Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version: debian-testing-amd64 2008-01-19
(http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-cd/debian-
testing-amd64-CD-1.iso)
Date: 2008-01-21 11:13AM
Machine: HP Compaq dx2450
Processor: AMD Athlon Dual Core Processor 5400B
Memory: 2G
Package: installation-reports
Followup-For: Bug #512427
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell:
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 02:11:34AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Saturday 10 January 2009, Colin Watson wrote:
> > I realised I'd forgotten about the kernel udebs (we do those
> > differently in Ubuntu so it slipped my mind). Should I just add ext4 to
> > kernel-wedge/modules/ext3-modules, by analog
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 02:29:14PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Christian Perrier writes:
> > If the ext4 support is a quite long term work, shouldn't it be
> > listed in the wiki
> > (http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/SqueezeGoals...which is
> > currently a copy of the Lenny goals list, w
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 09:09:13PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> It looks like the SVN repository itself is not corrupted, but unless
> someone has some very brilliant idea how to change history it does look
> as if we'll have to live with these extremely large files until the end
> of time.
We cou
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 02:51:41PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 January 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> > > --- trunk/packages/cdebconf-terminal/debian/control (original)
> > > +++ trunk/packages/cdebconf-terminal/debian/control Mon Jan 19
> > > 23:36:21 2009 @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
> > >
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: BOL (LAN/FAI) http://www.informatik.uni-koeln.de/fai/
Image version: Testing, i386
Date: 2008-01-21 13:20PM
Machine: HP Compaq dx2450
Processor: AMD Athlon Dual Core Processor 5400B
Memory: 2GB
Partitions:
Dateisystem Typ1K‐Blöcke Benutzt Verfügb
Frans Pop writes:
> On Wednesday 24 December 2008, Don Armstrong wrote:
>> It would be nice if you (or someone else) would then explain[1] why
>> having a limited set of d-i images + cd images which contained the
>> non-free firmware necessary for certain hardware to boot would be an
>> intractab
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 08:49:05PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 January 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Are there any objections?
>
> IMO it is useless to send them to everybody.
It would be nice to have them on IRC (they aren't right now, are they?).
You're the main person who foll
On Wednesday 21 January 2009, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 08:49:05PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Tuesday 20 January 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > > Are there any objections?
> >
> > IMO it is useless to send them to everybody.
>
> It would be nice to have them on IRC (they
cdebconf_0.138lenny2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cdebconf_0.138lenny2.dsc
cdebconf_0.138lenny2.tar.gz
cdebconf-priority_0.138lenny2_all.udeb
cdebconf_0.138lenny2_i386.deb
libdebconfclient0_0.138lenny2_i386.deb
libdebconfclient0-dev_0.138lenny2_i
FYI: The status of the quik-installer source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.0.21lenny3
Current version: 0.0.21lenny4
--
This email is automatically generated; the Debian Release Team
is responsible.
See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for
Accepted:
cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.138lenny2_i386.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.138lenny2_i386.udeb
cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.138lenny2_i386.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.138lenny2_i386.udeb
cdebconf-priority_0.138lenny2_all.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-
On Sunday 18 January 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 18 January 2009, Philip Hands wrote:
> > Having played with the -r option, I seem to have tracked down the
> > revision it's stressed about:
> >
> > p...@cold:~/src/debian-svn/d-i$ git svn fetch -r57093:57094
> > Checksum mismatch: trunk/p
Your message dated Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:18:53 +0100
with message-id <20090121171853.gb7...@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#512535: HP Compaq dx2450 Testing, BOL (LAN/FAI)
has caused the Debian Bug report #512535,
regarding HP Compaq dx2450 Testing, BOL (LAN/FAI)
to be marked as
Your message dated Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:17:28 +0100
with message-id <20090121171728.ga7...@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#512507: HP Compaq dx2450 Testing-AMD64 inst.-report
has caused the Debian Bug report #512507,
regarding HP Compaq dx2450 Testing-AMD64 inst.-report
to be m
Quoting Flamarion Jorge (flamarili...@yahoo.com.br):
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Package: console-setup
> Tags: l10n patch
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Please, Could you update the Brazilian Portuguese Translation?
When synced with what we have currently in SVN, 13 fuzzy s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> When synced with what we have currently in SVN, 13 fuzzy strings
> appear. Could you please complete the file and send it back to this
> bug report?
>
I do not understand, because the result of msgfmt was this:
$msgfmt -cvo /dev/null pt_BR.po
75
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21-01-2009 17:19, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Flamarion Jorge (flamarili...@yahoo.com.br):
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Package: console-setup
>> Tags: l10n patch
>> Severity: wishlist
>>
>> Please, Could you upda
> Can you confirm that a daily built image [1] does not have the problem?
Yes, I can confirm that the daily built image (22-Jan-2009 04:13, netinst) is
working perfectly fine.
(For search engines: the error at boot was: BUG Int 14: CR2 ffb41000)
Márton Drótos
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
Quoting Flamarion Jorge (flamarili...@yahoo.com.br):
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> > When synced with what we have currently in SVN, 13 fuzzy strings
> > appear. Could you please complete the file and send it back to this
> > bug report?
> >
>
> I do not understand, beca
Quoting Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) (f...@funlabs.org):
> I noticed that this is kept in D-I SVN, is this not
> listed in packages/po/sublevel* ? Since I'm keeping the
Because console-setup is not used by d-i as of now (actually, it's
used in Ubuntu, but translations aren't).
So, it
22 matches
Mail list logo
