Package: console-setup
Version: 1.36
Severity: normal
You should not use dpkg --print-installation-architecture otherwise
starting with the upcoming dpkg 1.15.1 you will get annoying warnings like
this:
dpkg: warning: obsolete option '--print-installation-architecture', please
use '--print-archite
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 527641 1.35
Bug#527641: Package installation overwrites /etc/default/console-setup without
warning
Bug marked as found in version 1.35 and reopened.
> found 527641 1.36
Bug#527641: Package installation overwrites /etc/default/console-setup
found 527641 1.35
found 527641 1.36
thanks
On Fri, 08 May 2009, Dave Witbrodt wrote:
> I have set the severity of this bug report to "serious" because,
> technically, it is a policy violation to overwrite user changes to file
> in /etc;
This is the real problem this bug is about... so closing it
Christian Perrier, le Wed 20 May 2009 08:06:55 +0200, a écrit :
> In low memory mode, translations will be dropped anyway.
When using templates, yes. But here translations are included directly
in the .config script because we need to mangle the answers.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
Quoting Steven Sciame (sasci...@yahoo.com):
> Hello,
>
> Thank you for the reply. I typed in wireless because that was the ESSID
> that I wanted to connect to, but it didn't work and without a connection you
> can only get so far with the install. It seemed like it would be fine all
> the
Quoting Samuel Thibault (sthiba...@debian.org):
> Christian Perrier, le Wed 20 May 2009 08:06:55 +0200, a écrit :
> > In low memory mode, translations will be dropped anyway.
>
> When using templates, yes. But here translations are included directly
> in the .config script because we need to mang
hi,
I tried setting "export DISKTYPE=CD700" in debian-cd's CONF.sh, but
when i run easy-build.sh to build a CD image, the image size always
remains below 650MB. What could the problem be? I also tried adding
more packages to debian-cd/tasks/lenny/forcd1 (to add more packages in
CD1? - i hope i am
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> To fix it, you have to:
> 1/ document in the file that it's auto-updated based on the debconf
> infos and that dpkg-reconfigure console-setup is recommended to update
> it 2/ use ucf or something similar to detect if the file has been
> edited by t
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:21:10AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> found 527641 1.35
> found 527641 1.36
> thanks
If you have found the bug in versions 1.35 and 1.36, please provide more
information: is this reproduced behaviour, how did it occur, what was
the contents of the configuration file
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 527641 1.35
Bug#527641: Package installation overwrites /etc/default/console-setup without
warning
Bug no longer marked as found in version 1.35.
> notfound 527641 1.36
Bug#527641: Package installation overwrites /etc/default/console-se
notfound 527641 1.35
notfound 527641 1.36
retitle 527641 doesn't support/keep undefined FONT* parameters
close 527641 1.35
On Wed, 20 May 2009, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> If you have found the bug in versions 1.35 and 1.36, please provide more
> information: is this reproduced behaviour, how did it
user-setup_1.24_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp.upload.debian.org
along with the files:
user-setup_1.24.dsc
user-setup_1.24.tar.gz
user-setup-udeb_1.24_all.udeb
user-setup_1.24_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...
user-setup_1.24_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
user-setup_1.24.dsc
user-setup_1.24.tar.gz
user-setup-udeb_1.24_all.udeb
user-setup_1.24_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debia
Accepted:
user-setup-udeb_1.24_all.udeb
to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup-udeb_1.24_all.udeb
user-setup_1.24.dsc
to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup_1.24.dsc
user-setup_1.24.tar.gz
to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup_1.24.tar.gz
user-setup_1.24_all.deb
to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-s
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 12:45:55PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> Well, when I reported #528033, something had lost my "bepo" setting
> on upgrade without me doing dpkg-reconfigure console-setup. I assumed
> it was already reported since 527641 said "Package installation overwrites
> /etc/defau
Your message dated Wed, 20 May 2009 11:32:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#529475: fixed in user-setup 1.24
has caused the Debian Bug report #529475,
regarding user-setup fails because -m option is no longer valid
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Wed, 20 May 2009 11:32:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#528610: fixed in user-setup 1.24
has caused the Debian Bug report #528610,
regarding chpasswd encrypted option is gone
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #console-setup (1.37) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> #
> # * Use dpkg --print-architecture debconf config script. Closes: #529574
> #
> package console-setup-sun5-ekmap console-setup-fonts-udeb bdf2psf
> console-setup-ataritt-ekmap console-setup-pc-e
+user-setup (1.24) unstable; urgency=low
+ [ Christian Perrier ]
+ * No longer use the "-m" switch of chpasswd. It uses PAM now and no
+longer has this switch. The password will use settings from
+libpam-runtime, so MD5 by default.
