Package: partman-basicfilesystems*
Version: 49
When I just now tested d-i rc1 on a new laptop, where I had to turn
off the machine to stop the windows installer (Alt-Ctrl-Del didn't
work), I ran into a problem with the NTFS resizer.
I wanted to shrink the NTFS file system, and selected this opti
package: cdebconf-gtk-udeb
severity: minor
the cancel button, displayed while the progressbar runs if the debconf
client has set the procresscancel capability, canot be accessed using
the TAB button.
Try tabbing to cancel button while the dhcp client tries to
autoconfigure the network (tested
Hello,
== Introduction ==
6 Month ago i already had contacted the tech comitte in hope that the current
mess between frans and a few other members of the d-i team and me can be
solved. The tech comitte refused a ruling on this issue.
We are many months later, and the issue is not even near to be
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 400034 partman-crypto
Bug#400034: partman-auto-crypto: please allow waiving erase operation during
guided partitioning
Bug reassigned from package `partman-auto-crypto' to `partman-crypto'.
> forcemerge 400034 381898
Bug#400034: partman-auto-
oldsys-preseed_1.0_arm.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
oldsys-preseed_1.0.dsc
oldsys-preseed_1.0.tar.gz
oldsys-preseed_1.0_arm.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
partman-auto_61_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-auto_61.dsc
partman-auto_61.tar.gz
partman-auto_61_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
Refinements of previously known structures may be published if
sufficient new information is presented.
Here, a novel algorithm that has been developed and tested with the
images of users' crystals saved in an annotated database is described.
Reports on new protein structures are particularly enco
Accepted:
oldsys-preseed_1.0.dsc
to pool/main/o/oldsys-preseed/oldsys-preseed_1.0.dsc
oldsys-preseed_1.0.tar.gz
to pool/main/o/oldsys-preseed/oldsys-preseed_1.0.tar.gz
oldsys-preseed_1.0_arm.udeb
to pool/main/o/oldsys-preseed/oldsys-preseed_1.0_arm.udeb
Override entries for your package:
o
Accepted:
partman-auto_61.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_61.dsc
partman-auto_61.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_61.tar.gz
partman-auto_61_i386.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_61_i386.udeb
Override entries for your package:
partman-auto_61.dsc - s
Your message dated Fri, 24 Nov 2006 12:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#399951: fixed in partman-auto 61
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 09:37:04PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > So, if you want to solve this, don't propose to commit my patch, but speak
>> > to
>> > frans, and beat some decency and maturity into him
Package: debian-installer
Severity: wishlist
When installing from network doesn't work, I would like to be able to
ping a few hosts to help isolate the problem. However, there seems to be
no 'ping' command available from the shell.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> patch with same error and blame me? Sorry Sven but you're using every
>> oportunity to blame everyone.
>
> No, i don't blame you. you seem eager for me to fix the problem, but are
> ignoring that i am not able to work on it until this WE.
You're suppose
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 10:49:40AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 09:37:04PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> > So, if you want to solve this, don't propose to commit my patc
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 10:53:02AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> patch with same error and blame me? Sorry Sven but you're using every
> >> oportunity to blame everyone.
> >
> > No, i don't blame you. you seem eager for me to fix the problem, but ar
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: floppy
Image version: d-i testing i386
Date: Nov. 11, 2006
Machine: Fujitsu fmv-5133nu5/w
Processor: Pentium 133MHz
Memory: 32 MB
Partitions:
Disk /dev/hda: 40.0 GB, 40060403712 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 4870 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065
Hi
i recently put my hands on an AMD64 machine, so i had the chance to run
the installer from a chroot and i noticed that the crash produces this log
libgcc_s.so.1 must be installed for pthread_cancel to work
(!) [ 5905:0.000] --> Caught signal 6 (unknown origin) <--
libgcc_s.so.1 must be
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 10:53:02AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> >> patch with same error and blame me? Sorry Sven but you're using every
>> >> oportunity to blame everyone.
>> >
>> > No, i don't blame you.
Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Hi
i recently put my hands on an AMD64 machine, so i had the chance to run
the installer from a chroot and i noticed that the crash produces this log
libgcc_s.so.1 must be installed for pthread_cancel to work
(!) [ 5905:0.000] --> Caught signal 6 (unknown origin)
Denis Oliver Kropp wrote:
Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Hi
i recently put my hands on an AMD64 machine, so i had the chance to
run the installer from a chroot and i noticed that the crash produces
this log
libgcc_s.so.1 must be installed for pthread_cancel to work
(!) [ 5905:0.000] --> Cau
Your message dated Fri, 24 Nov 2006 17:00:37 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#400199: etch network install: 'ping' command missing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6_1.11_ia64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6_1.11.dsc
linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6_1.11.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.18-3-itanium-di_1.11_ia64.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.18-3-itanium-di_1.11_ia64.udeb
nic-shared-modules-2.6.
Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 23 November 2006 23:34, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Hiding them, as it's done now, has no effect, and this should be fixed
because it's wrong.
The attached patch also takes care of hiding ok, back and screenshot
buttons while the progressbar is running and CAPB progre
(new) acpi-modules-2.6.18-3-itanium-di_1.11_ia64.udeb extra debian-installer
ACPI support modules
This package contains linux kernel modules for ACPI.
(new) cdrom-core-modules-2.6.18-3-itanium-di_1.11_ia64.udeb standard
debian-installer
CDROM support
This package contains core CDROM support for
Now that we've switched to GTKDFB 2.8.x i could not reproduce this bug
(which was detected using GTKDFB 2.0.9) anymore, nor with the sdl driver
nor with fbdev.
