Hi,
our original plan has been to release the d-i RC on 14th August, and
freeze the kernel for this on July 30th. Is this plan still current? If
so, can we expect an acceptable kernel on these days? The plan also
included a small window around October 15th to allow an ABI bump / a new
kernel versi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>ADSL does not imply PPPoE though. I have ADSL too, but don't need PPPoE.
In some countries (e.g. DE, IT) is always does for consumer connections.
--
ciao,
Marco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PRO
* Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060716 10:59]:
> our original plan has been to release the d-i RC on 14th August, and
> freeze the kernel for this on July 30th. Is this plan still current? If
> so, can we expect an acceptable kernel on these days?
Also, obviously I forgot to ask something - h
On Jul 15, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is this libcrypto dependency strictly needed (what for) or could the
> udeb be built in a way that it's needed? libcrypto0.9.8-udeb appears
> to be about a meg in size while ntpdate has less than 50K.
It's still very big. For d-i we should
Hi,
On Saturday 15 July 2006 19:58, Frans Pop wrote:
> ADSL does not imply PPPoE though. I have ADSL too, but don't need PPPoE.
What do you need then? PPPoA?
In germany PPPoE is the defacto-standard for ADSL & home users.
regards,
Holger
pgpOXylzm4DJl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 11:19:17AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jul 15, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Is this libcrypto dependency strictly needed (what for) or could the
> > udeb be built in a way that it's needed? libcrypto0.9.8-udeb appears
> > to be about a meg in size
On Jul 16, Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It's still very big. For d-i we should use a simpler SNTP-only client,
> > which would not be bigger than a few KB.
> sntp was never part of the debian ntp package, and has license
> problems so is removed in the current svn version. As it is
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 12:23:07PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jul 16, Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > It's still very big. For d-i we should use a simpler SNTP-only client,
> > > which would not be bigger than a few KB.
> > sntp was never part of the debian ntp package, and has
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 10:59:05AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> our original plan has been to release the d-i RC on 14th August, and
> freeze the kernel for this on July 30th. Is this plan still current?
What do you mean with "our"?
>
* Bastian Blank ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060716 12:55]:
> [ non-cooperative things ]
Could please someone from the kernel team who is coorporative handle
this issue? If we don't manage to act together, we cannot release in
time or even not at all, and that would be really sad.
Also, please note that
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 279870 +wontfix
Bug#279870: lha: Several security vulnerabilites (2004-0745 and possibly others)
Tags were: security woody
Tags added: wontfix
> tags 286210 +wontfix
Bug#286210: libpng-dev: Broken on upgrades
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wo
On Sunday 16 July 2006 08:21, A. Maitland Bottoms wrote:
> OK,
> Following the wiki page:
> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/PartmanCrypto
>
> under the heading:
> Building a partman-crypto enabled d-i iso image
>
> results in a mini.iso that fails the iso-scan
> test for a valid Debian iso i
ATM there are 30+55 errors (suspect variables + level specific errors)
in level1 translations (see [1]).
Languages currently affected:
+---+--+-+
| lang | susp | spec|
+---+--+-+
| bn| | x |
| bs| | x |
| eo| x| |
| fa| x| x |
|
On Sunday 16 July 2006 15:09, Davide Viti wrote:
> Please spend a few minutes to fix those so that we'll have a (nearly)
> error-free set of translations for next release:)
I'm afraid it is too late for the Beta 3 release as package uploads have
already taken place [1,2].
However, these errors s
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/etch_di_beta2/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-businesscard.iso
(2006-06-15)
Date: 2006-06-15 and retry on 2006-06-16
Machine: Micron Electronics NetFRAME 2101
Processor: Intel Pentium III 450mhz
Memor
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/etch_di_beta2/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-businesscard.iso
(2006-06-15)
Date: 2006-06-15 and retry on 2006-06-16
Machine: Micron Electronics NetFRAME 2101
Processor: Intel Pentium III 450mhz
Memor
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 10:59:05AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> our original plan has been to release the d-i RC on 14th August, and
> freeze the kernel for this on July 30th. Is this plan still current? If
> so, can we expect an acceptable kernel on these days?
We should try to meet the original
On Sunday 16 July 2006 16:08, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> I would like to point out the we will not allow a release of Etch with
> a vulnerable kernel, as it happened with Sarge, and from discussions on
> IRC I am sure this is a consensus. Updating and building the kernel
> images, udebs and the ins
On 16/07/06, Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ATM there are 30+55 errors (suspect variables + level specific errors)
in level1 translations (see [1]).
