Hi Christian,
Following a couple of links I noticed a minor problem in [1];
In the table on top of the page, "Percent world population" row,
Both Etch beta 3 and post beta 3 : "56 to 50%".
Shouldn't that be 56 to 60% ?
Ciao,
Davide
[1] http://people.debian.org/~bubulle/d-i/i18n-doc/languages.h
On 6/23/06, Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 01:33:16AM +0600, Jamil Ahmed wrote:
> Which version are you using?
Version: 20060501cvs-2
we use the udeb where many glyphs were removed for reducing memory footprint
By anychance did you remove the glyphs of conjun
On 6/23/06, Viti Davide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Version: 20060501cvs-2
> > we use the udeb where many glyphs were removed for reducing memory
> > footprint
>
> By anychance did you remove the glyphs of conjunts? :-)
Do they fall on any of the following ranges?
ranges="$ranges u0400:u052F
> > Version: 20060501cvs-2
> > we use the udeb where many glyphs were removed for reducing memory
> > footprint
>
> By anychance did you remove the glyphs of conjunts? :-)
Do they fall on any of the following ranges?
ranges="$ranges u0400:u052F" # Cyrilic
ranges="$ranges u0530:u058F" # Armenian
On 6/23/06, Viti Davide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Version: 20060501cvs-2
> > we use the udeb where many glyphs were removed for reducing memory
> > footprint
>
> By anychance did you remove the glyphs of conjunts? :-)
Do they fall on any of the following ranges?
ranges="$ranges u0400:u052F
Accepted:
finish-install_2.2.dsc
to pool/main/f/finish-install/finish-install_2.2.dsc
finish-install_2.2.tar.gz
to pool/main/f/finish-install/finish-install_2.2.tar.gz
finish-install_2.2_all.udeb
to pool/main/f/finish-install/finish-install_2.2_all.udeb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lis
finish-install_2.2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
finish-install_2.2.dsc
finish-install_2.2.tar.gz
finish-install_2.2_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
On Friday 23 June 2006 03:17, Joey Hess wrote:
> Er, there were no code changes that could impact this between
> prebaseconfig and finish-install. 20final-message exits 10, and the
> postinst detects an exit value of 10 and takes down the progress bar
> and exits. Same code as was in prebaseconfig.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 375045 + fixed
Bug#375045: finish-install: from final dialog broken
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Deb
tag 375045 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 10:37:33 +0200
Source: finish-install
Binary: finish-install
Architecture: source
Your message dated Fri, 23 Jun 2006 10:52:40 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Not an NMU
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reope
Quoting Viti Davide ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi Christian,
> Following a couple of links I noticed a minor problem in [1];
> In the table on top of the page, "Percent world population" row,
> Both Etch beta 3 and post beta 3 : "56 to 50%".
> Shouldn't that be 56 to 60% ?
Not exactly, but the error
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 11:54:24AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> You're taking it too disastrously. The problem I'm trying to solve is
> when the max mount count is reached, this is the case in which the
> forced fscks becomes annoying. Whether the forced fsck is done this
> time around or only on
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 11:40:17AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Robert wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 04:40:05PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > > The inconvenience could be ameliorated if the force-fsck mount counter
> > > could be staggered for each partition. For instance, the first
> > > pa
linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.10_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.10.dsc
linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.10.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.16-2-amd64-generic-di_1.10_amd64.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.16-2-amd64-generic-di_1.10_amd64.udeb
nic-e
Accepted:
acpi-modules-2.6.16-2-amd64-generic-di_1.10_amd64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/acpi-modules-2.6.16-2-amd64-generic-di_1.10_amd64.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-amd64-generic-di_1.10_amd64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-a
Accepted:
partman-base_87.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-base/partman-base_87.dsc
partman-base_87.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-base/partman-base_87.tar.gz
partman-base_87_i386.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-base/partman-base_87_i386.udeb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Thank
partman-base_87_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-base_87.dsc
partman-base_87.tar.gz
partman-base_87_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 13:39 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 11:54:24AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > You're taking it too disastrously. The problem I'm trying to solve is
> > when the max mount count is reached, this is the case in which the
> > forced fscks becomes annoyi
On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 13:42 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 11:40:17AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > Robert wrote:
> > >
> > > as far as i know it's also possible to set the counter to a specific
> > > value, which might be better. so make them all be checked after 20
> >
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 11:50:55PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> remount setting that would want to be staggered. Staggering the counter
> would in a sense only work the first time round.
