A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN.
There were no errors during the build process.
The new version of the manual has been uploaded successfully.
A log of the build is available at:
- http://people.debian.org/~fjp/d-i_manual/log/en.log
===
It is possible to u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I thought that since I said I'd do d-i testing Tue and Wed, and it's
now Sunday morning, that I'd best post a note saying I haven't
forgotten the project. I didn't get to d-i stuff until Thu due to
fighting with buggy software on another project.
I h
Package: debian-installer
Severity: minor
DESCRIPTION
After partitioning the disk and *not* selecting any of the paritions
to be root (/), the debian-installer shows a red screen to warn
about this.
PROBLEM
The selections:
go back
continue
are not different, but do the same th
Package: debian-installer
Severity: minor
Hi,
I used daily businesscard cd image version 20060517 on my i386 box.
When installing in gui mode with Czech or Slovak language, capital
letters with accents were displayed without accents. E.g. latin
capital letter C with caron was displayed only as l
Geert Stappers wrote:
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 11:42:06AM -0500, Karl Schmidt wrote:
I renamed this iso to debian-testing-amd64-netinst-5-13-06.iso
Why not use such a naming system so people can see which build the iso was
based on?
The full URL contains the build date.
Not really -
http:
WHAT UP?
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 04:34:28PM -0500, Karl Schmidt wrote:
> Geert Stappers wrote:
> >On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 11:42:06AM -0500, Karl Schmidt wrote:
> >
> >>I renamed this iso to debian-testing-amd64-netinst-5-13-06.iso
> >>
> >>Why not use such a naming system so people can see which build the i
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 04:17:50AM -0400, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
[ update of what is going on ]
> I have a few problem areas that I'll be addressing the with getting
> debian-powerpc installed. Part of the problem is documentation (I'll
> be submitting patches once I've figured out procedure
Accepted:
crypto-modules-2.6.16-1-amiga-di_0.73_m68k.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6/crypto-modules-2.6.16-1-amiga-di_0.73_m68k.udeb
crypto-modules-2.6.16-1-bvme6000-di_0.73_m68k.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6/crypto-modules-2.6.16-1-bvme6000-di_0.73_m68k.udeb
cryp
Accepted:
crypto-modules-2.6.16-1-amiga-di_0.72_m68k.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6/crypto-modules-2.6.16-1-amiga-di_0.72_m68k.udeb
crypto-modules-2.6.16-1-bvme6000-di_0.72_m68k.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6/crypto-modules-2.6.16-1-bvme6000-di_0.72_m68k.udeb
cryp
Accepted:
crypto-modules-2.6.16-1-s390-di_0.02_s390.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6/crypto-modules-2.6.16-1-s390-di_0.02_s390.udeb
dasd-modules-2.6.16-1-s390-di_0.02_s390.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6/dasd-modules-2.6.16-1-s390-di_0.02_s390.udeb
kernel-image-2.6.1
Accepted:
brltty-modules-2.4.27-2-386-di_1.10_i386.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386/brltty-modules-2.4.27-2-386-di_1.10_i386.udeb
brltty-modules-2.4.27-speakup-di_1.10_i386.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386/brltty-modules-2.4.27-speakup-di_1.10_i386.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.4
Accepted:
tasksel-data_2.45_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel-data_2.45_all.deb
tasksel_2.45.dsc
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.45.dsc
tasksel_2.45.tar.gz
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.45.tar.gz
tasksel_2.45_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.45_all.deb
Announcing to debian
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 07:47:16AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > If we want to prepare for this possibility, the one issue that the d-i
> > folks pointed out is that we'd probably want to refactor our meta
> > packages such that we could have both metapackages for the latest
> > 2.6.N and additiona
reassign 368294 partman
severity 368294 minor
thanks
> SUGGESTION
>
> To the compliment for the debian-installer, it can be used as a
> replacement of commercial tool (partiton magic e.g.). E.g when you buy
> a new hard drive and just want to paritiion all as needed.
>
> In these cases, there is
> I used daily businesscard cd image version 20060517 on my i386 box.
>
> When installing in gui mode with Czech or Slovak language, capital
> letters with accents were displayed without accents. E.g. latin
> capital letter C with caron was displayed only as latin capital letter
> C.
>
> This hap
We used to assign bugs somehow related to the raphical installer to
cdebconf-gtk-udeb, so i guess you can proceed with reassignment of this
bug too, which i suspect is related to the old GTKDFB 2.0.9 libraries
were currently using.
ciao
Attilio
Tiscali ADSL 4 Mega Flat
N
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 368300 cdebconf-gtk-udeb
Bug#368300: g-i not showing accents above capital letters
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `cdebconf-gtk-udeb'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 368329 cdebconf-gtk-udeb
Bug#368329: Graphical Installer report for Korean
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `cdebconf-gtk-udeb'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug trackin
reassign 368329 cdebconf-gtk-udeb
thanks
> But I noticed a few irregularities with the italics. As the attached
> image (partman_choose_partition_ko.png) shows, some Korean letters
> have their italics reversed (the letters that are underlined in red).
