Package: installation-reports
Boot method: BootX
Image version: Debian etch powerpc weekly build
Date: February 4th 2007
Machine: Power Macintosh G3 Server
Architecture: powerpc
Processor: PowerPC 740/750 (G3)
Memory: 256 MB
Partitions:
Result of df -Tl:
FilesystemType 1K-blocks Used
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 04:41:19PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 01:15:23PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > On Mar 06, "Robert Millan [ackstorm]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I urge you to reconsider severity of this problem. There's another
> > > situation
> > > tha
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 09:44:31AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
>
> > On Mar 06, "Robert Millan [ackstorm]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I urge you to reconsider severity of this problem. There's another
> >> situation
> >> that makes it much wo
On Wednesday 07 March 2007 00:58, David Härdeman wrote:
> On FJP's request I've put up a wiki page describing the problem with
> combined crypto and RAID setups in the current installer and how it can
> be worked around.
Here's the url for the page:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/RAIDvsCry
On Mar 07, "Robert Millan [ackstorm]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Labels are not well tested and a source of problems indeed.
The /dev/disk/by-*/ devices are well tested and I do not know about
problems posed by them.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
> -Original Message-
> From: Marco d'Itri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 07 March 2007 11:05
> To: Robert Millan [ackstorm]
> Cc: Mike Hommey; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; debian-release@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Bug#389881: RC-ness of this bug
>
>
> On Mar 07, "Robert Millan [ackstorm]" <[E
On Mar 07, peter green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> by-uuid contains my two ext3 partitions but not my swap partition, it also
> seems like it may be vulnerable to becoming confused.
Only if the admin is a moron and keeps around multiple file systems
cloned with dd.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 12:05:09PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Mar 07, "Robert Millan [ackstorm]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Labels are not well tested and a source of problems indeed.
> The /dev/disk/by-*/ devices are well tested and I do not know about
> problems posed by them.
I thou
"Robert Millan [ackstorm]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 09:44:31AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
>>
>> > On Mar 06, "Robert Millan [ackstorm]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I urge you to reconsider severity of this probl
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 01:26:47PM +0100, Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 12:05:09PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > On Mar 07, "Robert Millan [ackstorm]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Labels are not well tested and a source of problems indeed.
> > The /dev/disk/by-
"Robert Millan [ackstorm]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:33:47AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> "Robert Millan [ackstorm]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 09:44:31AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) write
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:33:47AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> "Robert Millan [ackstorm]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 09:44:31AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> >>
> >> > On Mar 06, "Robert Millan [ackstorm]" <[EMAIL
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: Netinstall CD-image
Image version: etch RC1
Date: 28 january 2007
Machine:
Processor: p4 ( but installed with i386 )
Memory:
Partitions: system, home, swap
Output of lspci -nn and lspci -vnn:
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (p
> > by-uuid contains my two ext3 partitions but not my swap
> partition, it also seems like it may be vulnerable to becoming confused.
>
> Only if the admin is a moron and keeps around multiple file systems
> cloned with dd.
are you calling it moronic to make a backup of a partition by dding to t
"Robert Millan [ackstorm]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:55:45AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> >
>> > With USB, you can't just boot a rescue system and repair a broken install
>> > from there, because /dev/sda will still be your USB drive.
>> >
>> > Of course, there a
Your message dated Wed, 07 Mar 2007 14:16:38 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#413836: installation-reports
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:55:45AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >
> > With USB, you can't just boot a rescue system and repair a broken install
> > from there, because /dev/sda will still be your USB drive.
> >
> > Of course, there are lots of hacks you can do to workaround that, but if
> > we g
> I don't know how invasive those changes might be. AFAIK Ubuntu already
> does it (Colin?) and wouldn't be too hard to pick the changes from
> them but we would also need RM and Frans approval :(
ubuntu already does what? there are four possible soloutions proposed aren't
there (labels in fstab
"peter green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I don't know how invasive those changes might be. AFAIK Ubuntu already
>> does it (Colin?) and wouldn't be too hard to pick the changes from
>> them but we would also need RM and Frans approval :(
> ubuntu already does what? there are four possible sol
On Wednesday 07 March 2007 03:47, Mike Hore wrote:
> Comments/Problems: The Ethernet connection is not detected. This
> machine has an 10/100BASE-T Ethernet port. I suspect the correct
> driver hasn't been included in the netinstall image.
