Bug#380585: debian 3.1 install FD

package: debian install FD version: 3.1 I can not complete install from FD. I'm using USB keybord. After initrd.gz is read, Insmod error "hid.o" is displayed. Ten USB keyboard halts. Tere is not "hid.o" in "initrd.gz" in boot FD. _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ 愛媛新聞エリアサービス北条東 清水宏之

Processed: Re: Bug#380585: debian 3.1 install FD

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 380585 installation-reports Bug#380585: debian 3.1 install FD Warning: Unknown package 'debian' Warning: Unknown package 'fd' Bug reassigned from package `debian install fd' to `installation-reports'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please con

Bug#379120: lspci present on i386, verify on powerpc

Hi, On Saturday 29 July 2006 22:40, Geert Stappers wrote: > On a i386 is lspci present in the recent builds op debian-installer. > > While the installer waits for a keyboard selection, > I switched to the second console and typed `lspci` > and got the output of lspci. > > Could this be verified on

Bug#379120: lspci present on i386, verify on powerpc

On 29/07/06, Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On a i386 is lspci present in the recent builds op debian-installer. While the installer waits for a keyboard selection, I switched to the second console and typed `lspci` and got the output of lspci. Could this be verified on a powerpc co

Processing of lowmem_1.20_i386.changes

lowmem_1.20_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: lowmem_1.20.dsc lowmem_1.20.tar.gz lowmem_1.20_all.udeb lowmemcheck_1.20_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe"

lowmem_1.20_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: lowmem_1.20.dsc to pool/main/l/lowmem/lowmem_1.20.dsc lowmem_1.20.tar.gz to pool/main/l/lowmem/lowmem_1.20.tar.gz lowmem_1.20_all.udeb to pool/main/l/lowmem/lowmem_1.20_all.udeb lowmemcheck_1.20_i386.udeb to pool/main/l/lowmem/lowmemcheck_1.20_i386.udeb Override entries for you

Bug#379789: wrong keymap on Intel MacBook Pro

reassign 379789 kbd-chooser retitle 379789 wrong keymap on Intel MacBook Pro thanks On Tuesday 25 July 2006 18:05, Rüdiger Braun wrote: > I had chosen the german keyboard > > (1) During installation, on the screen "Benutzer und Passwörter" I > tried to enter an umlaut (namely Rüdiger). The Umlau

Processed: Re: Bug#379789: wrong keymap on Intel MacBook Pro

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 379789 kbd-chooser Bug#379789: Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `kbd-chooser'. > retitle 379789 wrong keymap on Intel MacBook Pro Bug#379789: Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if y

General question

Dear developers, I would be pleased, if you could tell me your thoughts about some points, which came in my mind. 1. In the past I discovered the project "FAI" by Thomas Lange and changed it to the possibility to install not as Thomas` version Debian sarge, but Debian etch (and sid,too). Every

Re: D-I Beta 3 - release update - please test

(Please reply only to debian-boot; reply-to set accordingly; add other recipients only selectively) A week since the planning was posted, time for an update. Thanks to James, the upload of d-i was processed very quickly. Since then various, mostly minor issues have been identified and resolved.

Re: d-i with GRUB

"Eddy Petrişor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Cons: >> >> - no pretty splash image (this could be compensated with Linux bootsplash >> support, though). > Why? Grub supports splash images. Any reason not to use that (except > the size of the initrd?) It has but isn't that good. >> - no

Processing of linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6_0.66sarge2_m68k.changes

linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6_0.66sarge2_m68k.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: fat-modules-2.6.8-mvme147-di_0.66sarge2_m68k.udeb scsi-modules-2.6.8-amiga-di_0.66sarge2_m68k.udeb scsi-modules-2.6.8-mvme16x-di_0.66sarge2_m68k.udeb jfs-modules-2.6.8-amiga-di_0.66sar

Processing of base-installer_1.13.4sarge1_i386.changes

base-installer_1.13.4sarge1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: base-installer_1.13.4sarge1.dsc base-installer_1.13.4sarge1.tar.gz base-installer_1.13.4sarge1_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC

Bug#379120: lspci present on i386, verify on powerpc

I booted my test beige G3 (oldworld) from the miboot floppies with the July 30'th businesscard CD in the CDrom drive. I was also able to do 'lspci' at keyboard selection time. Rick On Jul 31, 2006, at 6:04 AM, Eddy Petrişor wrote: On 29/07/06, Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: O

Bug#380648: installation report

Package: installation-reports Boot method: netinst CD Image version: etch daily image 31. Aug 2006 Date: 20060731 18:00 Machine: Custom dual Athlon MP with Tyan mainboard Processor: Athlon MP 2000+ Memory: 1.5G Partitions: 2x18G SCSI disks, each with 17G RAID partition and 1G swap. both RAID

