(second try as the stupid RBL and so-called "ant-spam system" used by
your ISP blocked my first answerplease use a real ISP)
Quoting Anthony Merhi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: installation-reports
>
> ->
> -> If you don't mind, please don't put my e-mail address on the web.
> ->
The Deb
Package: oldsys-preseed
Severity: important
Tags: d-i
Hello,
While trying to install Debian on my NSLU2 I found out with Martin
Michlmayr and Pepijn Oomen that the di will not be accessible if the
default gw is not set in the NSLU sysconf memory.
A method to write this info is to use a unslung i
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: Netinst CD
Image version: Netinst CD image for i386 from
www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer on Sun 19 Mar 06
Date: Sun 19 Mar 06 1450 UTC
Machine: Toshiba Qosmio G20
Processor: Intel Pentium M processor 1.86GHz
Memory: 512MB
Partitions: /dev/sda1 with
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
Boot method: beta2 businesscard CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/etch_di_beta2/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-businesscard.iso
Date: 2006-03-19 ~14:00 UTC
Machine: Assembled PC (Duron processor, integrated NIC)
Partitions: not re
luck and events happening beyond our control should always be judged by
personal intuitions and proceeded to create dummy buyers, fictitious
settlers who they created to come in and b
www.dukph.org/ht9/ is the store to drop those pounds
This was the noblest Roman of them all. All the conspirat
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 357792 busybox-udeb
Bug#357792: installation-reports: Fishy NIC prevents network install
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `busybox-udeb'.
> retitle 357792 Please enable CONFIG_FEATURE_IFCONFIG_HW
Bug#357792: installation-r
reassign 357792 busybox-udeb
retitle 357792 Please enable CONFIG_FEATURE_IFCONFIG_HW
tags 357792 + d-i
thanks
On Sunday 19 March 2006 16:13, Roland Mas wrote:
> It appears that the debian/config-udeb file in the busybox source
> package (1:1.01-4) contains the following:
> # CONFIG_FEATURE_IFCONFI
A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN.
There were no errors during the build process.
The new version of the manual has been uploaded successfully.
A log of the build is available at:
- http://people.debian.org/~fjp/d-i_manual/log/en.log
===
It is possible to u
network-console_1.3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
network-console_1.3.dsc
network-console_1.3.tar.gz
network-console_1.3_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
oldsys-preseed_0.2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
oldsys-preseed_0.2.dsc
oldsys-preseed_0.2.tar.gz
oldsys-preseed_0.2_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Hi,
I did a install of etch using the latest release installer. It went nicely. I
have two comments and 1 related question.
I installed and immediately upgraded to sid. (naughty me).
I think of using the latest installer as the best way to get to my preferred
desktop :).
2 Issues that I noticed
Accepted:
network-console_1.3.dsc
to pool/main/n/network-console/network-console_1.3.dsc
network-console_1.3.tar.gz
to pool/main/n/network-console/network-console_1.3.tar.gz
network-console_1.3_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/network-console/network-console_1.3_i386.udeb
Announcing to debian-devel-
Accepted:
oldsys-preseed_0.2.dsc
to pool/main/o/oldsys-preseed/oldsys-preseed_0.2.dsc
oldsys-preseed_0.2.tar.gz
to pool/main/o/oldsys-preseed/oldsys-preseed_0.2.tar.gz
oldsys-preseed_0.2_i386.udeb
to pool/main/o/oldsys-preseed/oldsys-preseed_0.2_i386.udeb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@l
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version: debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso, (beta 2) from Debian.org
website on 16 March
Date: 17 March 2006 ~ 15:00
Machine: Averatec AV3250H-01
Processor:
cpu family : 6
model : 10
model name : mobile AMD Athlon(tm) XP-M (L
A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN.
There were no errors during the build process.
The new version of the manual has been uploaded successfully.
A log of the build is available at:
- http://people.debian.org/~fjp/d-i_manual/log/en.log
===
It is possible to u
Hi Christian,
thanks for your email reply. i have some more detailed info for you, based on a third installation attempt following your advice.
i re-ran the same installation on the same box and diskettes as before, and took careful notes at step 16, the 'install grub boot loader' step.
step
> step 16 said that it had detected a list of OS's on my computer. but the
> list showed only one entry, 'Debian GNU/Linux (testing/unstable), which
> could refer to my existing hda3 'testing' OS or my newly installed hda4
> 'testing' OS. the entry in the list shows no device info, so i cannot
> te
> for instance,apart from display all packages, i can not fix this bug
> because anna use dependency tree. And if you look at partman and
> partman-ext3, there is no dependency relation. Fortunatly, they both
> have a 'standard' priority.
