linux-kernel-di-armel-2.6_1.34_armel.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-armel-2.6_1.34.dsc
linux-kernel-di-armel-2.6_1.34.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.29-2-iop32x-di_1.34_armel.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.29-2-iop32x-di_1.34_armel.udeb
nic-shared-modules-
* Joey Hess [2009-05-04 15:44]:
> > I asked Joey Hess whether the postinst hook for flash-kernel can
> > safely be removed (maybe there are corner cases where it's still
> > needed) but didn't get a reply. Joey?
>
> I don't know if I've thought of every corner case, but in the general
> case, I
flash-kernel_2.18_armel.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
flash-kernel_2.18.dsc
flash-kernel_2.18.tar.gz
flash-kernel_2.18_armel.deb
flash-kernel-installer_2.18_armel.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot
(new) ata-modules-2.6.29-2-ixp4xx-di_1.34_armel.udeb extra debian-installer
ATA disk modules
This package contains core ATA disk modules used by both PATA and SATA
disk drivers.
(new) cdrom-core-modules-2.6.29-2-iop32x-di_1.34_armel.udeb standard
debian-installer
CDROM support
This package cont
Accepted:
flash-kernel-installer_2.18_armel.udeb
to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel-installer_2.18_armel.udeb
flash-kernel_2.18.dsc
to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel_2.18.dsc
flash-kernel_2.18.tar.gz
to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel_2.18.tar.gz
flash-kernel_2.18_armel.de
Your message dated Tue, 19 May 2009 11:17:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#526640: fixed in flash-kernel 2.18
has caused the Debian Bug report #526640,
regarding Please try to keep the number of flashes minimal
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Hi
You can try with the images inside the "compiled" CD, and extract initrd.gz
with cpio.
I don't know if the debian-installer kernel have the "/proc/config.gz" file
with confguration...
2009/5/18 Jon Ander Ortiz
> Hi everyone!
>
> I've working on an custom installer. Now, we're using the lenn
Quoting Steven Sciame (sasci...@yahoo.com):
> Ok,
>
> I figured out where to typ the iwlist eth1 scan
>
> It told me interface doesn't support scanning
Of course, eth1 should be replaced by the interface name of your
wireless card.
When you use Knoppix, you can probably do "dmesg|more" t
the usermod command can use an encrypted password
--- /usr/lib/user-setup/user-setup-apply 2008-08-09 21:35:55.0 +0200
+++ user-setup-apply 2009-05-19 11:25:21.0 +0200
@@ -29,13 +29,12 @@
USER="$1"
PASSWD="$2"
if [ "$3" = true ]; then
- OPTS=-e
+ $chroot $ROOT usermod --pas
Quoting Jordi Pujol (jordipuj...@gmail.com):
> the usermod command can use an encrypted password
Thanks a lot (I apparently missed the bug report, sorry for this). Did
you test the patch?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Quoting Anton Zinoviev (an...@lml.bas.bg):
> # In d-i the config script is not executed automatically
> if [ -f /usr/share/console-setup-mini/console-setup.config ]; then
> . /usr/share/console-setup-mini/console-setup.config
> fi
>
> I commited the required change.
However, it makes consol
Package: user-setup
Version: 1.23
Severity: serious
Apparently chpasswd no longer accepts the -m option!
May 19 14:28:25 finish-install: info: Running
/usr/lib/finish-install.d/06user-setup
May 19 14:28:26 user-setup: Shadow passwords are now on.
May 19 14:28:26 finish-install: chpasswd: invalid
Hello,
Thank you for the reply. I typed in wireless because that was the ESSID
that I wanted to connect to, but it didn't work and without a connection you
can only get so far with the install. It seemed like it would be fine all the
way up to the configure wireless network.
I inst
Quoting Martin Michlmayr (t...@cyrius.com):
> Package: user-setup
> Version: 1.23
> Severity: serious
>
> Apparently chpasswd no longer accepts the -m option!
>
> May 19 14:28:25 finish-install: info: Running
> /usr/lib/finish-install.d/06user-setup
> May 19 14:28:26 user-setup: Shadow passwords
A Dimarts 19 Maig 2009 16:12:11, Christian Perrier va escriure:
> Quoting Jordi Pujol (jordipuj...@gmail.com):
> > the usermod command can use an encrypted password
>
> Thanks a lot (I apparently missed the bug report, sorry for this). Did
> you test the patch?
not really in this package,
when the
Quoting Christian Perrier (bubu...@debian.org):
> However, it makes console-setup-udeb fail:
>
> /usr/share/console-setup-mini/console-setup.config: Permission denied
>
> Also, after "chmod u+x", it also fails because the script starts with
> "#!/bin/bash" and there is no bash in D-I.
