Package: install
Version: etch beta 3
Hi,
I've no idea where to file this, so please reassign wherever necessary.
The console keymap installed when one installs from a etch beta netinst
CD has two broken keybindings, fixed by the attached patch.
Oddly enough, when I ran kbd-config after install
Your message dated Mon, 18 Sep 2006 10:36:16 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388035: boottime.kmap for Croatian has broken altgr+. and
altgr+,
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 10:36:16AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Oddly enough, when I ran kbd-config after install and explicitly
> > selected qwertz/Croat, it fixed this problem. No idea how, since the
> > console-data file also has it broken (I just filed a separate bug
> > report about that, too.)
Hi, i'm Nicolas Valcarcel (a.k.a. nxvl) From Lima Perú. I want to help
in the development of the Debian installer, i have just begin to read
the documentation in the wiki, i hope i can start asap helping you in
the development.
--
aka nxvl
key fingerprint: E140 4CC7 5E3C B6B4 DCA7 F6FD D22E 2FB4
Hi All,
I am Rajasekaran J.I am using debian for the past two years and we came
out with debian based disto called as BOSS(Bharat Operating System
Solutions).I would like to participate the development activity of
DebianInstaller.
Thanks & Regards,
Rajasekaran J
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
Hi Nicolas,
On Monday 18 September 2006 13:16, Nikolas Valcarcel wrote:
> Hi, i'm Nicolas Valcarcel (a.k.a. nxvl) From Lima Perú. I want to help
> in the development of the Debian installer, i have just begin to read
> the documentation in the wiki, i hope i can start asap helping you in
> the dev
On Monday 18 September 2006 13:00, Rajasekaran J. wrote:
>I am Rajasekaran J.I am using debian for the past two years and we
> came out with debian based disto called as BOSS(Bharat Operating System
> Solutions).I would like to participate the development activity of
> DebianInstaller.
Wow! A
Hello all
I just finish a new net-install with the daily builds 20060918 of testing.
I have a strange bug with the network after the first reboot.
lo become eth0
eth0 become eth1_temp
and I cannot access the network.
I try to start lspci to identify my network card but this tools missing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 387424 base-installer
Bug#387424: debian-installer: No option to install kernel/inirtd without base
system
Bug reassigned from package `rescue' to `base-installer'.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
reassign 387424 base-installer
stop
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 06:18:25PM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > reassign 387424 rescue
> Bug#387424: debian-installer: No option to install kernel/inirtd without base
> system
> Bug reassigned from
On Monday 18 September 2006 14:56, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
> I just finish a new net-install with the daily builds 20060918 of
> testing. I have a strange bug with the network after the first reboot.
> lo become eth0
> eth0 become eth1_temp
> and I cannot access the network.
Known is
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/etch_di_beta3/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a:
Linux tinsley 2.6.16-2-686 #1 Fri Aug 18 19:01:49 UTC 2006 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 2006-08-23T22_00_00+1000
Method:
How di
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/etch_di_beta3/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a:
Linux tinsley 2.6.16-2-686 #1 Fri Aug 18 19:01:49 UTC 2006 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 2006-08-23T22_00_00+1000
Method:
How di
Frans Pop a écrit :
> Known issue. Upgrade to udev from unstable.
>
How can I do that without network access ?
> Then install pci-utils...
>
Ok, but why this tool are not on the base-system ?
> Cheers,
> FJP
>
Thanks for your respons
Guy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
Hello Alastair,
I just see that you have tagged #384787 and ##384391 as "etch-ignore".
Could you please explain why?
This is IMO a fairly important usability issue for Debian Installer and as a
patch is available I don't really see a reason not to fix it in time for
Etch.
Cheers,
FJP
pgph32e
On Monday 18 September 2006 14:13, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 18 September 2006 14:56, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
> > I just finish a new net-install with the daily builds 20060918 of
> > testing. I have a strange bug with the network after the first reboot.
> > lo become eth0
>
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/etch_di_beta3/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a:
Linux tinsley 2.6.16-2-686 #1 Fri Aug 18 19:01:49 UTC 2006 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 2006-09-09T22_00_00+1000
Method:
How di
On Monday 18 September 2006 15:39, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
> Frans Pop a écrit :
> > Known issue. Upgrade to udev from unstable.
>
> How can I do that without network access ?
Use another machine to download the package and a USB stick to move it to
your machine the install using 'dpkg -i'?
> > Then
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report. It has been forwarded to the package maintainer(s)
and to other interested parties to accompany the original report.
Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTE
reassign 387424 rescue
thanks
On Monday 18 September 2006 14:35, Geert Stappers wrote:
> reassign 387424 base-installer
> stop
> > Bug#387424: debian-installer: No option to install kernel/inirtd
> > without base system Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to
> > `rescue'.
>
> IMHO does
Thanks,
I follow the procedure from this link :
http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-boot@lists.debian.org/msg77135.html
and work now.
