Bug#472846: busybox: Regression in pidof: no longer lists 'debian-installer' processes

2008-03-27 Thread Frans Pop
On Thursday 27 March 2008, Frans Pop wrote: > So I guess this should be turned into an upstream wishlist bug to > implement support for -x as a substitute for the old behavior. After thinking about this a bit, could it be that the old behavior was a deliberate compromise between having a separate

Bug#472846: busybox: Regression in pidof: no longer lists 'debian-installer' processes

2008-03-27 Thread Bastian Blank
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 09:16:31AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > On Thursday 27 March 2008, Frans Pop wrote: > > So I guess this should be turned into an upstream wishlist bug to > > implement support for -x as a substitute for the old behavior. > > After thinking about this a bit, could it be that th

Bug#472846: busybox: Regression in pidof: no longer lists 'debian-installer' processes

2008-03-27 Thread Eddy Petrișor
On 27/03/2008, Eddy Petrișor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 27/03/2008, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 09:18:59PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > > > In Debian Installer we're seeing a regression in pidof. For certain > > > processes it no longer returns the PI

Bug#472846: busybox: Regression in pidof: no longer lists 'debian-installer' processes

2008-03-27 Thread Eddy Petrișor
On 27/03/2008, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 09:18:59PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > > In Debian Installer we're seeing a regression in pidof. For certain > > processes it no longer returns the PID. > > > > # ps ax | grep [d]ebian-installer > > 452 root

Removal from Uploaders fields for Debian Installer

2008-03-27 Thread Frans Pop
Hello Alastair, There are a number of Debian Installer components that have people listed as Uploader who have not actually contributed to that component, or to D-I in general, in the recent past and have decided that it would help to clean up this situation somewhat. The reasoning is that the

Removal from Uploaders fields for Debian Installer

2008-03-27 Thread Frans Pop
Hello Karsten, There are a number of Debian Installer components that have people listed as Uploader who have not actually contributed to that component, or to D-I in general, in the recent past and have decided that it would help to clean up this situation somewhat. The reasoning is that the

Removal from Uploaders fields for Debian Installer

2008-03-27 Thread Frans Pop
Hello Kenshi, There are a number of Debian Installer components that have people listed as Uploader who have not actually contributed to that component, or to D-I in general [1], in the recent past and have decided that it would help to clean up this situation somewhat. The reasoning is that t

Removal from Uploaders fields for Debian Installer

2008-03-27 Thread Frans Pop
Hello Cajus, There are a number of Debian Installer components that have people listed as Uploader who have not actually contributed to that component, or to D-I in general, in the recent past and have decided that it would help to clean up this situation somewhat. The reasoning is that the Up

Removal from Uploaders fields for Debian Installer

2008-03-27 Thread Frans Pop
Hello Tollef, There are a number of Debian Installer components that have people listed as Uploader who have not actually contributed to that component, or to D-I in general, in the recent past and have decided that it would help to clean up this situation somewhat. The reasoning is that the U

Removal from Uploaders fields for Debian Installer

2008-03-27 Thread Frans Pop
Hello Norbert, There are a number of Debian Installer components that have people listed as Uploader who have not actually contributed to that component, or to D-I in general, in the recent past and have decided that it would help to clean up this situation somewhat. The reasoning is that the

Removal from Uploaders fields for Debian Installer

2008-03-27 Thread Frans Pop
Hello Jurij, There are a number of Debian Installer components that have people listed as Uploader who have not actually contributed to that component, or to D-I in general, in the recent past and have decided that it would help to clean up this situation somewhat. The reasoning is that the Up

Removal from Uploaders fields for Debian Installer

2008-03-27 Thread Frans Pop
Hello Petter, There are a number of Debian Installer components that have people listed as Uploader who have not actually contributed to that component, or to D-I in general, in the recent past and have decided that it would help to clean up this situation somewhat. The reasoning is that the U

Removal from Uploaders fields for Debian Installer

2008-03-27 Thread Frans Pop
Hello Joshua, There are a number of Debian Installer components that have people listed as Uploader who have not actually contributed to that component, or to D-I in general, in the recent past and have decided that it would help to clean up this situation somewhat. The reasoning is that the U

