Op 20081121 om 15:02 schreef Otavio Salvador:
> Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > (That the daily d-i build of Sparc failed on 20 november due
> > gzip: ./tmp/netboot/vmlinuz-2.6.26-1-sparc64: not in gzip format
> > is something else ( next automatic build is at 12:00 UTC ))
>
>
Tisztelt Hölgyem / Uram!
Cégünk a Balla Ingatlaniroda ingatlanok közvetítésével foglalkozik kizárólag
Budapest IX., X., XIV., XV., XVIII., XIX. és XX. kerületében, már kilenc éve és
már összesen 6 irodánkkal állunk Ügyfeleink rendelkezésére.
Szolgáltatásunk vevőknek TELJESEN INGYENES.
Eladók
Hi,
I've just confirmed using the daily build netinst that getting
firmware file from a USB stick works.
Thanks.
--
Jurij Smakov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03CC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM
On Sunday 23 November 2008, Geert Stappers wrote:
> Op 20081121 om 15:02 schreef Otavio Salvador:
> > Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > (That the daily d-i build of Sparc failed on 20 november due
> > > gzip: ./tmp/netboot/vmlinuz-2.6.26-1-sparc64: not in gzip format
> > > is somet
On Sunday 23 November 2008, I wrote:
> Someone needs to trace the actual cause of the problem here. Why is the
> kernel no longer getting compressed or not getting compressed
> correctly?
Seems to me this is a in the kernel we take from the linux-image package
and thus a bug or change in linux-2.
On Sunday 23 November 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 23 November 2008, I wrote:
> > Someone needs to trace the actual cause of the problem here. Why is
> > the kernel no longer getting compressed or not getting compressed
> > correctly?
>
> Seems to me this is a in the kernel we take from the l
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 05:15:58PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 23 November 2008, I wrote:
> > Someone needs to trace the actual cause of the problem here. Why is the
> > kernel no longer getting compressed or not getting compressed
> > correctly?
> Seems to me this is a in the kernel we tak
On Sunday 23 November 2008, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 05:15:58PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Sunday 23 November 2008, I wrote:
> > > Someone needs to trace the actual cause of the problem here. Why is
> > > the kernel no longer getting compressed or not getting compressed
>
(No need to CC me on replies.)
On Sunday 23 November 2008, you wrote:
> GNOME and KDE desktops both has Network-Manager installed by default.
> It would be good if XFCE and LXDE could also have Network-Manager or
> something similar installed by default. Cause I felt these lightweight
> desktops a
* Devin Carraway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-19 13:31]:
> Timezone setup was fine, but the system RTC does not appear to be running,
> so attempts to write to the hardware clock (which require an RTC poll)
> failed, causing a brief (but properly detected by the installer) hang.
> Installed files w
Frans Pop wrote:
> There are two images available for testing:
> - lxde CD:
> http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/fjp/debian-50-i386-lxde-CD.iso
> - light desktop CD:
> http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/fjp/debian-50-i386-light-CD.iso
Wow! I am so glad to see this come true. :
On Sun, Nov 23 2008, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 05:15:58PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
>> On Sunday 23 November 2008, I wrote:
>> > Someone needs to trace the actual cause of the problem here. Why is the
>> > kernel no longer getting compressed or not getting compressed
>> > correc
On Sun, Nov 23 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 23 November 2008, Bastian Blank wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 05:15:58PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
>> > On Sunday 23 November 2008, I wrote:
>> > > Someone needs to trace the actual cause of the problem here. Why is
>> > > the kernel no longer ge
On Sat, 2008-11-22 at 13:56 +0100, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 03:31:42PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > Jérémy are you OK with me reverting r55059. According to #464962 the
> > issue is fixed in the kernel with 2.6.26-8.
>
> Please do so…
Thanks. I've committed it now. I'm not
Hi,
I looked into it, and here's what I get on my SunBlade 1000 when I
boot using serial console:
~ # dmesg | grep -i console
[0.00] console [earlyprom0] enabled
[ 53.918290] Console: colour dummy device 80x25
[ 53.971361] console handover: boot [earlyprom0] -> real [tty0]
[ 59
severity 504721 serious
thanks
On Sunday 23 November 2008, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> So, the problem is that reopen-console gives preference to the value
> in 'console handover' line, which is incorrect on sparc (refers to a
> real terminal console even if one is connecting through serial).
As serial
On Sunday 23 November 2008, Ian Campbell wrote:
> Author: ijc-guest
> Date: Sun Nov 23 22:08:40 2008
> New Revision: 56775
>
> Log:
> base-installer 1.98 has been uploaded already so move my entry to new
> 1.99.
Please do so correctly:
- The new entry is missing a proper signature.
- The old entry
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 504721 serious
Bug#504721: Console broken on debian-installer on Sparc LDOM
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adm
Package: kernel-package
Version: 11.0011
Severity: serious
Tags: d-i
Justification: kernels built using this break sparc D-I builds
Daily builds of D-I for sparc have been failing with:
gzip: ./tmp/netboot/vmlinuz-2.6.26-1-sparc64: not in gzip format
This has been traced to the fact that the kern
On Sunday 23 November 2008, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 23 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Sunday 23 November 2008, Bastian Blank wrote:
> >> sparc still uses kernel-package for building, so I would not count
> >> on anything.
> >
> > Right. So RC bug there.
>
> File it, with detail
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A new idea that Steve suggested was to make the i386 and amd64 DVDs, and
> if possible also the i386/amd64 multi-arch DVD (with or without powerpc
> depending on space), support *all four* desktops. This would be
> implemented a bit differently, namely by
Ian Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> base-installer (1.98) unstable; urgency=low
>
>[ Colin Watson ]
>* Add support for AMD CPU families 16 (Phenom) and 17 (Griffin/Puma) on
> i386 (thanks, Roger Mach and Soren Hansen).
>
> - [ Ian Campbell ]
> - * Use -686 kernels for
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 10:28, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Devin Carraway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-19 13:31]:
>> Timezone setup was fine, but the system RTC does not appear to be running,
>> so attempts to write to the hardware clock (which require an RTC poll)
>> failed, ca
On Monday 24 November 2008, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Could you provide more detail, please? This is not enough to
> indicate where the fault lies. At a minimum, the kernel package
> invocation line, and the full logs of the build where failure was
> noticed should be provided to the bug
On Monday 24 November 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Ian Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > base-installer (1.98) unstable; urgency=low
> >
> >[ Colin Watson ]
> >* Add support for AMD CPU families 16 (Phenom) and 17
> > (Griffin/Puma) on i386 (thanks, Roger Mach and Soren Hansen).
>
25 matches
Mail list logo