> The two lines above "Software RAID" should
joeyh,
In #295479 you mention remembering writing about a way to not eject
the CD at the end of the install. I think maybe you are remembering
#295476 which has been implemented and closed? What do you want to do
about #295479?
Thanks,
--
Matt Taggart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 07:19:11AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> Could you please get the font included for Kmer switched from KhmerOS to
> KhmerOSsys.
done:
- removed tarball from Alioth [1] and updated README file
- added "ttf-khmeros-udeb" to build/pkg-lists/gtk-common
- updated the wiki [2]
> He
hey,
Frans Pop assembled an informal BoF at DebConf to discuss cross-team
issues related to the kernel[1]. Attendees included:
Micah Anderson (micah)
Andreas Barth (aba)
dann frazier (dannf)
Joey Hess (joeyh)
Moritz Muehlenhoff (jmm)
Frans Pop (fjp)
Manoj Srivastava (manoj)
...a
Today I tried out the current debian installer "testing-i386-netinst"
(daily build) on my tiny network where I have a server running
apt-cacher. This means that the address is not one of the official
mirrors.
I could not figure out what I have to enter to use that apt-cacher
box. There was the opt
[ drop debian-release from CC ]
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 01:09:45PM -0500, dann frazier wrote:
> Kernel udeb creation process (possibly using k-p?)
> -
> If we build all of the *existing* udebs from a single source, we outgrow
> the limit of the Binar
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 01:09:45PM -0500, dann frazier wrote:
> Kernel udeb creation process (possibly using k-p?)
> -
> If we build all of the *existing* udebs from a single source, we outgrow
> the limit of the Binary: field in the control file.
Hu
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 10:10:51PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > Frans believes that sepearate source packages are more feasible for allowing
> > this type of shuffling
>
> If someone goes crazy, it may see this as GPL violation.
Ah, excellent point. The source producing some of the .udeb kerne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andreas J. Koenig) writes:
> Today I tried out the current debian installer "testing-i386-netinst"
> (daily build) on my tiny network where I have a server running
> apt-cacher. This means that the address is not one of the official
> mirrors.
>
> I could not figure out what I h
Hi,
Unfortunately I will not be able to start the integration of the graphical
installer for powerpc before the network shuts down here at Debconf.
I will probably be able to do it in two weeks time.
If someone else wants to give it a try in the mean time, feel free to do
so. But be aware that
Package: tasksel-data
Version: 2.45
Severity: normal
When running pbuilder update, I received the following:
Selecting previously deselected package tasksel-data.
(Reading database ... 12535 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking tasksel-data (from .../tasksel-data_2.45_all.deb) ..
Hi all,
I think there should be an easy way to change the DEBCONF_PRIORITY
setting from within d-i. You should not have to specify "expert" or
"DEBCONF_PRIORITY=..." on the CD-ROM boot prompt if you want to make the
change.
(I currently recommend to new Debian users to set
DEBCONF_PRIORITY=critic
Package: tasksel-data
Version: 2.45
Severity: grave
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I tried to update tasksel-data today together with several other
packages, including tasksel. The update failed, because tasksel-data
tried to overwrite
/usr/share/tasksel/debian-tasks.desc
whic
Hi
I prepared a tarball [1] containing the DFB backend for GTK+, backported
from GTK's CVS HEAD to 2.8.x, and a patchfile to compile GTK 2.8.17 with
the DFB backend.
The patchfile has been tested with GTK 2.8.17 from CVS, DirectFB 0.9.24
and and Cairo 1.1.6 built with DFB backend; produced GTK
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> severity 368408 serious
Bug#368408: tasksel-data: Tries to overwrite file from tasksel
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> severity 368407 serious
Bug#368407: Should conflict w
tasksel_2.46_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
tasksel_2.46.dsc
tasksel_2.46.tar.gz
tasksel_2.46_all.deb
tasksel-data_2.46_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
Quoting Jason Spiro ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi all,
>
> I think there should be an easy way to change the DEBCONF_PRIORITY
> setting from within d-i. You should not have to specify "expert" or
> "DEBCONF_PRIORITY=..." on the CD-ROM boot prompt if you want to make the
> change.
>
> (I currently rec
Accepted:
tasksel-data_2.46_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel-data_2.46_all.deb
tasksel_2.46.dsc
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.46.dsc
tasksel_2.46.tar.gz
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.46.tar.gz
tasksel_2.46_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.46_all.deb
Announcing to debian
Your message dated Sun, 21 May 2006 19:47:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368408: fixed in tasksel 2.46
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 21 May 2006 19:47:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368408: fixed in tasksel 2.46
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
39 matches
Mail list logo