Removal from Uploaders fields for Debian Installer

2008-03-27 Thread Frans Pop
Hello David, There are a number of Debian Installer components that have people listed as Uploader who have not actually contributed to that component, or to D-I in general, in the recent past and have decided that it would help to clean up this situation somewhat. The reasoning is that the Up

Bug#472846: busybox: Regression in pidof: no longer lists 'debian-installer' processes

2008-03-27 Thread Bastian Blank
tags 472846 patch thanks On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 10:14:54AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > Looks like a feature request. The attached patch does this. Bastian -- No one can guarantee the actions of another. -- Spock, "Day of the Dove", stardate unknown Index: libbb/procps.c

Re: busybox bug triage

2008-03-27 Thread Frans Pop
Hoi Thijs, On Wednesday 26 March 2008, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > Because I'm using busybox for a personal project (and to improve Debian > in general) I've taken the liberty to do some bug triage on busybox bugs, > and may do some more in the near future. Please let me know if there's an > issue wi

Removal from Uploaders fields for Debian Installer

2008-03-27 Thread Frans Pop
Hello Jeff, There are a number of Debian Installer components that have people listed as Uploader who have not actually contributed to that component, or to D-I in general, in the recent past and have decided that it would help to clean up this situation somewhat. The reasoning is that the Upl

Removal from Uploaders fields for Debian Installer

2008-03-27 Thread Frans Pop
Hello Randolph, There are a number of Debian Installer components that have people listed as Uploader who have not actually contributed to that component, or to D-I in general, in the recent past and have decided that it would help to clean up this situation somewhat. The reasoning is that the

Processed: Re: Bug#472846: busybox: Regression in pidof: no longer lists 'debian-installer' processes

2008-03-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 472846 patch Bug#472846: busybox: Regression in pidof: no longer lists 'debian-installer' processes Tags were: d-i Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system adminis

Removal from Uploaders fields for Debian Installer

2008-03-27 Thread Frans Pop
Hello Bdale, There are a number of Debian Installer components that have people listed as Uploader who have not actually contributed to that component, or to D-I in general, in the recent past and have decided that it would help to clean up this situation somewhat. The reasoning is that the Up

Re: e2fsprogs 1.40.8-2 MIGRATED to testing

2008-03-27 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 26 March 2008, Theodore Tso wrote: > * Once a new version goes to testing, I should ping you guys to make > sure you know to synchronize the udebs That's not really needed as we have to give an OK for any migration anyway. > * I should avoid uploading a new version to unstable

Removal from Uploaders fields for Debian Installer

2008-03-27 Thread Frans Pop
Hello Wartan, There are a number of Debian Installer components that have people listed as Uploader who have not actually contributed to that component, or to D-I in general, in the recent past and have decided that it would help to clean up this situation somewhat. The reasoning is that the U

Re: Proposal: move win32-loader in SVN repository

2008-03-27 Thread Otavio Salvador
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:19:35AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> >> few alternatives for directory names but noone commented on them; the >> >> move has been done without a widely agreement from the team and people >> >> that were involved discussing

Re: Removal from Uploaders fields for Debian Installer

2008-03-27 Thread jbailey
Fine with me - I am no longer involved with d-I or any porting efforts. Frans, thanks for taking care of this cleanup. Its good to have people caring for these components. Tks, jeff bailey On 3/27/08, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Jeff, > > There are a number of Debian Installer co

Re: Removal from Uploaders fields for Debian Installer

2008-03-27 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Frans Pop] > Hello Petter, > > There are a number of Debian Installer components that have people > listed as Uploader who have not actually contributed to that > component, or to D-I in general, in the recent past and have decided > that it would help to clean up this situation somewhat. Good t

Bug#472846: no TODO found ;-)

2008-03-27 Thread Geert Stappers
Op 27-03-2008 om 12:06 schreef Bastian Blank: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 10:14:54AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > > Looks like a feature request. > > The attached patch does this. > --- libbb/find_pid_by_name.c (revision 21493) > +++ libbb/find_pid_by_name.c (working copy) > +

