Hi,
On Friday 28 September 2007 11:13, Steve Langasek wrote:
> If you mean that upon installing the package the user immediately got a
> debconf prompt informing him that there was an old version installed,
This.
> I
> agree that this is a silly bug, but it's not one I can reproduce with
> "tas
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 12:54:38PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> A build log is
> http://people.debian.org/~stappers/d-i/images/20070928-10:33/build_netboot.log
This log shows the wrong mklibs.
Bastian
--
Lots of people drink from the wrong bottle sometimes.
-- Edith
Op 28-09-2007 om 10:29 schreef Gilles Sadowski:
> Geert Stappers:
> > Gilles Sadowski:
> > > Now the question is: How to boot with the card plugged in?
> >
> > I have a idea that might brings us one step further:
> >
> > What I understood from previous postings, is that debian-installer
> > does
Sex, 2007-09-28 às 10:56 +0200, Holger Levsen escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> a friend of mine installed debian etch on his laptop and choose the database
> task and then was informed during the installation, that an old version of
> postgresql (7.x) was installed. (I don't have more details at hand.)
>
i
Package: clock-setup
Version: 0.90
Severity: important
clock-setup calls tzsetup and tzsetup queries
debian-installer/country. However, debian-installer/country is set by
localechoose which is run after clock-setup.
See http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2007/09/msg00751.html
--
Martin Michlma
Accepted:
flash-kernel-installer_1.4_arm.udeb
to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel-installer_1.4_arm.udeb
flash-kernel_1.4.dsc
to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel_1.4.dsc
flash-kernel_1.4.tar.gz
to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel_1.4.tar.gz
flash-kernel_1.4_arm.deb
to pool/m
flash-kernel_1.4_arm.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
flash-kernel_1.4.dsc
flash-kernel_1.4.tar.gz
flash-kernel_1.4_arm.deb
flash-kernel-installer_1.4_arm.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-09-03 19:42]:
> before showing the "Choose Language" menu I see the following messages
> on the screen:
>
> E: Unimplemented function
> E: Unimplemented function
> E: Unimplemented function
> E: Unimplemented function
I've tracked this down now. The p
* Jérémy Bobbio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-09-27 12:52]:
> * libdebian-installe/0.50etch1
>Add support for SGI O2 machines.
I heard there were some objections to this change for a stable update:
| 11:29 < Lunar^> 13:42 < zobel> waldi: i read that as: libd-i did not
| work for O2's before. now
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-28 15:05]:
> I have high hopes for the nslu2, maybe it will be able to work w/o
> lowmem level 2 now. Haven't been able to check yet.
I just booted nslu2 in lowmem level 2 and didn't see any big
difference to etch at all (maybe 400 KB). From what I underst
Hi!
Here are the minutes from the Debian Installer meeting held on IRC two
days ago. A copy of these minutes is available online [1], as well as
the full IRC log [2].
[1] http://people.debian.org/~lunar/d-i/irc-meeting-20070926/minutes
[2] http://people.debian.org/~lunar/d-i/irc-meeting-20070926
Op 28-09-2007 om 13:58 schreef Bastian Blank:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 12:54:38PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > A build log is
> > http://people.debian.org/~stappers/d-i/images/20070928-10:33/build_netboot.log
>
> This log shows the wrong mklibs.
And what is the right
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Jérémy Bobbio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-09-27 12:52]:
* libdebian-installe/0.50etch1
Add support for SGI O2 machines.
I heard there were some objections to this change for a stable update:
| 11:29 < Lunar^> 13:42 < zobel> waldi: i read that as: libd-i did not
| w
rary reducer to use. Can be mklibs.sh or mklibs.py.
-MKLIBS = mklibs
+MKLIBS = mklibs -vv
# Normally the sources.list for building d-i will be derived from your
# "normal" sources.list. However, you can specify a mirror here to
# override
A build log is
http://people.debian.org/~stappers/d-i/images/20070928-10:33/build_netboot.log
Cheers
Geert Stappers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-09-28 17:05]:
> Unimplemented function". I consider this a bug in debconf, especially
> given that it (apparently) completely breaks the debconf database.
I cannot back up this claim but I still believe something breaks.
Just look at my previous mails
Luis Matos wrote:
> please report a bug against the postgresql package because maybe it has
> wrong dependencies (postgresql-7.4 | postgresql-8.1) instead of
> (postgresql-8.1 | postgresql-7.4)
>
> or maybe against the tasksel package asking for -8.1 to be installed
> instead of 7.4
tasksel uses
Holger Levsen wrote:
> Are there any plans to avoid such embarassing things to happen with the lenny
> release? I'm thinking of automated testing, not manual test plans...
I've been doing automated testing of all the tasks for several years. I
don't always have time to read the logs though, and n
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 10:56:41AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> a friend of mine installed debian etch on his laptop and choose the database
> task and then was informed during the installation, that an old version of
> postgresql (7.x) was installed. (I don't have more details at hand.)
What
Hello.
>
> That question is read by me as
> Teach me the art of Linux kernel development.
Not really.
> > >> Now the question is: How to boot with the card plugged in?
>
> I have a idea that might brings us one step further:
>
> What I understood from previous postings, is that debian-inst
Hi,
a friend of mine installed debian etch on his laptop and choose the database
task and then was informed during the installation, that an old version of
postgresql (7.x) was installed. (I don't have more details at hand.)
IMO this makes us look really silly.