>
Fixing
Quoting Jordi Pujol (jordipuj...@gmail.com):
> A Dimarts 19 Maig 2009 16:12:11, Christian Perrier va escriure:
> > Quoting Jordi Pujol (jordipuj...@gmail.com):
> > > the usermod command can use an encrypted password
> >
> > Thanks a lot (I apparently missed the bug report, sorry for this). Did
> >
* Martin Michlmayr [2009-04-29 19:34]:
> * Colin Watson [2009-04-29 12:55]:
> > > > I've uploaded the corresponding kbd-chooser change now. Can you let me
> > > > know if it's still broken after that?
> > >
> > > This is still there, btw.
> >
> > Could I see syslog, please?
>
> Attached.
This
Quoting Christian Perrier (bubu...@debian.org):
> I leave this to Anton, though, as it requires a better knowledge of
> c-s than the one I have.
Fixed..:-)
Now, Anton, an upload would be great as that would help considering
doing the switch to console-setup.
About this, I digged a little in l1
Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> ltsp is blocked from migrating into testing, due to the ltsp-client-builder
> udeb, though this udeb is not used by debian-installer by default, and has no
> changes since the previous version.
>
> it has been in unstable for 6 days without introducing new problems, and
Package: linux-kernel-di-hppa-2.6
Version: 1.42
Severity: minor
Kyle McMartin has retired, so can't work on
the linux-kernel-di-hppa-2.6 package anymore (at least with this address).
We are tracking their status in the MIA team and would like to ask you
to remove them from the Uploaders list of
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 06:50:24PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> Fixing this might require to add a "chmod a+x" after the dh_install
> command in debian/rules.
Thanks to you and Samuel Thibauld for discovering the problems and
finding proper fixes. I commited them.
> However, as this fil
console-setup_1.36_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
console-setup_1.36.dsc
console-setup_1.36.tar.gz
console-setup_1.36_all.deb
console-setup-mini_1.36_all.deb
bdf2psf_1.36_all.deb
console-setup-udeb_1.36_all.udeb
console-setup-amiga-ekmap_1.36_all
Accepted:
bdf2psf_1.36_all.deb
to pool/main/c/console-setup/bdf2psf_1.36_all.deb
console-setup-amiga-ekmap_1.36_all.udeb
to pool/main/c/console-setup/console-setup-amiga-ekmap_1.36_all.udeb
console-setup-ataritt-ekmap_1.36_all.udeb
to pool/main/c/console-setup/console-setup-ataritt-ekmap_1.3
Accepted:
ata-modules-2.6.29-2-ixp4xx-di_1.34_armel.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-armel-2.6/ata-modules-2.6.29-2-ixp4xx-di_1.34_armel.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.29-2-iop32x-di_1.34_armel.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-armel-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.29-2-iop32x-di_1.34_armel.ude
Your message dated Tue, 19 May 2009 19:17:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#529012: fixed in console-setup 1.36
has caused the Debian Bug report #529012,
regarding console-setup (1.35) iconv: illegal input sequence at position 11076
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Your message dated Tue, 19 May 2009 19:17:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#529031: fixed in console-setup 1.36
has caused the Debian Bug report #529031,
regarding [INTL:es] Spanish debconf template translation for console-setup
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Your message dated Tue, 19 May 2009 19:17:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#439633: fixed in console-setup 1.36
has caused the Debian Bug report #439633,
regarding console-setup-udeb: Does not completely execute its postinst script
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Hello,
Christian Perrier, le Tue 19 May 2009 07:32:54 +0200, a écrit :
> Daily builds that include brltty-udeb are failing since about 2 days:
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> brltty-udeb: Depends: libsm6 but it is not installable
>Depends: libx11-6 but it i
Echenle un ojo http://vivalinux.com.ar/soft/lethe-0.1
una opción libre para matenimiento de cyber , salas de pc,
adiestramiento de uso linux etc.
saludos
DOWNLOAD!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@
Quoting Anton Zinoviev (an...@lml.bas.bg):
> Good to here this.
>
> Should I make small console-setup-mini-udeb without translations?
Well, I'm not sure we have a use case for it. The point of having no
translations is to make the udeb smaller but, as c-s udeb is included
in the initrd, that wo
tags 529475 patch
thanks
Quoting Christian Perrier (bubu...@debian.org):
> Both this bug and #528610 should probably be reassigned to passwd,
> severity critical (breaks other software).
>
> #528610 apparently has a workaround (using usermod) but there is
> apparently none for this bug
There's
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 529475 patch
Bug#529475: user-setup fails because -m option is no longer valid
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
33 matches
Mail list logo