Re: Proposal: move win32-loader in SVN repository

2008-03-27 Thread Joey Hess
Otavio Salvador wrote: > About the migration in SCM changes, it does matter. > > When we're migrating from SVN to another SCM we'll need to do partial > migrations for all previous places the source where and do a move add > another point where we'll need another migration. > > Example: > > r100

Re: Removal from Uploaders fields for Debian Installer

2008-03-27 Thread Cajus Pollmeier
Hi Frans, just remove me from the list of uploaders. I've no time to work on this stuff right now, anyway. Cheers, Cajus Am Donnerstag, 27. März 2008 11:22:26 schrieb Frans Pop: > Hello Cajus, > > There are a number of Debian Installer components that have people listed > as Uploader who have n

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: e2fsprogs 1.40.8-2 MIGRATED to testing]

2008-03-27 Thread Otavio Salvador
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:10:33AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> We synchronize the udeb binaries of testing with unstable. When the >> packages goes to testing the udeb doesn't go automaticaly and it need

Re: Removal from Uploaders fields for Debian Installer

2008-03-27 Thread Bdale Garbee
On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 11:25 +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > This mail is to check if you have any objection to being removed as uploader I have no objection. Go for it! Bdale -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Update

2008-03-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 472700 1:1.9.2-2 Bug#472700: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D Bug marked as found in version 1:1.9.2-2. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administ

Re: kernel 2.6.24 & speakup

2008-03-27 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, maximilian attems, le Wed 26 Mar 2008 14:58:57 +0100, a écrit : > On Tue, 25 Mar 2008, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > Ah, so since Lenny's d-i is supposed to use 2.6.24, speakup won't make > > it into it :/ > > as otavio said we gonna release with > 2.6.24 > for debian 2.6.24 stuff would ha

Processed: forcibly merging 303182 407696

2008-03-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > forcemerge 303182 407696 Bug#303182: Should propose immediate resizing as a "Guided partitioning recipe" when there is no free space on the hard disk Bug#407696: add a guided partiti

Bug#472997: provide all guided recepies using free space instead of full disk

2008-03-27 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Package: partman-auto Version: 75 Severity: wishlist Hi, thanks for the installer. I just used lenny Beta 1 and it worked well for me! One thing I would like to have had was all "Guided" recipies (crypt, lvm) in a variant that only uses the free space instead of the full disk. Kind regar

avtobiff presentation

2008-03-27 Thread avtobiff
Hi! I have become interested in the GSoC[1] project DebianNAS[2]. As proposed by fjp on #debian-boot I now give a short presentation of myself and some thoughts (not a full application yet) regarding the DebianNAS GSoC project. My name is Per Andersson and I currently am taking my MSc[3] in CS[4]

Directory of orthopedics surgeons and 34 more specialties

2008-03-27 Thread Moon G Hal
Here is the package deal we're running for this week Practicing Doctors in the USA 788,065 in total * 17,630 emails Many different medical specialties Over a dozen sortable fields Directory of American Pharma Companies 47,000 personal emails and names of decision makers Hospitals in Amer

Bug#472878: marked as done (scsi drives are shown in syslog but their partitions can not be mounted.)

2008-03-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 28 Mar 2008 00:47:06 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line busybox's mount command syntax is different then the one on an installed system has caused the Debian Bug report #472878, regarding scsi drives are shown in syslog but their partitions can not

[D-I Manual] Build log for en (27 Mar 2008)

2008-03-27 Thread Felipe Augusto van de Wiel
A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN. There were no errors during the build process. The new version of the manual has been uploaded successfully. A log of the build is available at: - http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/logs/en.log === It is possible to use R

Re: Removal from Uploaders fields for Debian Installer

2008-03-27 Thread Matt Kraai
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:22:37AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > There are a number of Debian Installer components that have people listed as > Uploader who have not actually contributed to that component, or to D-I in > general, in the recent past and have decided that it would help to clean up > t