Hi!
I have to apologize: I'm not used to mailing lists as I am able to solve
the most problems myself or with the help of my good old friend google.
So here's some additional information: I'm using Lenny and got the kernel
and initrd from
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/lenny/main/install
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 08:06:43AM +0200, Grégory Oestreicher wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:19:20PM +0200, Grégory Oestreicher wrote:
> > I was planning to have another look at it soon, but if you have the time
> > to update and test it before that, that would indeed be great. :)
>
> Well
On Wednesday 23 July 2008, Joey Hess wrote:
> Frans Pop wrote:
> > You change has not yet be committed though, so this could be taken
> > along. It would just be:
> > ls -1 /sys/class/net | grep -v "^lo$"
>
> I like keeping bugfixes separate from potential bug introduction. :-)
> And your code
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Josselin Mouette wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> please allow pango1.0 1.20.5-1 and glib2.0 2.16.4-2 migrate to testing.
>>> Both have important bugfixes.
>> Both need ack from debian-boot
>
> No objection
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To
package: hw-detect
severity: wishlist
tags: patch l10n
--
brother
http://frakalendern.se# THIS FILE IS GENERATED AUTOMATICALLY FROM THE D-I PO MASTER FILES
# The master files can be found under packages/po/
#
# DO NOT MODIFY THIS FILE DIRECTLY: SUCH CHANGES WILL BE LOST
#
# THIS FILE IS AUTOMATIC
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 12:49:39PM -0700, Ryan Niebur wrote:
> here are the patches
A test image of the patches applied on top of the rework of MD devices
initialisation is available at:
http://people.debian.org/~lunar/d-i+md_love+raid6_10-mini.iso
Due to disk space constraints (*sigh*) I was n
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 09:26:12PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Saturday 19 July 2008, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> > I have quickly reviewed all bug reports against these two packages and
> > no bugs seem to mention this issue. Either the relevant installation
> > reports were not sorted correctly or w
Your message dated Thu, 24 Jul 2008 14:26:12 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#492178: [INTL:sv] Swedish strings for cdrom-detect
debconf
has caused the Debian Bug report #492178,
regarding [INTL:sv] Swedish strings for cdrom-detect debconf
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Thu, 24 Jul 2008 14:26:34 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#492188: [INTL:sv] Swedish strings for hw-detect debconf
has caused the Debian Bug report #492188,
regarding [INTL:sv] Swedish strings for hw-detect debconf
to be marked as done.
This me
Hello,
I'am a debian administrator, and I want to use netboot.
I've two questions.
First:
Recently I found documentationd wich explain how to create debian-installer
from source with SSH and pressed :
http://www.pckult.net/tutoriaux/23-linux/1135-installer-debian-sur-une-machine-distante-avec
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 01:13:06AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
>
> > In addition 1.41.0 closed a large number of bugs over 1.40.11, and is
> > the first version to have ext4 support.
Btw, a version of GRUB 2 with ext4dev support was just uploaded
(1.96+20080717-1).
--
Robert Millan
I know my
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 04:27:24PM +0200, Davide Viti wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 02:04:59AM +0200, J??r??my Bobbio wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 08:04:29PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > > That is still with the to-much-reduced font udeb, isn't it? Or did Davide
> > > already provide a new
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 07:10:38PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 July 2008, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> > If you want to have a look, I have updated the test image at:
> > http://people.debian.org/~lunar/g-i+terminal-mini.iso
> >
> > I am quite happy with the result. :)
>
> Yes, much more n
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 03:34:26PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 01:13:06AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> >
> > > In addition 1.41.0 closed a large number of bugs over 1.40.11, and is
> > > the first version to have ext4 support.
>
> Btw, a version of GRUB 2 with ext4dev s
On Thursday 24 July 2008, Theodore Tso wrote:
> I wouldn't dream of asking debian-boot to support ext4dev at this late
> date --- but there is one thing I would ask. As I recall, there was a
> temporary fix to force to use of 128 byte inodes for the interim etch
> release of the d-i. Could we mak
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 06:02:37PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 24 July 2008, Theodore Tso wrote:
> > I wouldn't dream of asking debian-boot to support ext4dev at this late
> > date --- but there is one thing I would ask. As I recall, there was a
> > temporary fix to force to use of 128 b
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 03:26:27PM +0100, Jon Thackray wrote:
> Despite the fact that my system is using what is now a relatively well
> known Intel motherboard, the netinst could not find CDROM drivers. The
> CDROM is a standardr IDE CDROM, designed by Toshiba/Samsung, model SH-C522.
> The moth
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:58:39AM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 03:34:26PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 01:13:06AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > >
> > > > In addition 1.41.0 closed a large number of bugs over 1.40.11, and is
> > > > the first ve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As all mac80211 drivers will have this problem, I have made a few more
changes in netcfg. When iw_get_basic_config is called, the current freq
is stored. Non mac80211 drivers appear to ignore this after a trigger to
associate, but mac80211 drivers appe
Jérémy Bobbio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [4] NACK
> [3] Further discussions after Lenny is released
> [1] Merge now, including cdebconf-gtk-terminal in the gtk initrd
> [2] Merge now, loading cdebconf-gtk-terminal on demand
>
> I would tick the third one myself. As far as I have seen, the
Frans Pop wrote:
> No. With '-1' you don't get trailing slashes for directories.
FWIW, that's a busyboxism. I'd use find.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
John Reiser wrote:
> Many executables used by the installer depend on libgcc_s.so. Searching for
> this library (by ld-linux.so just after execve) takes more than 1% of install
> time. The search tries:
>2375 open("/lib/tls/libgcc_s.so.1", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT
>2373 open("/lib/fast-mult/
There is already discussion about how to speed up partman elsewhere in
the BTS.