Languages currently affected:
[snip]
Please spend a few minutes to fix those so that we'll have a (nearly)
error-free set of translations
Hello,
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 11:26:04AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Also, obviously I forgot to ask something - how does the firmware issue
> look like to you? Are there critical parts of non-free firmware we need
> to have in the installer? Or is all firmware now remote enough to say
> "well,
* Frederik Schueler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060716 16:15]:
> Due to various problems, 2.6.16 has not made it into testing yet,
> sadly postponing the BETA3 release of D-I.
> The two local root vulnerabilities have delayed this even more now,
> but latest Linux-2.6.16 was uploaded with urgency=high i
FYI,
regards,
Davide
- Forwarded message from Ben Laenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Ben Laenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 17:25:17 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [DejaVu-fonts] DejaVu fonts 2.8 released
Hi all,
Hello,
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 03:09:55PM +0200, Davide Viti wrote:
> ATM there are 30+55 errors (suspect variables + level specific errors)
> in level1 translations (see [1]).
> Languages currently affected:
> | pt_BR | x| |
I've just fixed the single suspect for pt_BR, which in fact w
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 12:58:32PM -0300, Andre Luis Lopes wrote:
> I've just fixed the single suspect for pt_BR, which in fact was really an
> error.
>
> Thanks for giving a notice :-)
thanx for fixing it.
Your changes will be reflected on the spellchecker page tomorrow around 11 UTC.
ciao,
Da
* Frederik Schueler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060716 16:54]:
> The kernel firmware issue has not been solved yet in Debian. Plans for
> a GR to decide if and which firmware is distributable in Debian after the
> "editorial changes" to the SC have never been realized.
>
> Currently, distributing appro
Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> | eo| x| |
[...]
> Please spend a few minutes to fix those so that we'll have a (nearly)
> error-free set of translations for next release:)
> Please do not hesitate to ask if there are any doubts.
Is
http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/svn/debian-installer/p
72154c2deb34bf018-2]
Jul 16 17:00:58 base-installer: Scanning disc for index files..
Jul 16 17:00:58 base-installer: Found 1 package indexes, 0 source indexes and 0
signatures
Jul 16 17:00:58 base-installer: Found label 'Debian GNU/Linux testing _Etch_ -
Official Snapshot i386 Binary-1 (200
I have a new email address!You can now email me at: [EMAIL PROTECTED]I Nalele Thambo, Manager of a bank in Africa I have a Business proposal if intrested get back to me- MR.NALELE THAMBO
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jul 2006 19:12:00 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#378452: is a duplicate of #378453
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 05:54:47PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > | eo| x| |
> http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/svn/debian-installer/packages/partman/partman-lvm/debian/po/eo.po
> the right partman-lvm.templates file? I downloaded the
> eo.tar.gz but it was not
On Sun, 2006-07-16 at 17:54 +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> | eo| x| |
[...]
> Please spend a few minutes to fix those so that we'll have a (nearly)
> error-free set of translations for next release:)
> Please do not hesitate to ask if there are any doubts.
On Sunday 16 July 2006 18:56, A. Maitland Bottoms wrote:
> Is there supposed to be a full debian package like
> cryptsetup_1.0.3-3_i386.deb in the iso image too?
Yes, but that was indeed missing. I've now added that to the debian-cd
rules; it should be included on the next daily builds.
Thanks f
I was able to install a working system with no problem using the netinst image
instead of the businesscard image. I think this is caused by a problem with
the package mentioned in the initial report.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
Could anybody please move that to the repository? Bug still is there...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jul 2006 21:20:31 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line retitling, closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 359432 [OldStable-only] install-doc: please finish /usr/doc transition
Bug#359432: install-doc: please finish /usr/doc transition
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug track
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jul 2006 22:36:22 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#378453: Netinst image works, businesscard does not
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
On Sunday 16 July 2006 20:59, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> Could anybody please move that to the repository? Bug still is there...
It will be part of the next point release for stable. Fixed package is
currently available from proposed-updates.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package installation-reports
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: installation-reports
> clone 373221 -1
Bug#373221: installation-reports: installer ignores unusual default gateway
Bug 373221 cloned as bug 378506.
> reassign -1 ifupdown
Bug#378506: installa
also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.08.0008 +0200]:
> >mdadm: --auto=yes requires a 'standard' md device name,
> >not /dev/.tmp.md0
I just saw an Ubuntu Breezy Live CD with mdadm 1.11.0 use
/dev/.tmp.md0 too... I think this must be something
Debian-specific... but what
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.14
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: cd
Image version: netinstall i386
Date: 2006-07-17
Machine: Asus A8V-E
Partitions:
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please ela
41 matches
Mail list logo