Are there any plans to avoid suc
Here's the syslog; I hope this helps.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
syslog.bz2
Description: Binary data
Package: cdebconf
Version: 0.123
When I use debconf-set to set a really long string, I get the message
"E: Unimplemented function". Apparently the string has to be longer
than ~1024 bytes and contain newlines:
/var/lib/cdebconf # ./t
E: Unimplemented function
E: Unimplemented function
Test pro
Package: main-menu
Version: 1.20
Severity: normal
The fix for #288053 seems not to have worked. To see the bug, build a
d-i i386 netboot image without localechooser on it. (Or see #44,
which also probably affects nslu2.)
d-i will download components including localechooser, and construct a
me
clock-setup_0.92_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
clock-setup_0.92.dsc
clock-setup_0.92.tar.gz
clock-setup_0.92_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
In #288053, Colin said:
> This bug was introduced due to the fix for #224633. Perhaps the existing
> fix for that is too crude. The basic goal there is that if a menu item
> fails but a later one has succeeded, main-menu shouldn't keep on setting
> the earlier failing one as the default. At the mom
(Don't CC me, i'm on the list)
Sex, 2007-09-28 às 13:46 -0400, Joey Hess escreveu:
> Luis Matos wrote:
> > please report a bug against the postgresql package because maybe it has
> > wrong dependencies (postgresql-7.4 | postgresql-8.1) instead of
> > (postgresql-8.1 | postgresql-7.4)
> >
> > or ma
Your message dated Fri, 28 Sep 2007 19:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#44: fixed in clock-setup 0.92
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Accepted:
clock-setup_0.92.dsc
to pool/main/c/clock-setup/clock-setup_0.92.dsc
clock-setup_0.92.tar.gz
to pool/main/c/clock-setup/clock-setup_0.92.tar.gz
clock-setup_0.92_i386.udeb
to pool/main/c/clock-setup/clock-setup_0.92_i386.udeb
Override entries for your package:
clock-setup_0.92.dsc
Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> This new busybox will remove "ifconfig" and add the often requested
> "ping". "ifconfig" is still currently in use by ppp-udeb, but Jérémy
> Bobbio proposed a yet-to-be-tested patch to solve this issue.
ppp-udeb is not the only d-i component to still use ifconfig, IIRC it's
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I wasn't aware that anything had changed to invalidate the often
> repeated arguments against including ping in d-i?
IIRC the only arguement was the size and it has been demonstrated that
it's almost none.
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
---
#277743 has been open for a while about the NEVERDEFAULT part of the
test.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
FYI: The status of the kernel-wedge source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 2.39
Current version: 2.40
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
--
anna configures non-menu-item udebs to fix #232397. It dependency orders
the package list, and then goes through it in order, skipping over
menu-items. This fails if there is a non-menu-item udeb that depends on a udeb
that
is a menu item. At the time when it was implemented, there weren't any, bu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8
> clone 62 -1
Bug#62: still fails to insert new menu items after the current item
Bug 62 cloned as bug 74.
> reassign -1 anna
Bug#74: still fails to insert new menu
This seems to work.
I left last_successful_item in, since it's still needed to allow
skipping past menu items, and I understand how the seen_items hash is
supposed to be used now.
Index: debian/changelog
===
--- debian/changelog(
hw-detect_1.55_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
hw-detect_1.55.dsc
hw-detect_1.55.tar.gz
ethdetect_1.55_all.udeb
disk-detect_1.55_all.udeb
hw-detect_1.55_i386.udeb
archdetect_1.55_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUB
Accepted:
archdetect_1.55_i386.udeb
to pool/main/h/hw-detect/archdetect_1.55_i386.udeb
disk-detect_1.55_all.udeb
to pool/main/h/hw-detect/disk-detect_1.55_all.udeb
ethdetect_1.55_all.udeb
to pool/main/h/hw-detect/ethdetect_1.55_all.udeb
hw-detect_1.55.dsc
to pool/main/h/hw-detect/hw-detect
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8
> package main-menu
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: main-menu
> tags 277743 + pending
Bug#277743: Should not select NEVERDEFAULT items
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tag
Package: console-setup
Version: 1.19
Severity: normal
Since the uprade of one of the X componentes (iirc it was the xserver),
I get the following warning messages when running console-setup:
WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 214
WARNING: Undefined kernel key code for 215
WARNING: Undefined k
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8
> package main-menu
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: main-menu
> tags 437323 + pending
Bug#437323: main-menu: Should print an error instead of segfaulting in case of
circular dependenci
Your message dated Fri, 28 Sep 2007 23:50:56 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Fri, 28 Sep 2007 23:53:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Hello, I hope I'm contacting the right folks!
I'm trying to find out the copyright status of the elilo-installer
package to see if it qualifies as free software or not. Below is a bit
of a description and I was advised by debian-legal to ask the package
maintainers. Hope someone can help!
Cheers,
Vis|t cheapezsoft. com |n Internet Exp|orer.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vis|t cheapezsoft. com |n Internet Exp|orer.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vis|t cheapezsoft. com |n Internet Exp|orer.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vis|t cheapezsoft. com |n Internet Exp|orer.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vis|t cheapezsoft. com |n Internet Exp|orer.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vis|t cheapezsoft. com |n Internet Exp|orer.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vis|t cheapezsoft. com |n Internet Exp|orer.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Holger Levsen wrote:
> > Are there any plans to avoid such embarassing things to happen with the
> > lenny
> > release? I'm thinking of automated testing, not manual test plans...
>
> I've been doing automated testing of all the tasks for several years. I
> * Results of the D-I team members poll: what to do with these results?
That one can be discussed in the list. I made a few proposals but the
only people who answered do not have, imho, a proeminent enough voice
in the D-I team for a decision to be taken.
The major points are:
- any objection
52 matches
Mail list logo
