Hi,
I did a test installation with the i386 netinst image (sorry,
only lowmem install), and it went completely fine. Logs attached.
Only one note: on the F1 help screen the disc reports beeing
a debian 5.0 installation medium. This should be something like
4.0 rX, right?
--
Kind regards
Hol
On Wednesday 30 April 2008, Joey Hess wrote:
> Frans Pop wrote:
> > IMO a difference of 4 MB is not really worth the testing effort, nor
> > does it make any real difference to users. So I propose to just get rid
> > of the distinction between lowmem level 1 and 2.
>
> The only reason I can see to
On Wednesday 30 April 2008, Holger Wansing wrote:
> I did a test installation with the i386 netinst image (sorry,
> only lowmem install), and it went completely fine. Logs attached.
Thanks.
> Only one note: on the F1 help screen the disc reports beeing
> a debian 5.0 installation medium. This sh
You are invited to "PLEASE CONTACT ME (click no RSVP to view my message).".
By your host David Sam:
Date: Wednesday April 30, 2008
Time: 5:00 am - 6:00 am (GMT +00:00)
Will you attend? RSVP to this invitation at:
http://calendar.yahoo.com/sam.d020?v
Package: debian-installer
Version: Lenny (snapshot of 25 april 2008)(netinst)
Severity: normal
Note that I have had the exact same error before and that was fixed a while
after. But now it came back (Regression?). Here's the deal: I install debian
from the (daily generated) netinst image using
On Sun, 2008-04-27 at 12:30 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> Shall I define a new environment variable ${DI_FLAVOUR} passed to the
> base-installer/kernel scripts containing the kernel suffix (i.e. -486
> vs -686-bigmem) or ...
Something like this? (only tested with the tests in the tree so far not
a
On Wednesday 30 April 2008, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-04-27 at 12:30 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > Shall I define a new environment variable ${DI_FLAVOUR} passed to the
> > base-installer/kernel scripts containing the kernel suffix (i.e. -486
> > vs -686-bigmem) or ...
>
> Something like
Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ferenc Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> Do you have any disk with sector size bigger then 512 bytes for
>>> testing? ramdisk is not the best way of doing that.
>>
>> RAID1 of two ramdisks... :) Jokes aside, fdisk says it has sector
>> size 102
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wednesday 30 April 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Because ramdisks cannot be opened with O_DIRECT and lastest parted
>> needs it. This has been done long time ago to avoid some sync problems
>> with disks.
>
> Ferenc: can fdisk open /dev/ram devices and
On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 10:39 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 April 2008, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Sun, 2008-04-27 at 12:30 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > Shall I define a new environment variable ${DI_FLAVOUR} passed to the
> > > base-installer/kernel scripts containing the kernel su
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> block 470894 with 460843
Bug#460843: please support additional options to use with the default boot
option
Bug#470894: grub-installer: user parameters are not added to grub.cfg for g
Ferenc Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Ferenc Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Do you have any disk with sector size bigger then 512 bytes for
testing? ramdisk is not the best way of doing that.
>>>
>>> RAID1 of two ramdisks... :
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wednesday 30 April 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Because ramdisks cannot be opened with O_DIRECT and lastest parted
>> needs it. This has been done long time ago to avoid some sync problems
>> with disks.
>
> Ferenc: can fdisk open /dev/ram devices and
On Monday 14 April 2008, Joey Hess wrote:
> Last month syslinux got submenu support for vesamenu, so its now doable..
>
> Here's an example image with menu items for text and gtk:
> http://kitenet.net/~joey/tmp/mini.iso
That looks a _lot_ more usable.
I think I'd still prefer:
Install
Install (gr
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Monday 14 April 2008, Joey Hess wrote:
>> Last month syslinux got submenu support for vesamenu, so its now doable..