Bug#380650: Successful Installation beta3 amd64

Package: installation-reports Boot method: debian-testing-amd64-netinst(3).iso Image version: http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ downloaded 31/7/06 Install Date: 31 July 06 c.12noon Machine: Acer Aspire 1524WLMi Processor: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3400+ Memory: 512MB Partitions: D

Bug#379120: marked as done (lspci is missing)

Your message dated Mon, 31 Jul 2006 17:53:38 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#379120: lspci present on i386, verify on powerpc, Closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Bug#380648: installation report, known issue

On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 06:24:25PM +0300, Meelis Roos wrote: > Package: installation-reports > > Boot method: netinst CD > Image version: etch daily image 31. Aug 2006 s/Aug/Jul/ > Date: 20060731 18:00 > Mount partitions: [O] > Install base system:[O] > In

Bug#380650: Running aptitude demands the Install disk to be reinserted

Hi Having completed a successful base installation, I thought I'd add X etc. Everytime I install stuff it asks for the disk. Commenting out the cdrom in the sources.list makes it OK. However, a newcomer to Debian may take a while to work it out. I guess only installing the base system missed t

Re: Not very happy with new directfb upload

Hi, On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 03:42:31 +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Monday 31 July 2006 03:20, Steve Langasek wrote: > > He did request approval for this transition on debian-release earlier > > in the month, and there were no objections raised: > >

Re: Bug#379120: lspci present on i386, verify on powerpc

On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 11:42:26AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote: > I booted my test beige G3 (oldworld) from the miboot floppies with > the July 30'th businesscard CD in the CDrom drive. I was also able > to do 'lspci' at keyboard selection time. Hello Rick, Thank you for your feedback and espec

Re: bugreport twice in the Reply-To field

On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 11:42:51AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Saturday 29 July 2006 22:40, Geert Stappers wrote: > > > > [ posting to bugreport and debian-powerpc ML ] > > > > Could this be verified on a powerpc computer? > > Same on powerpc with the 2006-07-27 build. > > > > The Reply-To:

D-I 3 (FAILED) installation report for Sparc (Ultra 10) port.

Please see below, the 'failed installation' report for D-I 3.Thanks,Chris.Package: installation-reportsBoot method: Image version: < http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/sparc/iso-cd/debian-testing-sparc-netinst.iso 31 Jul 06>Date: <31 Jul 06 1800GMT>Machine: Processor:

how select cdrom install at the debian installer?

Hello, In july 31 I downloaded the 2 first images from: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/i386/jigdo-cd I read http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.i386/apa.html http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/ and browsed http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller but still unable to find how do I

Bug#380650: marked as done (Successful Installation beta3 amd64)

Your message dated Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:41:56 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#380650: Successful Installation beta3 amd64 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Re: D-I 3 (FAILED) installation report for Sparc (Ultra 10) port.

(Please file the installation report to the BTS next time by sending it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with as first line Package: installation-reports) On Monday 31 July 2006 19:59, Chris Andrew wrote: > Comments/Problems: > I booted the CD, and then selected the standard 'install' at the boot > prompt.

Bug#379067: netinst CD should not be added to sources list of target system

reopen 379067 thanks Reopening this bug as it was reassigned to apt-setup because of a different issue than the lspci one. IMO the request to not add netinst CDs to the sources.list is valid. It was also noted in #380650 by Clive Menzies. See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=379

Processed: Bug#379067: netinst CD should not be added to sources list of target system

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 379067 Bug#379067: netinst CD should not be added to sources list of target system Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (adm

Re: [D-I Manual] Build log for en (30 Jul 2006)

Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: « A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN. « « Updated files ('svn up') « Uen/appendix/plip.xml L103: If you need to set paramenters... « U en/appendix/preseed.xml L993: "The value of this parameter can b

Re: Not very happy with new directfb upload

On Monday 31 July 2006 19:32, Guillem Jover wrote: > No problem. Anyway I'm sorry for the delay, as I left for 4 days or so > and was expecting to have net access. Also I asked for the transition > taking into account d-i, but missed the fact that libcairo was used by > it, and thought that the who

Bug#380650: Running aptitude demands the Install disk to be reinserted

On (31/07/06 20:58), Geert Stappers wrote: > On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 05:47:36PM +0100, Clive Menzies wrote: > > Hi > > > > Having completed a successful base installation, I thought I'd add X > > etc. Everytime I install stuff it asks for the disk. Commenting out > > the cdrom in the sources.lis

Bug#380586: Package: installation-reports

On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 01:55:19PM +0800, laowb(raul); wrote: [ no version of d-i, 'sata' ] > Comments/Problems: > Seemed no response after showing "Loading module 'sd_mod' for 'SCSI > disk support'...", I had waited about 15 minutes. I think an old version of debian-installer is use

