Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 421364 + unreproducible
Bug#421364: installation-reports - s390
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
On Saturday 28 April 2007 22:31, Laszlo T. wrote:
> How can I install etch to fakeraid (I need a dual boot system) with
> netinst cd? The partition manager doesn't see my raid.
> I tried with modules=dmraid-udeb and dmraid -ay, but I don'n know what
> to do.
dmraid is currently not officially supp
On Monday 24 July 2006 03:03, Héctor A. Rompato Carricart wrote:
> Comments/Problems:
> Can't install the sata_via modules. I compile de 2.6.16 kernel with the
> correct ahci and sata_via patch but I can't known how to put in the
> installer. The SATA drive is not recognized.
> If you can explain m
Your message dated Mon, 14 May 2007 10:26:20 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419698: sunblade100 won't boot etch installer
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Package: partman-auto
Severity: normal
Version: not sure! It's the version I got by downloading:
ftp://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/dists/etch/main/installer-i386/20070308/images/netboot/netboot.tar.gz
I have two disks specified in partman-auto/disk, but only the first disk
gets partitioned. Subseque
Your message dated Mon, 14 May 2007 12:25:56 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Submitter's error
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
It´s OK, with the new installer works fine.
New mobos only works OK with the 2.6.28 kernels. The Nvidia MPC61 chipset
works fine with the 2.6.20 (SATA, network, video and sound)
2007/5/14, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Monday 24 July 2006 03:03, Héctor A. Rompato Carricart wrote:
> Comments
Your message dated Mon, 14 May 2007 15:01:41 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379519: installation-reports
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
> > The system appeared to hang because a getty process was not started for
> > the console.
>
>> Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 hv2pos hvsi0
> >
> > hv2pos login: rolfb
>
> > Password:
>
>
>
> As you did get a login prompt, it seems that /etc/inittab was set up
>
> correctly to use the serial console (an a
On Monday 14 May 2007 17:33, Rolf Brudeseth wrote:
> I got the login prompt after I modified /etc/inittab (via a linux
> install I had on another disk).
OK, your report did not really make that clear. It was probably not really
necessary to include the login prompt then. I understood that that is
> > I got the login prompt after I modified /etc/inittab (via a linux
> > install I had on another disk).
>
> OK, your report did not really make that clear. It was probably not
really
> necessary to include the login prompt then. I understood that that is
> what you saw when it appeared to be hang
Is it understood how one determines which device file (hvsi0, hvsi1 or
hvc0) Open Firmware associates with the console as it pertains to IBM
System p servers?
This can be determined by looking at properties under /proc/device-tree.
Please let me know if this is needed and I will find the documen
On Sunday 13 May 2007 23:43, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Comments on this packaging issue welcome.
>
> What if I put it inside parted package as parted-utils-udeb?
That makes no real difference in practice. I think I'd prefer to create
the udeb inside partma
On Monday 14 May 2007 19:28, Rolf Brudeseth wrote:
> Is it understood how one determines which device file (hvsi0, hvsi1 or
> hvc0) Open Firmware associates with the console as it pertains to IBM
> System p servers?
The question is if it is necessary to know that. For that I'd first like
to see t
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sunday 13 May 2007 23:43, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Comments on this packaging issue welcome.
>>
>> What if I put it inside parted package as parted-utils-udeb?
>
> That makes no real difference in practice. I th
On Monday 14 May 2007 20:00, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> And it not being use outside of Debian wasn't a big deal since I might
> add it inside of Debian package only.
Eh, sorry. I meant outside D-I, not Debian.
pgpJok1C2n9XS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Monday 14 May 2007 20:00, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> And it not being use outside of Debian wasn't a big deal since I might
>> add it inside of Debian package only.
>
> Eh, sorry. I meant outside D-I, not Debian.
Yes. I thought it would be better to put i
> So, the next step is to find out why the installer does not recognize
that
> you are on serial console.
> Can you please boot the installer again and activate a debug shell (there
> is an option in the installer's main menu, or alternatively you can use
> that network-console component).
>
> Ple
On Monday 14 May 2007 20:23, Rolf Brudeseth wrote:
> ~ # ls -l /usr/lib/finish-install.d/90console
> ls: /usr/lib/finish-install.d/90console: No such file or directory
Sorry, the file only appears after you have passed the step "load
additional installer components", so you will have to walk thro
~ # cat /usr/lib/finish-install.d/90console
#!/bin/sh
set -e
set -x
log() {
logger -t finish-install "$@"
}
# Since this script is running with debconf, 'tty' does
# not give reliable answers about what sort of terminal
# we have. The stdin of /sbin/debian-installer seems
# to tell the t
(No need to CC me. I see your replies on the debian-boot mailing list.)
On Monday 14 May 2007 21:09, Rolf Brudeseth wrote:
> ~ # /usr/lib/finish-install.d/90console
[...]
> + readlink /proc/1560/fd/0
> + rawconsole=/dev/console
Thanks. So the debian-installer process thinks a regular console is b
On Monday 14 May 2007 19:57, Softlab wrote:
> I reproduced the error. The mirror I used is ftp.de.debian.org.
> Please find attached the hercules config deb4.txt,
> the Hercules Logfile.053.txt,
> the hardware-summary.txt,
> the partman.txt and the syslog.txt.
Thank you for the additional info. I'
On Monday 14 May 2007 21:09, Rolf Brudeseth wrote:
> > ~ # /usr/lib/finish-install.d/90console
> [...]
> > + readlink /proc/1560/fd/0
> > + rawconsole=/dev/console
> Thanks. So the debian-installer process thinks a regular console is being
> used. That means that we do indeed need that redirectio
On Monday 14 May 2007 22:29, Rolf Brudeseth wrote:
> - Step 1:
> $ cat /proc/device-tree/options/output-device
> /vdevice/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ==> hvsi0 or hvc0
>
> $ cat /proc/device-tree/options/output-device
> /vdevice/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ==> hvsi1
Do these pseudo files always exist, or just if
> On Monday 14 May 2007 22:29, Rolf Brudeseth wrote:
> > - Step 1:
> > $ cat /proc/device-tree/options/output-device
> > /vdevice/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > ==> hvsi0 or hvc0
> >
> > $ cat /proc/device-tree/options/output-device
> > /vdevice/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > ==> hvsi1
> Do these pseudo files alwa
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
Date: 5/14/07 - 6:00 PM CST
Machine: Toshiba Satellite P200-ST2071
Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU T7200 @ 2.00GHz
Memory: 2
On Monday 14 May 2007 23:55, Rolf Brudeseth wrote:
> > On Monday 14 May 2007 22:29, Rolf Brudeseth wrote:
> > > - Step 1:
> > > $ cat /proc/device-tree/options/output-device
> > > /vdevice/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > ==> hvsi0 or hvc0
> > >
> > > $ cat /proc/device-tree/options/output-device
> > > /vde
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 423940 uswsusp
Bug#423940: Package: installation-reports
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `uswsusp'.
> retitle 423940 Could not detect the swap partition after a fresh install with
> D-I
Bug#423940: Package: installation-
reassign 423940 uswsusp
retitle 423940 Could not detect the swap partition after a fresh install with
D-I
thanks
> 1. Did not detect wireless network card. Intel Wireless WiFi Link
> 4965AGN (802.11a/g/n) (Maybe too new for Linux support yet? Will know
> more once I try to make it work...)
Y
29 matches
Mail list logo
