Bug#393116: problem with network card

Package: debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso   Boot method: CD Image version: 14-10-2006 from www.debian.orgDate: 14-10-2006 Machine: Clone Pc: MB Asus P5LD2-SE Processor: Intel Dual Core 3,4 GHZ Memory: 1Gb Partitions: I have not been able them to create, i have 2 partition of NTFS and 50Gb of free

Processed: Re: Bug#393116: problem with network card

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 393116 installation-reports Bug#393116: problem with network card Warning: Unknown package 'debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso' Bug reassigned from package `debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso' to `installation-reports'. > -- Stopping processing her

Re: Erratic, unusable mouse behaviour in g-i

On Saturday 14 October 2006 20:29, Joel Johnson wrote: > Indeed, using the most recent daily built installer works just fine > with the mouse (Logitech MX1000). Bug#384543 can in all likelihood also > be closed. That is great; thanks for confirming. I've also requested the submitter of #384543 to

Bug#152152: FWD: roger philhower Please do not come to work today

Good Morning roger philhower, Learn how to make 1.5 - 3.5k daily from your home. 888.701.3877 Contact me at my number if you can return calls. Thanks, Darren Hilton -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#393179: [l10n]: bad french translation in two screen titles

Package: installation-reports Version: 2.20 Severity: minor Tags: l10n Hi, I installed Etch beta3 in french with the "install" method (not installgui). I found two bad french translations: * "Choose language" screen: - the title is not translated in french. * "Select a keyboard layout" screen

Bug#393179: [l10n]: bad french translation in two screen titles

> I installed Etch beta3 in french with the "install" method (not > installgui). > > I found two bad french translations: > > * "Choose language" screen: > - the title is not translated in french. That is somewhat impossible to achieve. By debconf construction, dialog window titles are set at t

RFC: Possible (partial) solution for device persistence issue

I have written a very simple (or at least small) script intended to be run during finish-install that converts devices listed in /target/etc/fstab from regular device names to uuids (as far as possible). Although this is not a perfect solution, I feel it is an acceptable solution for Etch. By d

Re: Verification of installation-guide-i386 docs regarding alternative installation method

Op 14-10-2006 om 17:56 schreef Wiktor Wandachowicz: > Dear maintainers, > > Recently I've been playing with alternative Ubuntu installation method > without official installation media (https://launchpad.net/bugs/64765). > During my experiments I've found that several steps in the installation > g

Re: Verification of installation-guide-i386 docs regarding alternative installation method

Op 15-10-2006 om 19:55 schreef Geert Stappers: > Op 14-10-2006 om 17:56 schreef Wiktor Wandachowicz: > > Dear maintainers, > > [ ubuntu reviewed ] > > > > However, I thought about trying to repeat a similar procedure with Debian > > Etch to make sure that everone could benefit from my efforts (n

Re: RFC: Possible (partial) solution for device persistence issue

Op 15-10-2006 om 19:06 schreef Frans Pop: > I have written a very simple (or at least small) script intended to be run > during finish-install that converts devices listed in /target/etc/fstab > from regular device names to uuids (as far as possible). > > Although this is not a perfect solution,

Re: Recommend to tag #380226 "etch-ignore"; #379835 downgraded to important

On Thursday 12 October 2006 07:59, Frans Pop wrote: > I have today uploaded a version of partman-partitioning that includes a > check for NTFS 3.1 partitions and refuses to resize in that case; > earlier NTFS partitions (NT, XP, 2000) should still be resizable. > As partman is now "safe" I am downg

Re: RFC: Possible (partial) solution for device persistence issue

15 жовтня 2006 о 23:45 +0200 Geert Stappers написав(-ла): > Infact I don't understand why device naming does differ. AFAIK are the > d-i kernel and the installed kernel from the same build. That d-i uses > different tools (busybox, libc?) then installed kernel, will have it > good reason. But it is

Re: RFC: Possible (partial) solution for device persistence issue

On Sunday 15 October 2006 23:45, Geert Stappers wrote: > The thing I would like to see is that the _difference_ in device naming > between d-i kernel plus fellows and installed kernel plus fellows is > solved. See the discussions that we have had about this in the past. The culprit is the kernel/u

kernel-wedge 2.28 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the kernel-wedge source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 2.26 Current version: 2.28 -- This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible. See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information. --

tasksel 2.56 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the tasksel source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 2.54 Current version: 2.56 -- This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible. See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information. -- To U

Bug#381244: Bug 381244: suggested patch

I've attached a patch which should implement the proposed solution. -- David Härdeman Index: debian/partman-auto-lvm.templates === --- debian/partman-auto-lvm.templates (revision 41740) +++ debian/partman-auto-lvm.templates (work

Bug#392897: ntfsresize error is ignored, confusing the user

severity 392897 minor retitle 392897 Error handling for resize operations needs improvement thanks On Saturday 14 October 2006 06:00, Carl Fink wrote: > I suspect you don't have a routine to trap that particular error > message, so it just gets ignored. It should instead be passed along to > the

Processing of partman-partitioning_43_i386.changes

partman-partitioning_43_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partman-partitioning_43.dsc partman-partitioning_43.tar.gz partman-partitioning_43_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subj

Processed: Re: Bug#392897: ntfsresize error is ignored, confusing the user

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 392897 minor Bug#392897: ntfsresize error is ignored, confusing the user Severity set to `minor' from `important' > retitle 392897 Error handling for resize operations needs improvement Bug#392897: ntfsresize error is ignored, confusing the us

partman-partitioning_43_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: partman-partitioning_43.dsc to pool/main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_43.dsc partman-partitioning_43.tar.gz to pool/main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_43.tar.gz partman-partitioning_43_i386.udeb to pool/main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_4

Re: powermac fan control modules detection ...

Ccing debian-kernel for maks, and debian-boot for Frans, or whoever will commit my patches. On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 08:59:43AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Sun, 2006-10-15 at 12:16 +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > Hi, ... > > > > I am working at integrating fan control into d-i and init

Processed: merge 392897 375546

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forcemerge 392897 375546 Bug#392897: Error handling for resize operations needs improvement Bug#375546: partman-partitioning: failure to resize partitions should provide more informative error messages Forcibly Merged 375546 392897. > End of message,

Hola

Hola, no se si me recuerdas ... espero noticias tuyas saludos, bye -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]