Does this mean it is no longer possible to preseed using
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> +user-setup (1.24) unstable; urgency=low
> + [ Christian Perrier ]
> + * No longer use the "-m" switch of chpasswd. It uses PAM now and no
> +longer has this switch. The password will use settings from
> +libpam-runtime, so MD5 by default.
>
>
linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.56_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
ftp.upload.debian.org
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.56.dsc
linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.56.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
nic-extr
linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.56_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.56.dsc
linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.56.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
nic-extra-modules-2.6
linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.79_multi.changes uploaded successfully to
ftp.upload.debian.org
along with the files:
squashfs-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
kernel-image-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
ext2-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
fb-modules-2.6.29-2-686-big
linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.79_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
squashfs-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
kernel-image-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
ext2-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
fb-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i
Accepted:
acpi-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/acpi-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
ata-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/ata-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
cdrom-core-mod
Accepted:
acpi-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/acpi-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
acpi-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/acpi-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
ata-modules-
(CC me on replies, please)
Hi!
Sorry if this "issue" was already discussed and if this is not a
problem, but when installing a basic Debian system (only the
minimal system, without selecting anything when tasksel appears), I see
that some packages are installed but don't see to be needed.
For exa
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> Sorry if this "issue" was already discussed and if this is not a
> problem, but when installing a basic Debian system (only the
> minimal system, without selecting anything when tasksel appears), I see
> that some packages are installed but d
Hi!
Frans Pop schrieb:
>> Sorry if this "issue" was already discussed and if this is not a
>> problem, but when installing a basic Debian system (only the
>> minimal system, without selecting anything when tasksel appears), I see
>> that some packages are installed but don't see to be needed.
>>
Accepted:
user-setup-udeb_1.25_all.udeb
to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup-udeb_1.25_all.udeb
user-setup_1.25.dsc
to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup_1.25.dsc
user-setup_1.25.tar.gz
to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup_1.25.tar.gz
user-setup_1.25_all.deb
to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-s
As I described in an earlier post, "it didn't work" refers to the error
message telling me that, "Configuration of the wireless network failed. Either
I got the name wrong or it is taking too long to connect." Something to that
effect.
I tried to continue on as long as I could, but you ev
Hi,
glib2.0 and atk1.0 have been ready to migrate to testing for a while.
The former has a RC bug fixed and the other which is Is it possible to
unblock them?
Thanks,
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `' “I recommend you to learn English in hope that you in
`- future understand
Hi Frans!
On Wed, 20 May 2009 17:31:04 +0200
Frans Pop wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> > Frans Pop schrieb:
> > >> Sorry if this "issue" was already discussed and if this is not a
> > >> problem, but when installing a basic Debian system (only the
> > >> min
FYI: The status of the kernel-wedge source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 2.57
Current version: 2.58
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
user-setup_1.25_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp.upload.debian.org
along with the files:
user-setup_1.25.dsc
user-setup_1.25.tar.gz
user-setup-udeb_1.25_all.udeb
user-setup_1.25_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 07:15:20PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> When choosing an origin (for instance Albania) that only has one layout, it
> is kinda useless to ask about the layout...as only one choice is possible.
> So I propose skipping that question in such case.
Debconf doesn't ask s
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> Frans Pop schrieb:
> >> Sorry if this "issue" was already discussed and if this is not a
> >> problem, but when installing a basic Debian system (only the
> >> minimal system, without selecting anything when tasksel appears), I
> >> see t
Package: console-setup-udeb
Severity: normal
The config script takes great care to provide sane defaults for the keyboard
layout, depending on language and/or language/country settings.