>>
>> Here's an example image with menu items for text and gtk:
>> http://kitenet.net/~joey/tmp/mini.iso
>
> That looks a _lot_ more usable
clone 474698 -1
reassign -1 parted
block 474698 -1
retitle -1 fully support >512-byte sector size
thanks
Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> You also have not really answered the question whether the use of
>> PED_SECTOR_SIZE_DEFAULT in parted_server is correct at all.
>
> Yes and no.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 474698 -1
Bug#474698: partman-base: Inconsistent output if sector size != 512 bytes
Bug 474698 cloned as bug 478735.
> reassign -1 parted
Bug#478735: partman-base: Inconsistent output if sector size != 512 bytes
Bug reassigned from package `partm
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> I'd like to know when Joey plans to commit it. Joey?
I've been holding off for review. Now that we're happy with it except
for some minor string changes and reorganisation (which should be
doable without a lot of pain, I think, although there are certian
types of reorganis
Is there any chance of producing an "Etch+0.5" test image for
PowerPC? I'd love to run it through my testing farm.
Enjoy!
Rick
On Apr 30, 2008, at 3:34 AM, Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 30 April 2008, Holger Wansing wrote:
I did a test installation with the i386 netinst image (sorry,
only
Frans Pop wrote:
> I don't really see that having lowmem 1 or 2 makes that big a difference
> from a user perspective. Users with boxes with that little memory will
> probably be savvy enough to handle lowmem 2 anyway.
Not installing standard priority udebs by default is still a big
usability is
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 09:01:18PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Package: grub-installer
> Version: 1.29
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I did an install from debian.exe with d-i dailies to install sid
> (#473364). Unfortunately the /etc/grub.d/30_otheros that was generated
>
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:38:56PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> This patch gets rid of the problem [...]
argh. There was supposed to be a patch...
--
Robert Millan
I know my rights; I want my phone call!
What use is a phone call… if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)
Index: grub-in
Hello folks,
I believe I have found a bug in the Lenny installer on UltraSPARC. This
is during the partitioning phase. I can specify the partitions just
fine. However, when I'm done, and I choose "Finish partitioning and
write changes to disk", I get back to the "Partition Disks: This is an
ov
On Thursday 01 May 2008, Terrell Prude' Jr. wrote:
> main-menu[701]: INFO:
> (process:18081): /lib/partman/check.d/05silo_check: .: line 10: can't
> open /lib/partman/definitions.sh
> main-menu[701]: INFO:
> (process:18081): /lib/partman/check.d/05silo_check: .: line 10: can't
> open /lib/partma
silo-installer_1.14_sparc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
silo-installer_1.14.dsc
silo-installer_1.14.tar.gz
silo-installer_1.14_sparc.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
Accepted:
silo-installer_1.14.dsc
to pool/main/s/silo-installer/silo-installer_1.14.dsc
silo-installer_1.14.tar.gz
to pool/main/s/silo-installer/silo-installer_1.14.tar.gz
silo-installer_1.14_sparc.udeb
to pool/main/s/silo-installer/silo-installer_1.14_sparc.udeb
Override entries for your
Hi Rick,
On Wednesday 30 April 2008, Rick Thomas wrote:
> Is there any chance of producing an "Etch+0.5" test image for
> PowerPC? I'd love to run it through my testing farm.
Technically I could, but I'm not sure that I want to.
First, it is quite a lot of work because of all the different kern
OK.
Would it be helpful if I did an Etch install then "aptitude dist-
upgrade" on as many Mac architectures as I can? I don't have any non-
Mac PowerPC machines, so I can't try the oddball kernel versions
anyway. Is there anybody else out there who does?
Rick
On Apr 30, 2008, at 10:12 PM
(There's really no need to CC me on d-boot mail!)
On Thursday 01 May 2008, Rick Thomas wrote:
> Would it be helpful if I did an Etch install then "aptitude dist-
> upgrade" on as many Mac architectures as I can? I don't have any non-
> Mac PowerPC machines, so I can't try the oddball kernel versi
29 matches
Mail list logo