Processed: Re: Bug#380585: debian 3.1 install FD

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 380585 d-i: floppy install fails for USB keyboards Bug#380585: debian 3.1 install FD Changed Bug title. > severity 380585 important Bug#380585: d-i: floppy install fails for USB keyboards Severity set to `important' from `normal' > End of mess

Bug#380650: Running aptitude demands the Install disk to be reinserted

On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 05:47:36PM +0100, Clive Menzies wrote: > Hi > > Having completed a successful base installation, I thought I'd add X > etc. Everytime I install stuff it asks for the disk. Commenting out > the cdrom in the sources.list makes it OK. However, a newcomer to > Debian may tak

Processed: Re: Bug#380586: Package: installation-reports tagged

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 380586 moreinfo Bug#380586: Package: installation-reports There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Re: D-I 3 (FAILED) installation report for Sparc (Ultra 10) port.

Frans,The email said "Reply only to Debian-boot".My OBP is 3.31, and as you said, you did a netinst, not a CDROM.  At the moment, I do not have anything installed on the Ultra, so will have to get back to you, regarding the lspci and prtconf.  I have 256 megs of RAM. Cheers,Chris.On 31/07/06, Frans

Bug#380650: Running aptitude demands the Install disk to be reinserted

On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 08:17:18PM +0100, Clive Menzies wrote: > On (31/07/06 20:58), Geert Stappers wrote: > > > > Installs from CD assume further installation from CD, > > they can surely not assume a nice connection to the Internet ... > > Yes... except I installed from the netinst.iso :) Yep

Bug#380265: Package: installation-reports

Hi, Thanks for the response. With the images from http://www-timc.imag.fr/Sylvain.Ferriol/debian/d-i/i386/ it works great! Hope this will be in the official release. In my last mail I didn't mention the problem the installer had with the SATA drive. With previous images I had to set the HD to

Bug#380648: installation report

On Monday 31 July 2006 17:24, Meelis Roos wrote: > Comments/Problems: > Install worked fine but arter reboot the machine did not come up. > Then: > Done. > stdin: error 0 > Begin: Running /scripts/local-premount ... > Done. > > Then an error from modprobe: > > Usage: modprobe [-v] ... Looks like

Re: D-I 3 (FAILED) installation report for Sparc (Ultra 10) port.

On Monday 31 July 2006 22:30, Chris Andrew wrote: > My OBP is 3.31, and as you said, you did a netinst, not a CDROM. No, the netinst is a CDROM image; see the name of the image you downloaded. You're confusing it with netboot (which is a common mistake). > At the moment, I do not have anything i

Bug#380586: Package: installation-reports

On Monday 31 July 2006 21:17, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 01:55:19PM +0800, laowb(raul); wrote: > > Comments/Problems: > > Seemed no response after showing "Loading module 'sd_mod' for > > 'SCSI disk support'...", I had waited about 15 minutes. > > I think an old version o

Bug#258907: This bug can be closed. It's no longer relevant.

Thanks! Rick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#262201: Please close this bug. It's no longer relevant.

Please close this bug. It's no longer relevant. I believe it has been fixed in the released "sarge" installer. Thanks! Rick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#262198: Please close this bug. It's no longer relevant.

Please close this bug. It's no longer relevant. Thanks! Rick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#262201: marked as done (PowerMac (OldWorld) - no driver for onboard SCSI)

Your message dated Tue, 01 Aug 2006 01:04:14 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#262201: Please close this bug. It's no longer relevant. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Bug#262198: marked as done ("Partition hard drives" fails on powerpc OldWorld PowerMac in 20040729 businesscard install.)

Your message dated Tue, 01 Aug 2006 01:05:33 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#262198: Please close this bug. It's no longer relevant. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Bug#258907: marked as done (Kernel 2.6 OldWorld PowerMac businesscard daily CD 2004/07/11 fails initial reboot)

Your message dated Tue, 01 Aug 2006 00:42:53 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#258907: This bug can be closed. It's no longer relevant. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Bug#380694: Successful repeat installation on amd64 incl. grub

Package: installation-reports Boot method: debian-testing-amd64-netinst(3).iso Image version: http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ downloaded 31/7/06 Date: 31 July 06 20:30 Machine: Acer Aspire 1524WLMi Processor: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3400+ Memory: 512Mb Partitions: Disk /dev/hda

Bug#380718: lspci command not present after reboot in non-Desktop configuration

Package: installation-reports Note: This is not the same bug as #379120. This bug report is about the condition after the reboot. It's not about the time during installation -- before the reboot. It seems that lspci is pulled in by the "Desktop" task. It's absent after the reboot in a "b