On Monday 06 April 2009, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> I see the path suggested in 4.4, but nothing about the partition.
OK. I've committed an additional change to cover that.
Cheers,
FJP
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
Quoting Christian Perrier (bubu...@debian.org):
>
> FOlks, here is the complete draft of a report of our important
> meetings, which I intend to send as a "Bits from the D-I team" mail in
> a few days.
This is your last chance to amend that text.
I plan sending it either today (Apr 8th) evening
To all D-I team members (which means anybody who listens to -boot and
cares enough about D-I), please remember that we planned a team
meeting on April 11th at 20:00 UTC.
Proposed topics:
- finish going through the release goals list (followup for March 30th
meeting)
- status of development and ea
debian-installer_20090123lenny1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
ftp.upload.debian.org
along with the files:
debian-installer_20090123lenny1.dsc
debian-installer_20090123lenny1.tar.gz
debian-installer_20090123lenny1_amd64.deb
debian-installer-images_20090123lenny1_amd64.tar.gz
Greet
debian-installer_20090123lenny1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debian-installer_20090123lenny1.dsc
debian-installer_20090123lenny1.tar.gz
debian-installer_20090123lenny1_amd64.deb
debian-installer-images_20090123lenny1_amd64.tar.gz
Greetings,
Nenolod: sorry for the other mail.
William Pitcock wrote:
On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 13:06 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:21 PM, William Pitcock
wrote:
Lilo upstream is dead (no release in quite a while), but the lilo
maintainer has also been seen as saying in various maili
Hi,
I've made some tests based on the patch proposed by Lunar. To fully
automate LVM over RAID setups, I've changed some parts of the
scripts :
1) Parted try to read a partition table on the RAID volume. I added a
commit.d script before parted to avoid that.
2) In the initial_auto_raid_lvm scrip
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> as grub was not really maintained. Also grub2 doesn't seems so fast in
> development.
> I think these kind of project have difficult to maintain motivated
> maintainer.
I would really love to own a computer that used coreboot, Linux a
As the silent co-maintainer of lilo I believe I should now voice my
thoughts on this
I too believe that lilo should belive that lilo should be remove *at
some point* but now is not the time. So I restate my willingness to
take over fully publicly. Upstream made a release of a bootloader in
2007 a
Mapping stable to proposed-updates.
Accepted:
debian-installer-images_20090123lenny1_amd64.tar.gz byhand
debian-installer_20090123lenny1.dsc
to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-installer_20090123lenny1.dsc
debian-installer_20090123lenny1.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-install
Hi,
I'm trying to install Debian on an amd64 machine using a USB stick and
the testing netinst from 8th April 2009. I want the 2.6.29-1 kernel (for
the ath9k module).
I got the built kernel package:
linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64_2.6.29-3~snapshot.13357_amd64.deb
Trouble is, my current function
Your message dated Wed, 08 Apr 2009 15:17:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#503040: fixed in debian-installer 20090123lenny1
has caused the Debian Bug report #503040,
regarding debian-installer: Build firmware for the DNS-323
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 11:05 -0400, Matt Arnold wrote:
> As the silent co-maintainer of lilo I believe I should now voice my
> thoughts on this
>
> I too believe that lilo should belive that lilo should be remove *at
> some point* but now is not the time. So I restate my willingness to
> take over
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 16:22 +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> Nenolod: sorry for the other mail.
>
> William Pitcock wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 13:06 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:21 PM, William Pitcock
> >> wrote:
> >>> Lilo upstream is dead (no release in
> I installed grub (and Debian). Trying the Windows hidden partition
> (to install windows), grub stopped working (it was rescue mode, but
> without capability to rescue something). Also rescue disk +
> reconfiguring + update-grub did nothing.
Err, did you re-run install-grub?
Samuel
--
To UNS
debian-installer_20070308etch5_ia64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debian-installer_20070308etch5_ia64.deb
debian-installer-images_20070308etch5_ia64.tar.gz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.d
Hi Frans!
* Frans Pop [2009-04-07 21:37]:
> On Tuesday 07 April 2009, Martin Wuertele wrote:
> > Data from /var/log/installer is available at
> > http://asteria.debian.or.at/~maxx/.var_log_installer.tar.gz
>
> The syslog shows:
> Mar 6 17:19:36 grub-installer: /boot is a lvm volume
> (/dev/ma
Mapping oldstable to oldstable-proposed-updates.
Accepted:
debian-installer-images_20070308etch5_ia64.tar.gz byhand
debian-installer_20070308etch5_ia64.deb
to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-installer_20070308etch5_ia64.deb
Changes: debian-installer (20070308etch5) oldstable; urgency=low
.
Samuel Thibault wrote:
>> I installed grub (and Debian). Trying the Windows hidden partition
>> (to install windows), grub stopped working (it was rescue mode, but
>> without capability to rescue something). Also rescue disk +
>> reconfiguring + update-grub did nothing.
>
> Err, did you re-run i
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 11:21:12AM -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
> Does this mean that you will become lilo upstream as well? Are you
> *qualified* to become lilo upstream? Do you know assembly language?
> (tip: most of the important parts are assembly language.)
> If not, then stop talking now. A
ltsp is blocked from migrating into testing, due to the ltsp-client-builder
udeb, though this udeb is not used by debian-installer by default, and has no
changes since the previous version.
it has been in unstable for 6 days without introducing new problems, and
includes several updated translatio
Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> ltsp is blocked from migrating into testing, due to the ltsp-client-builder
> udeb, though this udeb is not used by debian-installer by default, and has no
> changes since the previous version.
>
> it has been in unstable for 6 days without introducing new problems, and
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 11:05:43AM -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 08:53 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 10:13:32AM -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
> > > I agree here too. I think these install paths could be replaced by
> > > ext2linux as well, if that
On Wednesday 08 April 2009, Martin Wuertele wrote:
> * Frans Pop [2009-04-07 21:37]:
> > The syslog shows:
> > Mar 6 17:19:36 grub-installer: /boot is a lvm volume
> > (/dev/mapper/kronos0-root), cannot install grub
> >
> > Which is confirmed by the hardware summary, which does not show a
> > sep
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 523137 installation-reports
Bug#523137: Package: Debian 5.0.0 Lenny Net Install
Warning: Unknown package 'debian'
Warning: Unknown package '5.0.0'
Warning: Unknown package 'lenny'
Warning: Unknown package 'net'
Warning: Unknown package 'i
Giacomo Catenazzi, le Wed 08 Apr 2009 19:47:55 +0200, a écrit :
> Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >> I installed grub (and Debian). Trying the Windows hidden partition
> >> (to install windows), grub stopped working (it was rescue mode, but
> >> without capability to rescue something). Also rescue disk +
26 matches
Mail list logo