On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 01:24:28AM +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> Both network and block drivers are loaded automatically and no other
> components require, as far as I have seen, further modifications.
> grub-installer has been taught about virtio block devices by Colin in
> r52925.
virtio_pci is
Hi!
Attached is a patchset adding support for virtio net and block devices.
There is only three small patches:
* a new "virtio-modules" package is added to kernel-wedge,
* virtio-modules is built for i386 (and should be added in the future
to other architectures supported by qemu),
* a smal
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 488687 partman-crypto: Broken if more than 1 encrypted partition
Bug#488687: partman-crypto: Broken when using multiple disks
Changed Bug title to `partman-crypto: Broken if more than 1 encrypted
partition' from `partman-crypto: Broken when usi
retitle 488687 partman-crypto: Broken if more than 1 encrypted partition
thanks
Also, it already break when just using more than one partition on the
same disk.
In that case, only the *first* partition with a passphrase got the
passphrase properly assigned, and all other encrypted partitions are
Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Please unblock expat 2.0.1-4. It has been in unstable for 25 days now
> without any bug report. Objections?
>
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/e/expat.html
> http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/e/expat/current/changelog
Cc-ing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] as it contains
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Usually I netboot Sparc computers for installation.
With 'qemu-system-sparc' I haven't a working networkboot yet.
(I even don't known if it is possible)
So I wanted to try an install from CD inside Qemu Sparc.
With http://people.debian.org/~s
partman-base_122_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-base_122.dsc
partman-base_122.tar.gz
partman-base_122_amd64.udeb
partman-utils_122_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Accepted:
partman-base_122.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-base/partman-base_122.dsc
partman-base_122.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-base/partman-base_122.tar.gz
partman-base_122_amd64.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-base/partman-base_122_amd64.udeb
partman-utils_122_amd64.udeb
to pool/main/p/partma
Geert Stappers wrote:
> With http://people.debian.org/~stappers/d-i/sparc/daily/mini.iso
> I get these errors:
>
> Your imagename `install' and arguments `' have either wrong syntax,
> or describe a label which is not present in silo.conf
Based on qemu's man page, I think that qemu-system-sparc
Hi!
As NTP packets can be blocked by a wrong network configuration (or not
working well within qemu "user" network emulation), having to wait 30
seconds until rdate failure can sometime be a little frustrating.
These two patchs allow NTP synchronisation to be canceled in the
installer.
The first
On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 08:20:05PM +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> I am fairly confident in those changes and I have tested them for a
> while already.
*ahem* I spoke too quickly.
The handling of alignement in text and newt frontends for multibyte
strings was broken in the previous patches.
This
Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> The first patch is against rdate, and adds, when -vv is specified on the
> command-line, the output of single dot (".") for each NTP query sent.
>
> The second patch modifies clock-setup to use these dots in order to
> step the progress bar on each of these dots. In case of
Op 06-07-2008 om 13:22 schreef Joey Hess:
> Geert Stappers wrote:
> > With http://people.debian.org/~stappers/d-i/sparc/daily/mini.iso
> > I get these errors:
> >
> > Your imagename `install' and arguments `' have either wrong syntax,
> > or describe a label which is not present in silo.conf
>
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version: debian-40r3-i386-netinst.iso
Date: 2008 June 6
Machine: IBM Thinkpad T42
Processor: Pentium M 1.8 GHz
Memory: 1.5 GB
Partitions: installed on an unpartitioned 4 GB USB flash drive
Output of lspci -knn (or lspci -nn): (irrelevant)
Base
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: hd-media, netinst
Image version:
http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-i386/current/images/hd-media/boot.img.gz
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/lenny_di_beta2/i386/iso-cd/debian-LennyBeta2-i386-netinst.iso
Date: 2008-07-06
Mach
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 01:57:05PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> > The first patch is against rdate, and adds, when -vv is specified on the
> > command-line, the output of single dot (".") for each NTP query sent.
> >
> > The second patch modifies clock-setup to use these dots i
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 11:49:22PM +0200, Michael Kesper wrote:
> network card (r1000?) isn't detected
> module r8169 is loaded and chokes, see syslog
You forgot to attach it, it seems…
Cheers,
--
Jérémy Bobbio.''`.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: :Ⓐ : # apt-get
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 12:04:54PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > I decided to go directly to 2.6.26 for s390 which is estimated for the
>> > next days.
>> Pl
Bastian Blank wrote:
> Nope. You blocked it already for 3 months.
This seems to imply that:
- linux-2.6 has been ready to migrate to testing for 3 months.
IIRC I check its excuses fairly regularly and until recently it's
had RC bugs keeping it out.
- d-i somehow blocked the kernel from migrat
Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 05:19:43PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Hello,
>
> Hi Otavio,
>
>> Latest kernel-wedge has been uploaded today to sid and we should start
>> the updating the installer to 2.6.25 kernel. I have uploaded the
>> packages for
Jérémy Bobbio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 11:49:22PM +0200, Michael Kesper wrote:
>> network card (r1000?) isn't detected
>> module r8169 is loaded and chokes, see syslog
>
> You forgot to attach it, it seems…
gziped, please
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O
Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> > However, what about #436497? Until that's fixed, any use of PROGRESS
> > commands while the clock could potentially be moved backwards can cause
> > newt to hang. Hmm, looks like there's a new newt upstream that fixes
> > this.
>
> As PROGRESS is only sent when a '.' is re
22 matches
Mail list logo