Guy
Frans Pop a écrit :
> On Monday 18 September 2006 15:39, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
>
>> Frans Pop a écrit :
>>
>>> Known issue. Upgrade to udev from unstable.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 387424 rescue
Bug#387424: debian-installer: No option to install kernel/inirtd without base
system
Bug reassigned from package `base-installer' to `rescue'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: mini.iso
Image version: 2006-08-07
Date: 2006-09-18
Machine: Apple PowerMac G5
Processor: ppc64
Memory: 2 GB
Partitions:
Output of lspci and lspci -n:
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try
Accepted:
ttf-cjk-compact-udeb_1.6_all.udeb
to pool/main/t/ttf-cjk-compact/ttf-cjk-compact-udeb_1.6_all.udeb
ttf-cjk-compact_1.6.dsc
to pool/main/t/ttf-cjk-compact/ttf-cjk-compact_1.6.dsc
ttf-cjk-compact_1.6.tar.gz
to pool/main/t/ttf-cjk-compact/ttf-cjk-compact_1.6.tar.gz
Override entries
Well, let's assume for now that I am not crazy.
If I run g-i in vmware, I get this:
http://people.debian.org/~fjp/d-i/g-i_lineheight-and-ugly-font.png
That is almost double lineheight between choices! Also, does the font look
uglier than it used to?
/me not happy
pgpWoSPSzStNC.pgp
Description
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 10:55:12AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
> Yoe recently checked in support for a trivial udeb image. You just
> dump whatever udeb you want on the floppy, cd, usb, whatever and then
> select a menu entry to install *.udeb from that medium.
> Please do test it.
Where
On 18/09/06, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, let's assume for now that I am not crazy.
If I run g-i in vmware, I get this:
http://people.debian.org/~fjp/d-i/g-i_lineheight-and-ugly-font.png
That is almost double lineheight between choices! Also, does the font look
uglier than it used
On Monday 18 September 2006 16:31, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> Have you seen the vertical line in the upper right corner?
Yes, I already reported that one a long time ago...
pgpBpbX4HyDNX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 18/09/06, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 18 September 2006 16:31, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> Have you seen the vertical line in the upper right corner?
Yes, I already reported that one a long time ago...
Hmm, I was under the impresion that the vertical line should have been
fixe
ttf-cjk-compact_1.6_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ttf-cjk-compact_1.6.dsc
ttf-cjk-compact_1.6.tar.gz
ttf-cjk-compact-udeb_1.6_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsu
On Monday 18 September 2006 16:44, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> On 18/09/06, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Monday 18 September 2006 16:31, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> > > Have you seen the vertical line in the upper right corner?
> >
> > Yes, I already reported that one a long time ago...
>
> Hm
On Sunday 10 September 2006 10:51, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> After posting on gtk-devel, i received some answers [1] from DFB's main
> developer and GTKDFB original author, but it seems nothing is going to
> be done to add the needed functionality at the lower GDK or DFB level,
> so i propose to
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 03:43:06PM +0200, EXTERNAL Brodkorb Waldemar (Tarent;
AA-DG/ESW1) wrote:
> Package: installation-reports
>
> Boot method: mini.iso
> Image version: 2006-08-07
> Date: 2006-09-18
> Machine: Apple PowerMac G5
> Processor: ppc64
> Memory: 2 GB
> Partitions:
>
> Output of l
Joey Hess wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> Since the most central point of disagreement seems to be around the need
>> to support non-free firmware from the installation (whether by doing
>> that through supporting the non-free repository, or by just dropping
>> these firmware blobs in main, or
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 11:35:25AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> Feedback is welcome.
>
> Since the only feedback I received thus far was Goswin von Brederlow
> saying he liked the idea, and since I didn't have much else to do today
> (other than wait for a supplier...
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 11:35:25AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> Feedback is welcome.
>
> Since the only feedback I received thus far was Goswin von Brederlow
> saying he liked the idea, and since I didn't have much else to do today
> (other than wait for a supplier.
Package: installation-report
Severity: normal
See blog at
http://blog.aplpi.com/index.php/2006/09/18/debian-gnulinux-on-a-hp-nc6400/
for details. Seems to be related to bug 380351 but worked around it.
Also, didn't get option to install SMP kernel - should I?
-- System Information:
Debian R
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> reassign 387975 tasksel
Bug#387975: i18n: dont separate soft and its i18n packages (vote rating use)
Bug reassigned from package `tasksel' to `tasksel'.
>
End of message, stopping pr
You recently sent mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The e-mail address, [EMAIL PROTECTED], has been changed.
The new e-mail address is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your mail was forwarded to the new address; you do not need to resend it.
This message was sent automatically. No reply is necessary.
--
To UNSUBSC
On Sep 18, 2006, at 10:17 AM, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
Frans Pop a écrit :
The d-i team is not responsible for what is part of the base
system and
what is not.
Then who is? Where should I send a bug report?
On Sep 16, 2006, at 3:16 AM, Frans Pop wrote:
When I switched to the -F2 console, it give me an unexpected
error message:
Known issue. Fixed in rootskel 1.37.
Any idea when that will make it into a daily businesscard iso?
Rick
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Hi-
I just attempted an AMD64 install today, and the same problem
happened, i.e. the installer runs 2.6.17 but it installs kernel
2.6.16, which breaks HP servers (see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/
bugreport.cgi?bug=384202 ) .