For that reason, I think that the priority of the console-setup/layout
question should be "high" and not criti
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 07:12:57PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> Once one has gone through the "Configure the keyboard" step in D-I (indeed a
> modified D-I where console-setup-udeb is used in place of kbd-config), it is
> not possible to come over the questions again.
>
> Reselecting the "
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 07:27:43PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> The config script takes great care to provide sane defaults for the keyboard
> layout, depending on language and/or language/country settings.
>
> For that reason, I think that the priority of the console-setup/layout
> quest
Hello Christian,
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Christian Perrier wrote:
> - another solution proposed by otavio that I haven't been able to
> understand: he'll propose a patch soon
I'm sending the attached patch for people to comment. My idea is that
the lenny.sh script to be included in lenn
Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
> On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> > +user-setup (1.24) unstable; urgency=low
> > + [ Christian Perrier ]
> > + * No longer use the "-m" switch of chpasswd. It uses PAM now and no
> > +longer has this switch. The password will use settings fr
user-setup_1.25_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
user-setup_1.25.dsc
user-setup_1.25.tar.gz
user-setup-udeb_1.25_all.udeb
user-setup_1.25_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debia
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 07:12:57PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Once one has gone through the "Configure the keyboard" step in D-I
> > (indeed a modified D-I where console-setup-udeb is used in place of
> > kbd-config), it is not possible to
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Hello Christian,
>
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Christian Perrier
wrote:
> > - another solution proposed by otavio that I haven't been able to
> > understand: he'll propose a patch soon
>
> I'm sending the attached patch for people to comme
Package: console-setup-udeb
Severity: normal
Once one has gone through the "Configure the keyboard" step in D-I (indeed a
modified D-I where console-setup-udeb is used in place of kbd-config), it is
not possible to come over the questions again.
Reselecting the "Configure the keyboard" menu entry
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> Still using the minimal install example (without selection "standard
> system" nor other task), shouldn't them have their priority lowered
> then?
Possibly. But that is something that probably should have been done
*before* lenny was releas
Package: console-setup-udeb
Severity: normal
When choosing an origin (for instance Albania) that only has one layout, it
is kinda useless to ask about the layout...as only one choice is possible.
So I propose skipping that question in such case.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
Hello,
Here goes a fixed patch for review.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
From 607dc2fe724748617498d79f22be82816f95014e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From:
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> I belive this does all right now. Patch attached.
No, it's still broken. You're seriously underestimating the complexity
here.
KISS! Especially because the risk is huge that you will only find bugs in
such code _after_ you've already released.
Hello Frans,
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> I belive this does all right now. Patch attached.
>
> No, it's still broken. You're seriously underestimating the complexity
> here.
I'd love to know what I missed, if you don't m
Hello,
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Otavio Salvador
wrote:
> I'd love to know what I missed, if you don't mind to explain. Anyway
> an alternative patch is attached.
I've already added the missing $ROOT in dpkg --compare-versions call, locally.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Syst
Hi,
eglibc 2.9-12 is now in the archive for more than ten days, but it is
not considered by britney because the version tracking does not work
with the source package name change.
The current RC bugs are already present in testing. One is already fixed
in the SVN and will be closed in 2.9-13.
Co
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
> > No, it's still broken. You're seriously underestimating the
> > complexity here.
>
> I'd love to know what I missed, if you don't mind to explain.
Try a grep for codename. It's a fairly basic
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> I've already added the missing $ROOT in dpkg --compare-versions call,
> locally.
Which means you're still missing it in the dpkg -s call?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
package: choose-mirror
tags 517644 + reopen
thanks
Hi,
I just tried to use the lenny installer to install an etch i386 system.
The same issue as before occurs, see the /var/log/installer/syslog
extract below.
I redid the install with suite="oldstable" in the PXE boot line and got
the same resu
Hello Frans,
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
>> > No, it's still broken. You're seriously underestimating the
>> > complexity here.
>>
>> I'd love to know what I missed, if y
57 matches
Mail list logo