> So in lowmem2, if i display all packages, i can selec
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 02:20:03PM -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Package: installation-reports
>
> Boot method: debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
> Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/etch_di_beta2/i386/iso-cd/
> 14-Mar-2006 18:03 115M
>
> Partitions:
>
> Disk /dev/hda: 81.9 GB, 8
On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 04:32:07PM +, Mitchell Laks wrote something
like:
> Hi,
>
> I did a install of etch using the latest release installer. It went nicely. I
| have one comment and a related question.
>
| As soon as I rebooted into my system after the upgrade to sid I noticed that
> the e
On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 03:23:27PM +, Steve Westwood wrote:
> Boot method: Netinst CD
> Image version: Netinst CD image for i386 from
> www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer on Sun 19 Mar 06
> Date: Sun 19 Mar 06 1450 UTC
>
> Output of lspci and lspci -n: Not available
Mmm, unlikely. Recent v
Hi,
You are receiving this mail because you maintain a package that depends
on libnewt0.51.
This has now moved to 0.52 in upstream, and the versioned symbols patch
from Debian was applied
with the 0.52 tag, requiring that all packages depending on libnewt0.51
be rebuilt
to depend on libnewt
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 357654 normal
Bug#357654: [Etch beta2] Reboot fails with SATA drive on SATA150 Raid 2 Port
PCI Host Adapter
Severity set to `normal'.
> # I think it is more an user error then a technical problem
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
P
severity 357654 normal
# I think it is more an user error then a technical problem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am trying to build a small system with no moving parts. So I bought a
fanless mini-ITX board and a Compact Flash card, with an IDE to CF adapter.
Because the CF is only 256MB Debian etch will not install, so I put an old
1GB IDE disk onto the system, did a base install, removed things like th
Your message dated Sun, 19 Mar 2006 09:47:09 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#357787: fixed in oldsys-preseed 0.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 19 Mar 2006 19:19:26 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#357821: installation-reports
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 357569 installation-reports
Bug#357569: Installer expert mode does not allow to select software ("testing")
Warning: Unknown package 'installer'
Bug reassigned from package `installer' to `installation-reports'.
> reassign 357835 libopenal-dev
Hello,
Just saw that Paul Wise has made a preiminary package for ttf-khmeros
[1] on mentors.d.n .
The udeb should be generatable, too [2]
[1] http://mentors.debian.net/index.php
[2] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/ttf-khmeros/
--
Regards,
EddyP
=
Geert Stappers debian.org> writes:
> Please provide the output of
>
> uname -r
>
> from the computer we are talking about.
standard etch install linu-image-2.6.15-1-486
1) I Follow up. I restored the system to prior state, and rebooted multiple
times and now eth0 comes up. I dont know wha
On Monday 20 March 2006 00:38, Mitchell Laks wrote:
> 1) I Follow up. I restored the system to prior state, and rebooted
> multiple times and now eth0 comes up. I dont know what was wrong
> before...
> You can ignore it.
If you have multiple NICs in your system, you may be hit by somewhat
random
Samuel Thibault, le Mon 20 Mar 2006 00:54:25 +0100, a écrit :
> Could usbfs be please added to installer kernels?
Ah, sorry, it is already available, but as a module that doesn't get
auto-loaded. Is there a proper way of doing this?
Regards,
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I tested the latest (3.7.2-2) brltty package, USB doesn't seem to work,
because the usbfs filesystem is not available: syslog is filled with
brltty[2918]: USBFS not mounted.
brltty[2918]: Mounting USBFS: /etc/brltty/usbfs
brltty[2918]: USBFS mount error: /etc/brltty/usbfs: No such device
And
* Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-20 01:10]:
> Samuel Thibault, le Mon 20 Mar 2006 00:54:25 +0100, a écrit :
> > Could usbfs be please added to installer kernels?
> Ah, sorry, it is already available, but as a module that doesn't get
> auto-loaded. Is there a proper way of doing this?
On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 08:01:54PM +, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> You are receiving this mail because you maintain a package that depends
> on libnewt0.51.
> This has now moved to 0.52 in upstream, and the versioned symbols patch
> from Debian was applied
> with the 0.52 tag, requiring that
On 3/19/06, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With the exception of gnome-lokkit (previous binNMU using the old ".0.1"
> version numbering scheme), all of these packages should be binNMUable for
> the transition. I've just scheduled binNMUs across all architectures on the
> autobuilders
Quoting Eddy Petrişor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hello,
>
> Just saw that Paul Wise has made a preiminary package for ttf-khmeros
> [1] on mentors.d.n .
>
> The udeb should be generatable, too [2]
I uploaded it yesterday and it includes the udeb.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
37 matches
Mail list logo