Erik
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
Package: installation-guide
Version: 20060726
Severity: minor
"ssh" is pronounced as "ess ess haych".
"ess" begins with a vowel, so "an" should be used, not "a".
These strings need s/a ssh/an ssh/ :
./da/preparing/install-overview.xml:Open a ssh connection to the new system.
./da/preparing/insta
On Monday 18 September 2006 20:22, Dykema, Erik wrote:
> I just attempted an AMD64 install today, and the same problem
> happened, i.e. the installer runs 2.6.17 but it installs kernel
> 2.6.16, which breaks HP servers (see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/
> bugreport.cgi?bug=384202 ) .
Yes,
On Monday 18 September 2006 21:49, Rick Thomas wrote:
> On Sep 18, 2006, at 10:17 AM, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
> > Frans Pop a écrit :
> >> The d-i team is not responsible for what is part of the base
> >> system and what is not.
>
> Then who is? Where should I send a bug report?
What is your rational
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 10:34:37PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 03:35:17PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
> >
> > On Sep 16, 2006, at 3:05 PM, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > >On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 09:50:03AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > >>On Saturday 16 September 2006 09:09, Rick T
Hello Rick, Frans
Rick Thomas a écrit :
>
> On Sep 18, 2006, at 10:17 AM, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
>
>> Frans Pop a écrit :
>>>
>>> The d-i team is not responsible for what is part of the base system and
>>> what is not.
>
> Then who is? Where should I send a bug report?
>
Yes, I'am surprising also ab
Hello Frans
> Correct place to file a bug report would be the pseudo package "base", but
> I strongly suggest you do not file a bug for this.
>
I not consider that is a bug, but an essential functionality that are
missing just after a bad reboot.
Regards
Guy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM
On Monday 18 September 2006 23:26, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
> I not consider that is a bug, but an essential functionality that are
> missing just after a bad reboot.
No it is not as the installer has already saved the info
in /var/log/installer/.
And even after a bad reboot it is hardly "essential" (
Package: base
On Sep 18, 2006, at 4:57 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 18 September 2006 21:49, Rick Thomas wrote:
On Sep 18, 2006, at 10:17 AM, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
Frans Pop a écrit :
The d-i team is not responsible for what is part of the base
system and what is not.
Then who is? Where s
Your message dated Mon, 18 Sep 2006 14:17:24 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388035: fixed in console-data 2:1.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 11:24:17PM +0200, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
> Rick Thomas a écrit :
> > On Sep 18, 2006, at 10:17 AM, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
> >> Frans Pop a écrit :
> >>>
> >>> The d-i team is not responsible for what is part of the base system and
> >>> what is not.
> >
> > Then who is? Where sho
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 04:53:40PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Hmm, I was under the impresion that the vertical line should have been
> > fixed at the same time as horizontal issue was fixed.
>
> Well, as the horizontal one is not yet fixed either that impression is
> probably correct ;-)
both f
Your message dated Tue, 19 Sep 2006 00:12:01 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388114: installation-report: Installed on HP NC6400 went
ok but had problem with grub install
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 04:25:42PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> Well, let's assume for now that I am not crazy.
>
> If I run g-i in vmware, I get this:
> http://people.debian.org/~fjp/d-i/g-i_lineheight-and-ugly-font.png
>
> That is almost double lineheight between choices! Also, does the font look
Frans Pop wrote:
On Sunday 10 September 2006 10:51, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
After posting on gtk-devel, i received some answers [1] from DFB's main
developer and GTKDFB original author, but it seems nothing is going to
be done to add the needed functionality at the lower GDK or DFB level,
so
Accepted:
rootskel-gtk_0.10.dsc
to pool/main/r/rootskel-gtk/rootskel-gtk_0.10.dsc
rootskel-gtk_0.10.tar.gz
to pool/main/r/rootskel-gtk/rootskel-gtk_0.10.tar.gz
rootskel-gtk_0.10_i386.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel-gtk/rootskel-gtk_0.10_i386.udeb
Override entries for your package:
rootskel-gt
rootskel-gtk_0.10_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rootskel-gtk_0.10.dsc
rootskel-gtk_0.10.tar.gz
rootskel-gtk_0.10_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 12:33:35PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 11:16:02AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > This is strange. I know one of the core grub2 maintainers is using
> > > powerpc
> > > regularly (with code from C
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 10:57:24PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 18 September 2006 21:49, Rick Thomas wrote:
> > On Sep 18, 2006, at 10:17 AM, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
> > > Frans Pop a écrit :
> > >> The d-i team is not responsible for what is part of the base
> > >> system and what is not.
> >
>
Your message dated Tue, 19 Sep 2006 08:29:39 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug no more relevant
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit
Your message dated Tue, 19 Sep 2006 08:29:39 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug no more relevant
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 251423 kbd-chooser
Bug#251423: Give users some hints about possible keyboards
Bug reassigned from package `console-common' to `kbd-chooser'.
> forcemerge 248882 251423
Bug#248882: Provive an option to test a keyboard map
Bug#251423: Give users
63 matches
Mail list logo