More precise, it would work until the first unclean shutdown and
subsequent forced fsck.
However, seen as tho
Everyone,
Currently I am trying to fully automate an install of Debian and have to 2 issues
early in the install process and a question about aptitude.
The first issue below is with mirror country using ftp protocol. The
section of the preseed file is listed below in which I
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 11:42:59AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > quik uses the input-device and output-device of openfirmware as the
> > console. Unfortunately many old world macs default to a serial console
> > for openfirmware thus the user never sees the quik boot screen, and
> > can't s
Accepted:
crypto-modules-2.6.16-2-s390-di_0.04_s390.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6/crypto-modules-2.6.16-2-s390-di_0.04_s390.udeb
dasd-modules-2.6.16-2-s390-di_0.04_s390.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6/dasd-modules-2.6.16-2-s390-di_0.04_s390.udeb
fat-modules-2.6.16
Index: installer/build/unstable.cfg
===
--- installer/build/unstable.cfg(revision 38374)
+++ installer/build/unstable.cfg(working copy)
@@ -2,3 +2,6 @@
# builds and development builds.
d-i mirror/udeb/suite string uns
linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6_0.04_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6_0.04.dsc
linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6_0.04.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.16-2-s390-di_0.04_s390.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.16-2-s390-di_0.04_s390.udeb
scsi-core-modules-2.6.16-2-s3
On Friday 23 June 2006 18:42, Geert Stappers wrote:
> +# (ugly?) workaround for #372077
> +##x-org x-server/remove/warning/note seen
Would not work for real release.
I'm thinking of including the following in pkgsel though. Comments?
# Hack alert: workaround for #372077
db_fset x-server/remove/wa
partman-lvm_40_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-lvm_40.dsc
partman-lvm_40.tar.gz
partman-lvm_40_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
partman-auto-lvm_12_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-auto-lvm_12.dsc
partman-auto-lvm_12.tar.gz
partman-auto-lvm_12_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscri
Accepted:
partman-lvm_40.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_40.dsc
partman-lvm_40.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_40.tar.gz
partman-lvm_40_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_40_all.udeb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Thank you for you
Accepted:
partman-auto-lvm_12.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-auto-lvm/partman-auto-lvm_12.dsc
partman-auto-lvm_12.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-auto-lvm/partman-auto-lvm_12.tar.gz
partman-auto-lvm_12_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-auto-lvm/partman-auto-lvm_12_all.udeb
Announcing to debian-devel
Gary Fredrickson wrote:
> Everyone,
>
> Currently I am trying to fully automate an install of Debian and
> have to 2 issues early in the install process and a question about aptitude.
>
> The first issue below is with mirror country using ftp protocol. The section
> of
> the preseed
Your message dated Fri, 23 Jun 2006 11:02:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#375002: fixed in partman-auto-lvm 12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 07:14:50PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 23 June 2006 18:42, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > +# (ugly?) workaround for #372077
> > +##x-org x-server/remove/warning/note seen
> Would not work for real release.
> I'm thinking of including the following in pkgsel though. Comme
Hi,
just a quick question to the d-i team: looking at bug #248437, it seems
to contain no open partman-lvm issues, so I'm considering whether it
should be reassigned to yaboot or yaboot-installer, does this seem like
a reasonable idea and which of them should it be?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
os-prober_1.12_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
os-prober_1.12.dsc
os-prober_1.12.tar.gz
os-prober-udeb_1.12_i386.udeb
os-prober_1.12_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
partman-crypto_6_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-crypto_6.dsc
partman-crypto_6.tar.gz
partman-crypto-dm_6_all.udeb
partman-crypto-loop_6_all.udeb
partman-crypto_6_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
The next Debian Installer team opened meeting is scheduled for
Saturday June 24th 16:00 UTC. That is TOMORROW..:-)...or even today
for some parts of the world.
The meeting will happen on #debian-boot ON irc.debian.org, NOT, I
REPEAT, NOT on irc.freenode.net.
