Quoting Teddy Hogeborn (teddy+debb...@fukt.bsnet.se):
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dear debian-boot people; it was suggested to me that debian-boot might
> be a proper forum to ask for interested sponsors for our software
> package "Mandos", which we just released as versi
Hi mein Geiler, mein Name ist LUCCIA und bin ein zuckersuesses, gieriges
Maeuschen das nur ein bisschen spielen will - und zwar mit Dir! Wenn Du
willst das ich Dir verfalle, dann solltest Du lieb und anstaendig sein und
ein gewisses Maß an guten Manieren besitzen. Das wichtigste ist natuerlich,
das
Christian Perrier writes:
>> The installer wants to use 33% of diskspace which is 500 G I G A (!)
>> bytes as swap space
>
> I'm personnally not in position to do such tests (moreover it may
> require a knowledge of partman that I'm not usre to have).
For a start, I could reproduce it. Crypto
Here's a patch, and then we just need a new debconf template
partman-ext3/boot_not_bootable
Index: ext2_or_ext3_boot
===
--- ext2_or_ext3_boot (revision 55526)
+++ ext2_or_ext3_boot (working copy)
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
#!/bin/sh
-# Che
Even if I change in /lib/partman/recipes/30atomic
96 512 300% linux-swap
to
96 512 128 linux-swap
the size of the swap LV won't drop below 2.8 GB. Also, when it is
left as 300%, the final size does not depend on the size of the system
RAM (tested at 1024 and 128 MB).
--
Feri.
--
To UNSUBS
This is actually a bit more complicated than I expected. First of
all, /boot can only be on a RAID1 because the boot loader will fail to
load the kernel if another RAID type is used. And then we also have
to see which devices are part of the RAID1 and then make sure that
they are 1st primary part
* Gordon Farquharson [2008-11-23 20:03]:
> > Rod, Gordon, do you know what to do about this situation? I think RTC
> > works fine here, but what can we do in the case described by Devin?
>
> This problem didn't occur when I last checked the RC1 installer image.
> Sounds like a hardware problem.
We have a partman check that ensures on some devices that the /boot
partition is the 1st primary partition. Unfortunately this check
fails when /boot is a RAID device, but it's actually valid for /boot
to be a RAID1 device (as long as its physical partition is the 1st
primary partition).
There's
On the other hand, the pseudocode in
installer/doc/devel/partman-auto-recipe.txt gives reasonable results,
so its implementation is probably broken.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
oldsys-preseed_3.1_arm.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
oldsys-preseed_3.1.dsc
oldsys-preseed_3.1.tar.gz
oldsys-preseed_3.1_arm.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Accepted:
oldsys-preseed_3.1.dsc
to pool/main/o/oldsys-preseed/oldsys-preseed_3.1.dsc
oldsys-preseed_3.1.tar.gz
to pool/main/o/oldsys-preseed/oldsys-preseed_3.1.tar.gz
oldsys-preseed_3.1_arm.udeb
to pool/main/o/oldsys-preseed/oldsys-preseed_3.1_arm.udeb
Override entries for your package:
o
Your message dated Tue, 6 Jan 2009 18:33:02 +0100
with message-id <200901061833.03001.elen...@planet.nl>
and subject line Re: Bug#509775: Debian installer amd64 cannot complete
installation due to a lack of the system codename
has caused the Debian Bug report #509775,
regarding Debian installer a
* Rick Thomas [2008-12-31 17:02]:
>> noatime is a known wishlist that will be done after lenny, I guess.
>
> Does that mean that there's no way to specify it at install/partitioner
> time? Or that there's no way to specify it at all?
Okay, I was wrong. It's already possible to choose noatime a
On Tuesday 06 January 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
> I'm not sure you were properly directed. Despite its name, the
> debian-boot ML focuses on the development of the *installer* for
> Debian (D-I), not anything related to booting the system.
Agreed.
> So, I'm not completely sure that any of us
On Tuesday 30 December 2008, M.-A. DARCHE wrote:
> Comments/Problems:
> The installation could not go on due to the fact that the DHCP server
> from the SpeedTouch 530 router modem was not found. No lease could be
> obtained from it. I have retried many times, even providing a machine
> name along.
* Martin Michlmayr [2009-01-01 17:22]:
> * R. Zuidinga [2009-01-01 16:17]:
> > Jan 1 14:33:40 debootstrap: Setting up login (1:4.1.1-6) ...
> > Jan 1 14:33:43 debootstrap: dpkg (subprocess): unable to execute
> > post-installation script: Exec format error
> > Jan 1 14:33:43 debootstrap: dpkg
On Tuesday 06 January 2009, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Author: tbm
> Date: Tue Jan 6 17:26:29 2009
> New Revision: 57102
>
> Log:
> Don't preseed the hostname and domain name with default values
> because the information from DHCP no longer takes precedence.
I don't understand this. AFAICT neither
choose-mirror_2.28lenny1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
choose-mirror_2.28lenny1.dsc
choose-mirror_2.28lenny1.tar.gz
choose-mirror_2.28lenny1_all.udeb
choose-mirror-bin_2.28lenny1_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUB
On Tuesday 06 January 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 January 2009, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > Author: tbm
> > Date: Tue Jan 6 17:26:29 2009
> > New Revision: 57102
> >
> > Log:
> > Don't preseed the hostname and domain name with default values
> > because the information from DHCP no long
Accepted:
choose-mirror-bin_2.28lenny1_amd64.udeb
to pool/main/c/choose-mirror/choose-mirror-bin_2.28lenny1_amd64.udeb
choose-mirror_2.28lenny1.dsc
to pool/main/c/choose-mirror/choose-mirror_2.28lenny1.dsc
choose-mirror_2.28lenny1.tar.gz
to pool/main/c/choose-mirror/choose-mirror_2.28lenny1.