After network detection failed, please switch to VT2 (o
On Wed, March 7, 2007 13:55, Otavio Salvador said:
> I don't know how invasive those changes might be. AFAIK Ubuntu already
> does it (Colin?) and wouldn't be too hard to pick the changes from
> them but we would also need RM and Frans approval :(
initramfs-tools already supports using /dev/disk/b
Hi Alex!
Welcome to an elite minority of those of us who have got this to work!
Below are a couple of hints from my own experience in doing this.
Rick
On Mar 7, 2007, at 5:21 AM, Alex Teclo wrote:
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: BootX
Image version: Debian etch powerpc weekly bui
Package: hw-detect
Severity: serious
debian/rules build
AUTOMAKE=automake-1.8 ACLOCAL=aclocal-1.8 \
autoreconf -i -v
Can't exec "aclocal-1.8": El fitxer o directori no existeix at
/usr/bin/autoreconf line 182.
Use of uninitialized value in pattern match (m//) at /usr/bin/autoreco
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD, netboot
Image version: sarge, etch, and daily netboot and CD images
Date: March 5-7, 2007
Machine: Sunfire v880
Processor: 4x ultrasparc
Memory: 8 GB
Partitions: nothing yet.
Output of lspci -nn and lspci -vnn:
Can't get the box to boot.
Base Sys
Package: grub-installer
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Any reason why we shouldn't check for amd64 here ? (other than 64-bit Macs
not yet being in the market)
Index: debian/isinstallable
===
--- debian/isinstallable(revision 4
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 413851 normal
Bug#413851: missing build-depends on automake1.8
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debi
severity 413851 normal
thanks
# sorry, didn't notice this target is svn-only
Anyway, you need libtool too:
configure.ac:6: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_PROG_LIBTOOL
If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow.
See the Autoconf documentation.
autoreconf:
Your message dated Wed, 07 Mar 2007 16:53:30 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#413851: missing build-depends on automake1.8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Package: libdebian-installer4
Version: 0.49
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
With this patch, amd64 can be detected as a subarch of i386. e.g.
$ ./archdetect
i386/amd64
This can be useful to conditionalise install of stuff like libc6-amd64,
and possibly other things.
-- System Information:
D
Hi,
On Wednesday 07 March 2007 14:46, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 March 2007 03:47, Mike Hore wrote:
> > Comments/Problems: The Ethernet connection is not detected. This
> > machine has an 10/100BASE-T Ethernet port. I suspect the correct
> > driver hasn't been included in the netinstall
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 03:57:08PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>
> I have no idea where you are getting this from. hw-detect does not use
> automake.
Uhm sorry, I mean to file this on libdebian-installer (I was jumping from
one place to another, in pursuit of #413858).
> Note: don'
On Wednesday 07 March 2007 17:09, Robert Millan wrote:
> Ok then. You still could add Build-Depends-Indep though.
I've added a HACKING file with the needed info instead.
pgpEvYaWyVyBF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 10:50:46AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> "peter green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> I don't know how invasive those changes might be. AFAIK Ubuntu already
> >> does it (Colin?) and wouldn't be too hard to pick the changes from
> >> them but we would also need RM and
Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote:
> I urge you to reconsider severity of this problem. There's another situation
> that makes it much worse:
>
> - User boots off USB stick
> - sda is USB, sdb is SCSI or SATA
> - GRUB install on (hd0) (i.e. sda) fails.