This meeting will mostly be centered a
Tamil characters are not shown properly :-(. What is the font used for Tamil (ta)? - Original Message From: Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: Debian Boot Cc: Debian i18n ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 6:31:13 AMSubject: [g-i] new screenshots availableDejavu 2.7 has made
Accepted:
os-prober-udeb_1.12_i386.udeb
to pool/main/o/os-prober/os-prober-udeb_1.12_i386.udeb
os-prober_1.12.dsc
to pool/main/o/os-prober/os-prober_1.12.dsc
os-prober_1.12.tar.gz
to pool/main/o/os-prober/os-prober_1.12.tar.gz
os-prober_1.12_i386.deb
to pool/main/o/os-prober/os-prober_1.12
linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6_0.75_m68k.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6_0.75.dsc
linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6_0.75.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.16-2-amiga-di_0.75_m68k.udeb
nic-shared-modules-2.6.16-2-amiga-di_0.75_m68k.udeb
ppp-modules-2.6.16-2
Hi all,
I've attached a patch which makes partman-lvm check the names given for
VG's and LV's before trying to create them. The checks have been derived
from reading the lvm2 sources and bug #254630.
The only thing that bothers me a bit is that the lvm tools use isalnum()
as part of their ch
Your message dated Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:33:53 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#259825: fixed in os-prober 1.12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:33:53 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#258623: fixed in os-prober 1.12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:33:53 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#259825: fixed in os-prober 1.12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Package: installation
Severity: normal
When I install Debian Sid for Sparc on my E250 and switch to 2.6.x kernel
the chars which I type to keyboard are wrong eg. when I type A-> 6 is displayed.
Removing /etc/console/boottime.kmap.gz solve the problem.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: test
Your message dated Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:33:53 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#258623: fixed in os-prober 1.12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Accepted:
partman-crypto-dm_6_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto-dm_6_all.udeb
partman-crypto-loop_6_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto-loop_6_all.udeb
partman-crypto_6.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto_6.dsc
partman-crypto_6.tar.gz
to p
Accepted:
crypto-modules-2.6.16-2-amiga-di_0.75_m68k.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6/crypto-modules-2.6.16-2-amiga-di_0.75_m68k.udeb
crypto-modules-2.6.16-2-atari-di_0.75_m68k.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6/crypto-modules-2.6.16-2-atari-di_0.75_m68k.udeb
crypto-mod
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 03:39:00PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> * Network configuration (CTC)
> Works fine.
> Wishlist:
> - Maybe we should remove the selected read device from the list when
> asking for the write device
Hmm, makes sense.
> - Maybe we could suggest default values (first available
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 11:04:06PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> The next Debian Installer team opened meeting is scheduled for
> Saturday June 24th 16:00 UTC. That is TOMORROW..:-)...or even today
> for some parts of the world.
So it will take place during the worldcup game germany vs. sweden
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 10:30:26PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> The last upload from console-data (20060609) was meant to allow more
> translations to go in, especially for the udeb package.
> As no special problems has been raised, I think we can probably hint
> the package for entering test
Your message dated Fri, 23 Jun 2006 23:54:20 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line LVM LVs should be mounted as /dev//
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Package: partman-lvm
Version: 40
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
The attached patch allows partman-lvm to check the names given for VG's
and LV's before trying to create them. The checks have been derived from
reading the lvm2 sources and bug #254630.
The only thing that bothers me a bit is th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Guggenberger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> So you want a binary nmu? if yes, you should send a mail to
>> debian-release@lists.debian.org asking for it and it should be done by
>> the buildd network without much hassle.
>>
> I have filed #3
23 червня 2006 о 15:18 -0700 Debian Bug Tracking System написав(-ла):
>
> grub and lilo currently support either way (/dev/VG/LV or
> /dev/mapper/VG-LV).
>
> However, initramfs-tools and the packages which use it (e.g. cryptsetup)
> only support /dev/mapper/VG-LV.
>
> I'm therefore closing thi
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 08:32:55PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Christian Guggenberger
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > a local rebuild yaboot binary successfully boots from CD.
> > Re-uploading yaboot should help fixing this issue.
>
> So you want a binary nmu? if yes, you should send a ma
Sorry you don't have the proper educational qualifications for this job. Sound
all too familiar? Then you need this:
http://doiop.com/dothis
i am terribly hungry, do you want to get some food later on?
* Frederik Schueler:
> -generic is odd and too long. I am considering to change the naming
> scheme completely, and call the flavours 2.6.x-y-amd64 and
> 2.6.x-y-em64t respectively.
Newer GCCs produce AMD64 code which is supposed to be closed to
optimal to what GCC can produce on EM64T. Does it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> submitter 338277 !
Bug#338277: plugin doesn't work with IBM JRE 1.4
Changed Bug submitter from Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Mike Hommey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> submitter 207804 !
Bug#207804: gtk2-engines-thingeramik: Does not use font from file o
60 matches
Mail list logo
