reassign 510842 partman-base
forcemerge 505477 510842
found 510842 105
thanks
On Monday 05 January 2009, Roland Mas wrote:
> On selecting hda2, I get an error page telling me that this
> partition is used by LVM. The "Continue" option brings me back to the
> partitioner's menu, but the "Go back
On Monday 05 January 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 29 December 2008, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 02:19:16PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > Log:
> > > Disable backup while displaying device/partition locked errors; it
> > > makes no sense and it can cause us to exit witho
On lun, 2009-01-05 at 13:31 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 05 January 2009, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > > Reason is that tasksel makes use of the Task: fields in the Packages
> > > file, not the task files included in tasksel itself (which,
> > > simplified, are only used to update the Packag
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 510544
Bug#510544: Installer/partition guide tried to use 500GB as swap
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> reassign 510544 partman-auto-lvm
Bug#510544: Installer/partition guide tried to use 500GB as swap
Bug reassigned from package `
reopen 510544
reassign 510544 partman-auto-lvm
thanks
>> Well, this is a matter of taste and even sometimes religion..:-)
>
>> As nothing else went wrong (things were just not fitting your taste),
>> I therefore close this installation report.
>
>
> What ?
>
> The installer wants to use 33% of dis
Frans Pop writes:
> I've also tested the fix and backported it to the lenny branch. Should
> this be uploaded before RC2?
Hello,
First, I'd like to thank by you have synced the lenny branch..
Yes I think it could be uploaded asap. I see no reason to delay it
(except building time).
Since it
On Monday 05 January 2009, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > Reason is that tasksel makes use of the Task: fields in the Packages
> > file, not the task files included in tasksel itself (which,
> > simplified, are only used to update the Packages file).
>
> Ha, crap. And I guess the Task: order isn't re
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 510842 partman-base
Bug#510842: partman-lvm: Dead end when selecting a PV partition
Bug reassigned from package `partman-lvm' to `partman-base'.
> forcemerge 505477 510842
Bug#505477: partman hangs if you press "Go Back" after warning me
Package: partman-lvm
Severity: normal
I'm trying to install Lenny on a laptop which already has an existing
Etch setup as well as some room for Lenny using
debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso as downloaded on the 2nd of January
(MD5 is a3062399b5b68c7210b60b2ac84f26c1).
Current partition table looks
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 506406 minor
Bug#506406: xfce4: apt bug causes gdm to pull in unneeded/unwanted gnome
dependencies; can a dependency change fix this?
Severity set to `minor' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
severity 506406 minor
thanks
On Monday 05 January 2009, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> Well, testing the desktop task not really, especially if it uses
> Packages files. But we can test installing xdm on top of xfce4.
That's not sufficient. What would need to be tested is installing xdm and
xfce at
On Monday 05 January 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Yes I think it could be uploaded asap. I see no reason to delay it
> (except building time).
Done.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
partman-base_128lenny1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-base_128lenny1.dsc
partman-base_128lenny1.tar.gz
partman-base_128lenny1_amd64.udeb
partman-utils_128lenny1_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 07:58:28PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> severity 506406 minor
> thanks
>
> On Monday 05 January 2009, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > Well, testing the desktop task not really, especially if it uses
> > Packages files. But we can test installing xdm on top of xfce4.
>
> That's n
> Ok it seems that adding xfce4-session before gdm in the list enables
> apt-get and aptitude to satisfy the dependency on x-session-manager.
Unfortunately this cannot be fixed in tasksel this way. The order in which
packages are actually installed is not determined by the order in which
they ar
Accepted:
partman-base_128lenny1.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-base/partman-base_128lenny1.dsc
partman-base_128lenny1.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-base/partman-base_128lenny1.tar.gz
partman-base_128lenny1_amd64.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-base/partman-base_128lenny1_amd64.udeb
partman-utils_12
On lun, 2009-01-05 at 12:50 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Ok it seems that adding xfce4-session before gdm in the list enables
> > apt-get and aptitude to satisfy the dependency on x-session-manager.
>
> Unfortunately this cannot be fixed in tasksel this way. The order in which
> packages are actua
Your message dated Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:17:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#505477: fixed in partman-base 128lenny1
has caused the Debian Bug report #505477,
regarding partman-lvm: Dead end when selecting a PV partition
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
On Monday 05 January 2009, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> It should at one point run:
> tasksel install xfce-desktop
>
> But according to tasksel --test install xfce-desktop, in fact it should
> run:
> aptitude -q --without-recommends -o APT::Install-Recommends=no -y \
>install desktop gnome-de
Your message dated Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:17:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#505477: fixed in partman-base 128lenny1
has caused the Debian Bug report #505477,
regarding partman hangs if you press "Go Back" after warning message
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 02:41:11PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 29 December 2008, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 02:19:16PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > Log:
> > > Disable backup while displaying device/partition locked errors; it
> > > makes no sense and it can cause u
Hi! :)
I'm Marcos, member of Asturian Translators in Launchpad.
I collaborate in Ubuntu forums with the nick of gaiterin, I
development Gufw and I help translating Ubuntu and free software to
the asturian.
We will work to ensure that the installer will be in Asturian (ast code).
For us it's a dream
On Monday 29 December 2008, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 02:19:16PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Log:
> > Disable backup while displaying device/partition locked errors; it
> > makes no sense and it can cause us to exit without closing the FIFO
> > to parted_server (closes: #505
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #tasksel (2.78) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> #
> # * xfce-desktop: Apply patch from Yves-Alexis Perez
> #to include dbus-x11. Closes: #510300
> #
> package tasksel tasksel-data
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: tasksel tasksel-data
> tags 510300
Christian Perrier writes:
> Investigating this might be fairly tricky as it will be difficult to
> test our usual way (with virtual machines) as the size of the
> installation disk obviously matters here.
I fail to see the problem, virtual disks are the easiest to change
the size of. I'll try t
Package: tasksel
Version: 2.77
Severity: minor
It'd be useful to be able to set the desktop for tasksel after installing a
standard system (e.g. when not using an xfce cdrom but wanting xfce as the
desktop later). This also could help with preseeding a desktop that doesn't
use gnome but is di
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear debian-boot people; it was suggested to me that debian-boot might
be a proper forum to ask for interested sponsors for our software
package "Mandos", which we just released as version 1.0.3.
It builds these binary packages:
mandos - a server
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 13:31:59 +0100
Frans Pop wrote:
>
> > > Would replacing gdm by xdm solve the problem (see #510422)?
> >
> > Well, I guess so.
>
> Could you (or someone else from the desktop teams) test this?
I'm just the user who reported the bug (though I hope at some point to
become a DD)
On lun, 2009-01-05 at 22:55 -0500, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 13:31:59 +0100
> Frans Pop wrote:
>
> >
> > > > Would replacing gdm by xdm solve the problem (see #510422)?
> > >
> > > Well, I guess so.
> >
> > Could you (or someone else from the desktop teams) test this?
>
> I'
Quoting Ferenc Wagner (wf...@niif.hu):
> Christian Perrier writes:
>
> > Investigating this might be fairly tricky as it will be difficult to
> > test our usual way (with virtual machines) as the size of the
> > installation disk obviously matters here.
>
> I fail to see the problem, virtual dis
30 matches
Mail list logo
