Quoting David Nusinow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi Joey and everyone, thanks for the cc. I'm willing to maintain
> discover in maintainance mode, but if Progeny plans to focus on
> discover2, I don't really see the point in keeping discover1 alive
> beyond the sarge release. The fix from Thomas Poind
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 08:56:05AM +0100, Thorsten Sauter wrote:
> * Sam Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-04 06:10]:
> [...]
> | What is the status of xfs, jfs and/or reiserfs support? I like the look
> | of xfs and jfs in particular (especially jfs which should work with 2.4
> | and 2.6 kern
Looks like David Nusinow's mail server doesn't like mine :
This is the Postfix program at host kheops.homeunix.org.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that the message returned
below could not be delivered to one or more destinations.
For further assistance, please send mail to
If you do so, ple
On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 08:46:58PM +1100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> When reading Thomas fix, I had this feeling, yes.
>
> However, the point is to remove this FTBFS bug from discover1 so that
> it can be part of the sarge release.
Definitely. This and the /cdrom mount bug.
> Thomas fix may be ca
[Branden Robinson, 2003-11-18]
> For example, it turns out a "di-discover" tool wasn't needed after all;
> it was possible to pass arguments to the existing discover utility to
> get output in the format desired by the d-i team.
>
> * discover/discover/Makefile.in
> discover/discover/didisc
[Martin Sjögren]
> Hysterical raisins, I guess. They should be removed. If someone wants to
> play with the other frontends, they can compile locally.
Also, removing the unused frontends will fix bug #218472. It is
probably a good idea.
(Oh, I wish cvs.debian.org would give me access to the CVS
[Branden Robinson]
> If Discover excites you as well, we cordially invite you to
> participate in Progeny's open development initiative.
Very good. Here is a patch for discover-data which would be applied
to the subversion repository.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2003/debian-boot-200310/m
On 6.XII.2003 at 15:39 Joey Hess wrote:
> Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> > The idea is that this script has to do the translation alone. In can
> > do it using debconf, gettext or by some other means. One script can
> > output many menu items and this makes imposible to assign to each of
> > them some
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 09:10:05PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 10:57:13PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> [...]
> > If you're interested in adding a new language to d-i in time for the
> > next beta, you should start translation now, or have already started, as
> > the one week
On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 04:10:54PM +0100, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 03:23:39PM +0100, Pierre Machard wrote:
> > > Does someone has a recent CVS snapshot? We could then provide PO files
> > > to translators.
> >
> > According to stat, my lastest snapshot was Wed Nov
On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 03:23:39PM +0100, Pierre Machard wrote:
> > Does someone has a recent CVS snapshot? We could then provide PO files
> > to translators.
>
> According to stat, my lastest snapshot was Wed Nov 19 18:56:13 2003.
Seems that I've got more recent snapshot.
2003-11-21 00:00:36.000
There apparently was some discussion between branden robinson and me
which did not get through to the list or at least the list archive due
to the break in. Branden proposed the following transition:
---
Well, here's what I'd personally like: :)
1) Get a good feedback cycle going between Proge
Moritz Lennert wrote:
> Here you go. I didn't know whether I should send all this to the bug
> address as well, so I'm sending it only to you.
>
> Tell me if you need naything else.
Thank you, that at least narrows it down somewhat:
Dec 7 12:07:14 (none) user.notice cdrom-detect: Searching for
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 09:11:43PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 11:24:56AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> Hi Joey and everyone, thanks for the cc. I'm willing to maintain
> discover in maintainance mode, but if Progeny plans to focus on
> discover
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 09:11:43PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 11:24:56AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> Hi Joey and everyone, thanks for the cc. I'm willing to maintain
> discover in maintainance mode, but if Progeny plans to focus on
> discover
Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> Well, here's what I'd personally like: :)
>
> 1) Get a good feedback cycle going between Progeny and debian-boot
>regarding discover2's suitability for debian-installer. The goal
>here is "feature-complete", not "bug-free".
> 2) Hand off maintenance off Discover
Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> One consequence of this is that we need discover2 udebs ASAP.
If you guys haven't noticed, there are bits in the Subversion
repository for building a udeb. I've successfully built a udeb
with it just now, but I have no idea if the resultant udeb is
Buongiorno dal sistema Posta Sicura di Elitel.
Il nostro sistema antivirus della posta in entrata ha trovato
un virus in un messaggio a voi indirizzato.
Il messaggio originale e' stato allegato dopo che il sistema ha eliminato le parti
infette.
Per ulteriori informazioni sul servizio Posta Sicur
[Gaudenz Steinlin] wrote:
> There apparently was some discussion between branden robinson and me
> which did not get through to the list or at least the list archive
> due to the break in. Branden proposed the following transition:
Hm, wish I had found this email earlier today. Then I would have
On Sun, 7 Dec 2003 18:17:41 +0100, Thomas Poindessous wrote:
> as I explained in the bts, the recent change in glibc and
> linux-kernel-headers has changed the way to handle inclusion of kernel
> headers.
>
> userland application ( like discover ) must copy headers they are using,
> they must not
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 222939 kernel-image-2.4.22-1-386
Bug#222939: installation-reports: d-i installation report: boots from cdrom, but then
fails to mount it
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `kernel-image-2.4.22-1-386'.
> retitle 222939 error
* Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-06 00:14]:
| Blah, JFS (as best I can determine) can't be resized, which makes it
| suboptimal for use with LVM (other than that I'm sure it's quite a lovely
| filesystem)
wrong. jfs is online resizable:
http://www10.software.ibm.com/developer/opensour
* Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-06 15:58]:
| On 5.XII.2003 at 22:55 Thorsten Sauter wrote:
| >
| > ... but what's your plan for archs/subarchs which are currently not
| > supported by libparted?
|
| They have to use some more traditional. Which architectures are not
| supported by
Am Son, den 07.12.2003 schrieb Petter Reinholdtsen um 19:45:
> [Gaudenz Steinlin] wrote:
> > There apparently was some discussion between branden robinson and me
> > which did not get through to the list or at least the list archive
> > due to the break in. Branden proposed the following transition
Am Son, den 07.12.2003 schrieb Doug Porter um 19:00:
> Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > One consequence of this is that we need discover2 udebs ASAP.
>
> If you guys haven't noticed, there are bits in the Subversion
> repository for building a udeb. I've successfully built a u
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 12:00:06AM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> David Nusinow was interested in it. If he still wants to take it I'm
> fine with that. I'm not particularly interested in maintaining a package
> that will be obsoleted soon, but if nobody is interested in it I will
> take it.
I'
Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> No, I didn't know.
>
> Let we take some decision before it is too late. We have two options:
>
> 1. `choices' uses debconf to translate some string and prints it
>
> 2. `choices' registers new questions, db_subst in them the variable
>parts and prints the names of th
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > IMO if we want to release sarge with discover2 for d-i we have to
> > release beta2 with discover2 (after that it's too late for this
> > change!)
>
> I agree with Joey, we should try to have everything ready just after
> beta2 is released.
One caveat: If someone is
Your message dated Mon, 8 Dec 2003 02:27:44 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line pointless
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Your message dated Mon, 8 Dec 2003 02:33:48 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line baeh
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
B
30 matches
Mail list logo
