Quoting Pavel Piatruk (piatru...@gmail.com):
> Package: console-setup
> Version: 1.30
> Severity: wishlist
>
>
> Please update Belarusian debconf translation
Committed. I corrected the following:
> msgid ""
> "The configuration file /etc/default/console-setup specifies a keyboard "
> "layout ($
Your message dated Mon, 23 Mar 2009 00:22:38 -0700
with message-id <1237792958.31055.0.ca...@shawn-desktop.local>
and subject line Re: Bug#520581: debootstrap should create loopback network
interface
has caused the Debian Bug report #520581,
regarding debootstrap should create loopback network in
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #console-setup (1.29) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> #
> # * Debconf templates and debian/control reviewed by the debian-l10n-
> #english team as part of the Smith review project. Closes: #520375
> # * Debconf translations:
> #- Brazilian Por
Your message dated Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:52:49 -
with message-id <002101c9abad$e4f62bc0$2c958...@lbcamden.net>
and subject line Overtaken by dmraid support in Lenny
has caused the Debian Bug report #292221,
regarding d-i: mkinitrd STILL omits medley.o (see also #265424)
to be marked as done.
Th
Hi all,
my question is:
when does the installer have ext4 for installing?
thx
regards Marco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Your message dated Mon, 23 Mar 2009 21:11:47 +0900
with message-id <49c77c83.9070...@ubuntu.com>
and subject line Withdrawing the user-setup change that would use this
documentation
has caused the Debian Bug report #501863,
regarding Documentation for the proposed passwd/allow-password-empty pres
Your message dated Mon, 23 Mar 2009 21:15:28 +0900
with message-id <49c77d60.8000...@ubuntu.com>
and subject line Please don't apply this patch
has caused the Debian Bug report #501849,
regarding Please permit installation with an empty user password
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 8:56 AM, wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> my question is:
> when does the installer have ext4 for installing?
Not yet; we're adding the support for it but it will still
take a while to be complete.
partman got most of required parts already and we
are working with parted upstream
Hi,
At 22 Mar 09 18:23:53 GMT,
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Otavio Salvador [2009-03-21 17:02]:
> > This is the first proposal of patches to update our kernel to
> > 2.6.29. I belive we'll still have changes to do on this set of patches
> > before really commiting it but it would be nice if porter
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Kenshi Muto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At 22 Mar 09 18:23:53 GMT,
> Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>> * Otavio Salvador [2009-03-21 17:02]:
>> > This is the first proposal of patches to update our kernel to
>> > 2.6.29. I belive we'll still have changes to do on this set of patch
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:39:30PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 March 2009, Colin Watson wrote:
> > I just rather belatedly noticed that r53756 breaks console-setup (or at
> > least will once we switch to it and console-setup is installed by
> > debootstrap).
>
> BTW
> Do we really want
Package: console-setup
Severity: wishlist
Tags: l10n patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please include attached updated translation file fi.po to the package.
Regards,
Esko Arajärvi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAknH1FIACgkQejjRZhT
Hello,
while talking today with Otavio on #debian-release about the #520642
thread (I’ve Bin-NMUed pcre3/i386, btw, and dmraid will fix itself
becuase it’s seen a recent sourceful upload), the topic about udebs
depending on non-udebs came up. Otavio said:
18:28 dato: i belive that we could check
Hi,
On Montag, 23. März 2009, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> 18:28 dato: i belive that we could check for any non-udeb
>dependency. AFAIK no package should have them now.
Is that already the case for lenny or just for squeeze/sid? I'm asking cause
Debian Edu lenny is still in developmen
On Monday 23 March 2009, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> 18:28 dato: i belive that we could check for any non-udeb
>dependency. AFAIK no package should have them now.
Almost true, but not quite. See my early mails about getting rid of the
dependencies on libc6 and the udeb dependencies st
Could we also include this patch since 2.6.27+ supports Xen domU on
amd64 as well, this is the equivalent to r54357 for i386.
diff --git
a/packages/kernel/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/modules/amd64/nic-modules
b/packages/kernel/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/modules/amd64/nic-modules
index 2512e83..fe57
* Frans Pop [Mon, 23 Mar 2009 21:19:37 +0100]:
> On Monday 23 March 2009, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > 18:28 dato: i belive that we could check for any non-udeb
> >dependency. AFAIK no package should have them now.
> Almost true, but not quite. See my early mails about getting rid of
On 03/22/2009 10:45 AM, Geoff Levand wrote:
> On 03/21/2009 10:38 AM, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 04:40:51PM -0700, Geoff Levand wrote:
>>> 1) At boot there were some kernel I/O errors about /dev/sr0.
>>
>> That is the BD drive. Did you have a disc in the drive at that point?
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> Could we also include this patch since 2.6.27+ supports Xen domU on
> amd64 as well, this is the equivalent to r54357 for i386.
>
> diff --git
> a/packages/kernel/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/modules/amd64/nic-modules
> b/packages/kernel/linux-
Adeodato Simó wrote:
Hello,
while talking today with Otavio on #debian-release about the #520642
thread (I’ve Bin-NMUed pcre3/i386, btw, and dmraid will fix itself
becuase it’s seen a recent sourceful upload), the topic about udebs
depending on non-udebs came up. Otavio said:
18:28 dato: i bel
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 17:36 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > Could we also include this patch since 2.6.27+ supports Xen domU on
> > amd64 as well, this is the equivalent to r54357 for i386.
> >
> > diff --git
> > a/packages/kernel/linux-ker
On Monday 23 March 2009, Ian Campbell wrote:
> IIRC I was asked to add direct to i386 instead of adding to kernel
> wedge. Maybe that was because i386 was the only one back then though
> and for two arches kernel-wedge makes sense. The only other (currently)
> potential arch is ia64 though.
IMO ad
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 23:05 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 23 March 2009, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > IIRC I was asked to add direct to i386 instead of adding to kernel
> > wedge. Maybe that was because i386 was the only one back then though
> > and for two arches kernel-wedge makes sense. The onl
On Monday 23 March 2009, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 23:05 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Monday 23 March 2009, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > IIRC I was asked to add direct to i386 instead of adding to kernel
> > > wedge. Maybe that was because i386 was the only one back then
> > > thou
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: Minimal Netinst from CD-R
Image version:
http://laotzu.acc.umu.se/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-businesscard.iso
Date: 2009.03.22
Machine: Dell Precision 670
Processor: 2x Xeon 3.6 w/hyperthreading enabled
Memory:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 23 March 2009, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 23:05 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
>> > On Monday 23 March 2009, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> > > IIRC I was asked to add direct to i386 instead of adding to kernel
>> > > wedge. Maybe th
26 matches
Mail list logo
