 05/08/2009, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Luca Favatella dixit: > >>Can you please explain me better the difference between "-f" and >>"minfree" (the man page is not clear). I read: > > Sure. -f ensures, for makefs(8), that the filesystem has enough > free inodes, whereas minfree is a tunefs(8) para

linux-modules-di-s390-2.6_1.14_multi.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: linux-modules-di-s390-2.6_1.14.dsc to pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-s390-2.6/linux-modules-di-s390-2.6_1.14.dsc linux-modules-di-s390-2.6_1.14.tar.gz to pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-s390-2.6/linux-modules-di-s390-2.6_1.14.tar.gz loop-aes-modules-2.6.30-1-s390x-di_1.14_s390.udeb to

FW: Wireless Install

Found it. Thanks. From: Philip Joslin - C10554 Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 1:14 PM To: 'debian-boot@lists.debian.org' Subject: Wireless Install Is there anywhere that I can objtain succint (and detailed) step-by-step instructions on how to get my Intel 210

Re: Spam cleaning for August 2004

On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:59:43 +0200, Frans Pop wrote: >On Wednesday 17 June 2009, Christian Perrier wrote: >> Back in August 2004, a huge "storm" happened with someone's >> autoresponder spamming the list with hundreds of messages, apparently >> looping. >> >> I found these in the list archive whi

Bug#539228: partman freezes with encrypted partitions

I have rapidly tried the same install with the same usbkey on another laptop(not the same model) The first part of partitionning (choosing uncrypted and encrypted partitions) seems to work... ( i can't go further without loosing my data) I am a noob of the syslog,but from what i have seen ,it see

Re: Spam cleaning for August 2004

Quoting Don Wright (wdi...@wricomp.net): > Today I see this storm is still present. Does it need additional follow > up with listmasters or should it be marked manually like the rest? I'd say "mark it manually". Apparently, that will be more efficient..:-) The best for doing this efficiently is