* Frans Pop [2009-01-06 20:03]:
> > > Don't preseed the hostname and domain name with default values
> > > because the information from DHCP no longer takes precedence.
> >
> > I don't understand this. AFAICT neither the behavior of dhcp nor that
> > of netcfg has changed in any way in the recent
Frans Pop a écrit :
> On Tuesday 30 December 2008, M.-A. DARCHE wrote:
>> Comments/Problems:
>> The installation could not go on due to the fact that the DHCP server
>> from the SpeedTouch 530 router modem was not found. No lease could be
>> obtained from it. I have retried many times, even providi
* Rick Thomas [2008-12-30 19:12]:
> One thing worth mentioning though: I have a full-service
> DHCP on this subnet, so it got the network parameters from
> DHCP. This was successful, but for some reason it decided
> that the DNS domain was "example.org", not the one being
> offered by DHCP. The t
20:36 < tbm> fjp: seems you're, as usual, right. Seems like I got
confused because my dhcp server only hands out the domain for most
hosts and I looked at the hostname in d-i
20:37 < tbm> but that makes me wonder about this bug report
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCR
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:36:09 +0100
Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
>
> So it's not that hard. Manually replacing foomatic-gui by
> system-config-printer gives:
>
> xfce:~# apt-get --no-install-recommends remove --purge foomatic-gui
> system-config-printer+
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building de
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 05:03:54PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Devin, I'm inclined to close this bug report since I believe that d-i
> is doing the right thing. There are reports that the clock sometimes
> gets "stuck" on the NSLU2, but I don't think Debian/debian-installer
> can do anything
Actually, regarding documentation for installing xfce d-i post-install,
if we had an appropriate aptitude or apt-get line for copy-and-paste,
that would make sense.
The problem I see is that the appropriate line depends on the language
selection (e.g. a welsh desktop should probably have ~t^welsh-
On mar, 2009-01-06 at 16:06 -0500, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> Perhaps it's only when one tries to install xfce after doing a
> standard
> install and not when using an xfce cd (that's when it showed up for
> me). So probably tasksel is fine, the problem is that if you apt-get
> or aptitude|select
Hello Chris,
[CC'ing debian-boot in case some other people are interested]
For DebConf8, it seems that you planned to give a talk about hardware
compatibility (according to penta).
That's also something I am planning to work on [for Squeeze], and I
wonder if you still plan to work on that?
As f
On Tuesday 06 January 2009, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Can you try with a /preseed.cfg file?
Tested. Results as posted on IRC: still works for me as always.
> Anyway, the change I made is based on observation. I'm not sure what has
> changed, but I'm fairly
> sure it worked with etch and I'm cer
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:48:37 +0100
Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On mar, 2009-01-06 at 16:06 -0500, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> > Perhaps it's only when one tries to install xfce after doing a
> > standard
> > install and not when using an xfce cd (that's when it showed up for
> > me). So probably t
Martin Michlmayr writes:
> 20:36 < tbm> fjp: seems you're, as usual, right. Seems like I got
> confused because my dhcp server only hands out the domain for most
> hosts and I looked at the hostname in d-i
> 20:37 < tbm> but that makes me wonder about this bug report
Could you then revert the c
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:48:37 +0100
Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
>
> Anyway, I'm *really* lost about where we are, what the problem really
> is, and what exactly we are wanting to do to solve it.
>
It occurs to me the reason you are confused is that when I 'Standard
System' you are thinking I mean
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20081029
Hi,
After I accidentally marked the "desktop environment" (or whatever the exact
name is) task and started downloading the packages there was no way I could
stop the download process. Ctrl+c, ctrl+z, escp, nothing worked, and sending
a SIGHUP, later
Package: debian-installer
Severity: minor
I was trying to install 'etch' with the 'lenny' dailies and I got
caught by the change in the way disks names are handled, ie preseeding
d-i partman-auto/disk string /dev/discs/disc0/disc
no longer works.
I was reading the partman docs and noticed a few
On mar, 2009-01-06 at 20:01 -0500, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
>
> It occurs to me the reason you are confused is that when I 'Standard
> System' you are thinking I mean 'typical system' when in fact I mean
> that I select the option 'Standard System' on the tasksel menu.
No I'm confused because you
oldsys-preseed_3.2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
oldsys-preseed_3.2.dsc
oldsys-preseed_3.2.tar.gz
oldsys-preseed_3.2_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
Accepted:
oldsys-preseed_3.2.dsc
to pool/main/o/oldsys-preseed/oldsys-preseed_3.2.dsc
oldsys-preseed_3.2.tar.gz
to pool/main/o/oldsys-preseed/oldsys-preseed_3.2.tar.gz
oldsys-preseed_3.2_i386.udeb
to pool/main/o/oldsys-preseed/oldsys-preseed_3.2_i386.udeb
Override entries for your package:
38 matches
Mail list logo
