Your message dated Tue, 5 Sep 2006 06:51:35 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#385768: installation-reports: Failed to reboot x86 SCSI
system
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
On Tue, September 5, 2006 1:22, Max Vozeler said:
> What I think needs to be solved before a first upload:
>...
> 2. Dependencies. I think they need to be tightened a bit
Will do
> 3. Yet a bit more code could perhaps be dropped, I think :-)
I'll take a look at it
> 4. debian/copyright st
* Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060903 22:18]:
> Quoting Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > * Loïc Minier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060903 20:07]:
> > > Would be nice if someone could ack the update of gtk+2.0 from 2.8.18-1
> > > to 2.8.20-1 in testing and even hint it if possible.
> >
>
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 05:53:33PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Tapio Lehtonen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Package: installation-guide
> > Version: Id: preseed.xml 39932 2006-08-17 22:42:15Z joeyh
> > Severity: minor
> >
> >
> > *** preseed.xml 2006-08-18 11:49:44.0 +0300
>
Hi,
In the discussion about firmware-in-main, one argument that has come up
consistently is the fact that d-i doesn't currently support non-free,
and that implementing this support would take a significant development
effort. AIUI, anna would need to be updated to support multiple
installation sou
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 10:36:46AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> There is an ABI bump scheduled for after beta3.
I cancel this bump for pre-etch.
The main reason for this was the final implemention of support for more
than one packages file. But implementing this in a correct way needs
more modif
And replied to debian-boot, let's see if this time it is not ignored like it
was so many times in the past.
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 02:16:09PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 01:12:18PM +0200, Xavier Grave wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I hope these informations will be of some use...
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 12:05:48PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 10:36:46AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > There is an ABI bump scheduled for after beta3.
>
> I cancel this bump for pre-etch.
>
> The main reason for this was the final implemention of support for more
> th
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 03:29:44PM +0200, Xavier Grave wrote:
> Le mardi 05 septembre 2006 à 14:16 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit :
> > On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 01:12:18PM +0200, Xavier Grave wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I hope these informations will be of some use...
> > > I've downloaded the CD neti
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 11:35:25AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Feedback is welcome.
Since the only feedback I received thus far was Goswin von Brederlow
saying he liked the idea, and since I didn't have much else to do today
(other than wait for a supplier...), I went ahead and wrote it. It's
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 06:04:38PM +0200, Xavier Grave wrote:
> I have restarted an install. I will save the log before reboot, install
> the linux-powerpc64 image and don't delete the comptent of /boot...
> Hope it will be enought...
There is a nice 'save logs' item on the menu, which starts a mi
I have restarted an install. I will save the log before reboot, install
the linux-powerpc64 image and don't delete the comptent of /boot...
Hope it will be enought...
Le mardi 05 septembre 2006 à 16:05 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit :
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 03:29:44PM +0200, Xavier Grave wrote:
> >
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Since the most central point of disagreement seems to be around the need
> to support non-free firmware from the installation (whether by doing
> that through supporting the non-free repository, or by just dropping
> these firmware blobs in main, or whatnot), I'm trying to
I noticed that with the reogranisation of the partman-auto menu, the
defaults have changed. Before, the menu would default to
autopartitioning the first hard disk. Now the default is manual
partitioning. This means that preseeding files need to be changed since
they can't assume the default, and it
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 3.1r1
uname -a: Linux Sarafina 2.4.27-3sparc64 #1 Fri Jun 2 07:35:41 UTC
2006 Sparc64 GNU/Linux
Date: 08/31/06
Method: Boot from CD Rom Drive with Internet install over home
network
Machine: Tatung COMP Ultra10
Processor:Spa
Hello,
On fresh installed computer with two NICs
appears this during boot:
|Begin: Running /scripts/init-premount ...
|CMD646: IDE controller at PCI slot :01:03.0
|CMD646: chipset revision 3
|CMD646: chipset revision 0x03, MultiWord DMA Force Limited
|CMD646: 100% native mode on irq 4,7e0
|
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 04:07:10PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > Since the most central point of disagreement seems to be around the need
> > to support non-free firmware from the installation (whether by doing
> > that through supporting the non-free repository, or by just d
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 01:21:51PM +0200, Max Vozeler wrote:
> Hi Geert,
Hello Max,
> On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 11:23:11AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> >
> > Not having eth1 is not good.
>
> Can you confirm whether eth1 is now detected correctly?
After install, with kernel 2.6.16-2-sparc64,
is
hi guys,
i complete the report about Installation on netra X1 but with last
weekly build from 20060828
installed from:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/sparc/iso-dvd/
Network config issue
../..
> That said, this won't be fixed for Sarge anymore and the instal
> So there are cases of:
> * CD-ROM drives needing firmware somewhere along the path (IDE/SATA
> controller, drive itself perhaps?, more stuff...)
If you have a cdrom behind a firmware requiring scsi controller. Not so
likely, but not completely impossible. I have never seen
cdrom drives requiri
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> tags 385927 + pending
Bug#385927: debian-installer: Swap over LVM over crypt not allowed
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Plea
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> partitioning themselves. I think this default should be changed back to
> autopartitioning the first disk.
Seconded, of course.
How did that happen? I would guess this was by accident because such
action (reordering partman menu) has never been discusse
Your message dated Tue, 5 Sep 2006 23:25:24 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386186: Sparc Debian 3.1 install
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
23 matches
Mail list logo