> - Manual repairing is not possible, b
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 12:28:09PM -0500, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote:
> > I urge you to reconsider severity of this problem. There's another
> > situation
> > that makes it much worse:
> >
> > - User boots off USB stick
> > - sda is USB, sdb is SCSI
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> reassign 413875 installation-reports
Bug#413875: 1 - Install the Debian with DVD 4.0
2 - Select a mirror
3 - The bug born in the middle of the Installing
Bug reassigned from packa
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 06:11:27PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 02 March 2007 03:11, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > What is the intended difference in semantics between RESIZE_PARTITION
> > and VIRTUAL_RESIZE_PARTITION? In the resize_partition() function these
> > are distinguished by the open_fi
partman-base_105_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-base_105.dsc
partman-base_105.tar.gz
partman-base_105_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
partman-lvm_52_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-lvm_52.dsc
partman-lvm_52.tar.gz
partman-lvm_52_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
partman-md_33_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-md_33.dsc
partman-md_33.tar.gz
partman-md_33_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [
partman-partitioning_47_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-partitioning_47.dsc
partman-partitioning_47.tar.gz
partman-partitioning_47_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
Accepted:
partman-lvm_52.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_52.dsc
partman-lvm_52.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_52.tar.gz
partman-lvm_52_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_52_all.udeb
Override entries for your package:
partman-lvm_52.dsc - source debian
Accepted:
partman-base_105.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-base/partman-base_105.dsc
partman-base_105.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-base/partman-base_105.tar.gz
partman-base_105_amd64.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-base/partman-base_105_amd64.udeb
Override entries for your package:
partman-base_10
Accepted:
partman-md_33.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-md/partman-md_33.dsc
partman-md_33.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-md/partman-md_33.tar.gz
partman-md_33_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-md/partman-md_33_all.udeb
Override entries for your package:
partman-md_33.dsc - source debian-installer
Accepted:
partman-partitioning_47.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_47.dsc
partman-partitioning_47.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_47.tar.gz
partman-partitioning_47_amd64.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_
Your message dated Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:02:14 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#397973: fixed in partman-md 33
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:02:13 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#380226: fixed in partman-base 105
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:02:13 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#413183: fixed in partman-lvm 52
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:02:15 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379835: fixed in partman-partitioning 47
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:02:13 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#412769: fixed in partman-base 105
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version: debian-31r5-i386-netinst.iso, from usc.edu mirror, md5sum good
Date: 7 Mar 2007, 22:00 UTC
Machine: Old Gateway, Tabor{2,3} motherboard
Processor: P3 (Katmai) 596MHz
Memory: 384 MB ECC
Partitions: none
Output of lspci and lspci -n:
On Wednesday 07 March 2007 23:58, Lou Poppler wrote:
> Comments/Problems:
> : The unavailable modules, and the devices that need them are: agpgart
> : (Intel Corporation 440BX/ZX/DX - 82443BX/ZX/DX Host bridge), ide-scsi
> : (Linux IDE-SCSI emulation layer), ide-mod (Linux IDE driver),
> : ide-prob
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 03:18:19PM +0100, David Härdeman wrote:
On Wed, March 7, 2007 13:55, Otavio Salvador said:
I don't know how invasive those changes might be. AFAIK Ubuntu already
does it (Colin?) and wouldn't be too hard to pick the changes from
them but we would also need RM and Frans ap
Hi,
Can you override the default lvm volume name used by d-i using a preseed
file (priority=critical)?
By default it seems to use the hostname which isn't what I want and would
like to override it to vg00 for instance.
I found this entry somewhere by googling but it doesn't seem to have the
des
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 12:44:05AM +0100, David Härdeman wrote:
> >initramfs-tools already supports using /dev/disk/by-* entries in fstab. As
> >for the installer, I'm not sure that looking at Ubuntu will help since
> >they use something different than d-i for the regular installs (and I
> >don't k
> I don't believe this should be changed for etch at this point in
> the release
> process, and that's speaking as someone who's run into this problem myself
> with SCSI device renumbering -- it's awkward and annoying to have to
> manually fiddle your boot config because a USB device is no longer
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 07 March 2007 23:58, Lou Poppler wrote:
> The text of the error screen, and the text of the Installation Guide,
> seem to be saying clearly that these modules are needed to drive the
> IDE hardware, and this was the last chance to automatically
Hi Frans,
On Wednesday 07 March 2007 03:47, Mike Hore wrote:
Comments/Problems: The Ethernet connection is not detected. This
machine has an 10/100BASE-T Ethernet port. I suspect the correct
driver hasn't been included in the netinstall image.
After network detection failed, please switch to
On Thursday 08 March 2007 00:53, Andrew Leach wrote:
> # Volume group name:
> d-i lvmcfg/vgcreate_namestring
Try:
partman-lvm/vgcreate_name
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Thu, 08 Mar 2007 02:16:37 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#413931: d-i missing ide modules
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 04:09:48PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 12:44:05AM +0100, David Härdeman wrote:
I've attached a patch which implements persistent device names in
partman by checking for devices which are mounted under /target and
which have a suitable link in /de
61 matches
Mail list logo