Minor shell efficiency tricks are not going to help much. It forks
*thousands* of processes per menu.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Joey Hess wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>time perl -e 'for (1..16625) { open(IN, "/no/file") }'
>
> 0.03user 0.03system 0:00.06elapsed 96%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
>
> So for a typical install on modern hardware, these 16 thousand extra syscalls
> use less than 0.1 second.
>
> I
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.34
# via tagpending
#
# hw-detect (1.65) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * ethdetect: Some modules do not request firmware until their interface
#has been brought up. So up and down every interface so missing firmware
#can be d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.34
> # via tagpending
> #
> # hw-detect (1.65) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> #
> # * ethdetect: Some modules do not request firmware until their interface
> #has been brought up. So up a
On Thursday 24 July 2008, Joey Hess wrote:
> Frans Pop wrote:
> > No. With '-1' you don't get trailing slashes for directories.
>
> FWIW, that's a busyboxism.
And bashism too then...
> I'd use find.
Yes, I thought of that. I dislike having to restrict depth but it would
allow to explicitly sel
On Sunday 20 July 2008, Ryan Niebur wrote:
> here are the patches
Other than the comments below and final testing this looks ready for
committing to me.
Please also test creating (and deleting) multiple RAID devices in the
same "configure RAID" session, for example RAID1 for /boot + RAID5 for
* Jordi Mallach [Thu, 24 Jul 2008 21:07:34 +0200]:
> Hi,
Hi Jordi,
> I'm requesting a freeze exception for nano 2.0.7-3, when current in
> lenny is 2.0.7-1.
Ok; nano is not frozen because of the freeze (yet), but just because it
produces an udeb. Thanks for the detailed explanations, though :),
One more...
Patch 1:
+ let SELECTED++
I don't think we use that syntax anywhere else in D-I, at least I cannot
remember seeing it. Please use 'SELECTED=$(($SELECTED + 1))' instead.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.34
> # via tagpending
> #
> # hw-detect (1.65) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> #
> # * check-missing-firmware: Check that debs are the right architecture before
> #trying to use them. Clos
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.34
# via tagpending
#
# hw-detect (1.65) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * check-missing-firmware: Check that debs are the right architecture before
#trying to use them. Closes: #492249
#
package archdetect hw-detect ethdetect dis
d. Tests on the i386 netboot mini.iso dated
20080724-19:33 were positive about it. :)
Cheers,
--
Jérémy Bobbio.''`.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: :Ⓐ : # apt-get install anarchism
`. `'`
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.34
> # via tagpending
> #
> # hw-detect (1.65) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> #
> # * post-base-installer: If dpkg fails to install a firmware package, likely
> #because it has dependenci
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.34
# via tagpending
#
# hw-detect (1.65) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * post-base-installer: If dpkg fails to install a firmware package, likely
#because it has dependencies outside base, remove it rather than leaving
#the d
John Reiser wrote:
> First, avoid searching for "cat" every time. The default search tries:
>/usr/local/sbin/cat
>/usr/local/bin/cat
>/usr/sbin/cat
>/usr/bin/cat
>/sbin/cat
> before finding /bin/cat. Instead: use 'which' or 'type' to do the search
> once,
> assign the result
On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 12:35 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 July 2008, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > I've attached a patch which implements this and would appreciate any
> > comments. In particular I'm pretty sure dumping xm-debian.cfg into
> > build/config/i386 is not the right place -- any sugg
Hello,
By chance, do you already know what will be the URL for etch-n-half
netboot image ?
This is for di-netboot-assistant's di-source.list.
Franklin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joey Hess wrote:
> Conclusion 2: Benchmark before optimising. In this case, trying to
> optimise away the wrong system calls is a waste of time.
The benchmark code and measurements [snipped] are not a good comparison
with the actual environment of low-memory mode. In particular, the use of
swap
oops, I meant to send this to debian-boot.
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 02:59:17PM -0700, Ryan Niebur wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 09:45:26PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > One more...
> >
> > Patch 1:
> > + let SELECTED++
> >
> > I don't think we use that syntax anywhere else in
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 09:39:15PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 20 July 2008, Ryan Niebur wrote:
> > here are the patches
>
> Other than the comments below and final testing this looks ready for
> committing to me.
>
yay!
> Please also test creating (and deleting) multiple RAID devices
John Reiser wrote:
> The benchmark code and measurements [snipped] are not a good comparison
> with the actual environment of low-memory mode. In particular, the use of
> swap space is likely in low memory mode, but almost certainly not present
> in the measurements reported above. Any actual use
Joey Hess wrote:
>>Consider this shell code:
>>which runs in 22.2 seconds on my NSLU2 for 1000 executions of "cat /dev/null"
>>in an environment much more similar to real partman than previous benchmarks.
>>Changing to "PATH=/bin " runs in 21.5 seconds, which is 0.7 seconds faster.
>>Altering the
John Reiser wrote:
> Partman runs very slowly. It reflects poorly on debian-installer.
Humans percieve interactive things as "slow" if they take longer than
approximatly 0.1 seconds to respond. Increasing the speed of partman by
less than 50% is not going to yield a difference that is percievable
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 07:28:41PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Or one could teach busybox shell to jump to the in-busybox
> implementations of cat and all other busybox commands, thereby
> eliminating every exec in partman except for those needed to run
> subshells. (It'd still have to fork, but linu
45 matches
Mail list logo