May i proceed closing it?
cheers
Attilio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.38_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.38.dsc
linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.38.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.18-3-486-di_1.38_i386.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.18-3-486-di_1.38_i386.udeb
nic-extra-modules-2.6.18-3-486-
Package: tasksel
Version: 2.56
Severity: normal
Tasksel's print-server task includes gimp-print, "the Print plugin for the
GIMP", which depends on gimp. This isn't necessary on a print server.
(new) acpi-modules-2.6.18-3-486-di_1.38_i386.udeb extra debian-installer
ACPI support modules
This package contains linux kernel modules for ACPI.
(new) cdrom-core-modules-2.6.18-3-486-di_1.38_i386.udeb standard
debian-installer
CDROM support
This package contains core CDROM support for the Linu
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 07:56:28PM +0100, Agustin Martin wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 06:37:01PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Can you provide us with a version of the relevant package(s) (probably
> > only dictionaries-common) that dump some debugging output somewhere
> > (stderr will work)?
>
loaded an image from 20061123
today, and on the boot prompt I read this date, but when the cd is
scanned during the installation process, d-i says that a valid
etch snapshot from 20061124 was found. ???
^
Holger
--
=
On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 12:47:31 +0100 Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 23 November 2006 00:45, Holger Wansing wrote:
> > So everything is commented out!
>
> And that is the cause of the problem.
> I suspect that the cause is just a minor error recognizing the CD, which
> happens quite often with older
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: netinst CD
Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/
daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
from 20061123
Date: 20061124
Machine: several different machines, same problem
Base System Installation Checklist
Holger Wansing wrote:
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: netinst CD
Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/
daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
from 20061123
Date: 20061124
Machine: several different machines, same problem
Base System
Christian Perrier wrote
> I wrote
>> How do you manage to install both at the same time?
>
> triggerred by tasksel as it seems
strange,
$ dpkg-source -x tasksel_2.58.dsc && grep -R ifrench tasksel-2.58/*
dpkg-source: extracting tasksel in tasksel-2.58
dpkg-source: unpacking tasksel_2.58.tar.gz
t
reassign 400258 udev-udeb
thanks
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 08:07:55PM +0100, Holger Wansing wrote:
> With the netinst CD (not tested with business card)
> the cdrom drive is not automatically detected as it was
> in the past.
> Complains about "no common cdrom drive was found"
> and prompts me to lo
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: netinst CD
Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/
daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
from 20061123
Date: 20061124
Machine: Machine: Toshiba Laptop Satellite S320cds
Partitions: hda13,9 GB ext2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 400258 udev-udeb
Bug#400258: installation report: cdrom drive no more automatically found
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `udev-udeb'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
debian-installer-utils_1.41_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debian-installer-utils_1.41.dsc
debian-installer-utils_1.41.tar.gz
di-utils-shell_1.41_all.udeb
di-utils-reboot_1.41_all.udeb
di-utils-exit-installer_1.41_all.udeb
di-utils-terminfo_1.41
rootskel_1.45_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rootskel_1.45.dsc
rootskel_1.45.tar.gz
rootskel_1.45_i386.udeb
rootskel-bootfloppy_1.45_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
> But what's the current driver being use?
It seems to be nv. My monitor had not been recognized.
Philips 107B (Version 107B 10/00C)
Br,
Michael
Section "Device"
Identifier "nVidia Corporation NV44 [GeForce 6200 LE]"
Driver "nv"
BusID "PCI:2:0:0
Accepted:
debian-installer-utils_1.41.dsc
to pool/main/d/debian-installer-utils/debian-installer-utils_1.41.dsc
debian-installer-utils_1.41.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/debian-installer-utils/debian-installer-utils_1.41.tar.gz
di-utils-exit-installer_1.41_all.udeb
to pool/main/d/debian-installer-ut
Accepted:
rootskel-bootfloppy_1.45_i386.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel-bootfloppy_1.45_i386.udeb
rootskel_1.45.dsc
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_1.45.dsc
rootskel_1.45.tar.gz
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_1.45.tar.gz
rootskel_1.45_i386.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_1.4
A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN.
There were no errors during the build process.
The new version of the manual has been uploaded successfully.
A log of the build is available at:
- http://people.debian.org/~fjp/d-i_manual/log/en.log
===
It is possible to u
> >
> > My motherboard has a build-in network card. during install, the debian
> > installer provided me the following options:
> > eth0: Ethernet or Fast Ethernet
> > eth1: nVidia Corporation MCP51 Ethernet Controller
> >
> > I had selected 'eth1'.
>
> the "eth0" is the fire-wire card, it
Your message dated Fri, 24 Nov 2006 20:32:13 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#394971: fixed in rootskel 1.45
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
You receive points for what you put in, as long as you're sending one
out for every two in you'll be fine. No developer account needed.
Perhaps you've tried MS Word markup, or some other proprietary layout,
and perhaps you haven't. No developer account needed.
###
EXPLOSION!
Date: Monday, Novem
Op 24-11-2006 om 21:59 schreef Michael Josenhans:
>
> Suddenly after restarting the PC, the internet access is no longer working.
> In the networking settings, the ethernet connection 'eth1' had been
> disabled. After manual reactivation via the network settings, everything
> works fine again. Is
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 11:55:24AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 10:53:02AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> >> patch with same error and blame me? Sorry Sven but you're usi
48 matches
Mail list logo
