Op 19-06-2007 om 02:25 schreef Faheem Mitha:
> On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Geert Stappers wrote:
> >Op 18-06-2007 om 16:17 schreef Faheem Mitha:
> >>
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >
> >
> > See the file /etc/udev/rules.d/z25_persistent-net.rules
>
> Sorry, I don't follow what you are trying to say.
do
cat /etc/u
Frans Pop wrote:
> Although there are still some issues, I think the current code is ready to
> be committed and used as an experimental feature.
agreed
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
I've just requested a meeting to be scheduled for tonight 21:30 - 22:30 in
the lower talk room.
The meeting is intended as a D-I developers team meeting, but others are
welcome to listen in. Note that an open D-I BoF is scheduled on Friday
22nd at 16:30.
The meeting may be streamed, but that i
Will there be another update of d-i for stable? I'm asking because
I'd like to put the patch below in to allow installations on SGI O2
machines with RM5200SC (Nevada) CPUs.
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-07 17:08]:
> Author: tbm
> Date: Thu Jun 7 17:08:16 2007
> New Revision: 4
Hello,
I have done some work on a project i would call "DebianOn". I am now
requesting for comments on it.
The idea is to have a place where Debian users can report how a given
hardware is supported by Debian (stable or testing), and to document how
to actually configure it.
Actually, the Debian
On Tuesday 19 June 2007 11:58, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Will there be another update of d-i for stable? I'm asking because
> I'd like to put the patch below in to allow installations on SGI O2
> machines with RM5200SC (Nevada) CPUs.
You've obviously and unfortunately just missed the current uplo
* Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-19 13:08]:
> You've obviously and unfortunately just missed the current upload.
Yeah, I know. :/
> There very likely will be another one at some point, but no idea
> when. Please commit the patch in the Etch branch with an
> appropriate changelog entry ma
Hello.
on 06/18/07 03:02, Christian Perrier wrote:
>> +Template: passwd/chkpasswdstrength
>> +Type: boolean
>> +Default: true
>> +_Description: : Reject weak passwords?
>
> Should be:
>
> _Description: Reject weak passwords?
>
>
>> + Please choose whether you want the entered passwords strengt
The attached patch makes netcfg use Choices-C for interface choices
rather than the current weird hack whereby you normally have to preseed
the full English description of the interface but netcfg will let you
get away with just preseeding the interface name.
Does anyone care if preseeding the ful
First I'd like to say, I had absolutely no issues installing RC2, in
fact the experience was much better than either Unslung or OpenSlug,
the auto-configuration for Web Server / Samba Share worked great.
Now, my issue is trying to get Debian/NSLU2 Stable 4.0r0 to work on a
different slug (still r
while building cd
make image gave following output at some point of time
Missing debootstrap-required I:
Missing debootstrap-required usage:
Missing debootstrap-required [OPTION]...
Missing debootstrap-required
Missing debootstrap-required
grep: Unmatched [ or [^
Missing debootstrap-required [
11 matches
Mail list logo
