Accepted:
cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.39_i386.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.39_i386.udeb
cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.39_i386.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.39_i386.udeb
cdebconf-priority_0.39_i386.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-priority_0.39_i386.udeb
cdebconf-s
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jul 2003 03:56:21 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#201791: fixed in cdebconf 0.39
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
* Alastair McKinstry
[...]
| (2) A reiserfsprogs udeb, (built from the reiserfsprogs package, I
| presume) that provides /sbin/mkfs.reiserfs. (I know that the reiserfs
| version is actually called mkreiserfs, but the name is important)
| This shoulde then depend on (1).
[...]
We are also look
Accepted:
kbd-chooser_0.24.dsc
to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_0.24.dsc
kbd-chooser_0.24.tar.gz
to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_0.24.tar.gz
kbd-chooser_0.24_i386.udeb
to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_0.24_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 203135
T
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
kbd-chooser_0.24_i386.udeb: package says priority is standard, override says extra.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and the pack
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jul 2003 07:17:29 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#203135: fixed in kbd-chooser 0.24
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
> hi folks
>
> i tried to make porting of busybox a little bit easier and add a little
> autoconf configure script which does currently only the arch and os
> detections. it don't support biarch modutils, so they won't realy work on
> ppc64/sparc64 machines.
>
> the current sources are available vi
> hi folks
>
> i tried to make porting of busybox a little bit easier and add a little
> autoconf configure script which does currently only the arch and os
> detections. it don't support biarch modutils, so they won't realy work on
> ppc64/sparc64 machines.
>
> the current sources are available vi
The Bottom of the email saysL
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
so add "-request" at the end of the prefix of the email address
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 14:08:39 +0200 (CEST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent a mail to Ken
Gilmour s
Hi,
here we go to add some discussion on the never ending topic of a
graphical installer. The current implementation of the gtk-frontend
for cdebconf is highly unsatisfactory. Because of the limited debconf
capabilities it is a mere question asker which is not what one would
expect from a graphica
Accepted:
usb-discover_0.02.dsc
to pool/main/u/usb-discover/usb-discover_0.02.dsc
usb-discover_0.02.tar.gz
to pool/main/u/usb-discover/usb-discover_0.02.tar.gz
usb-discover_0.02_all.udeb
to pool/main/u/usb-discover/usb-discover_0.02_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for yo
Hello
You are listed as the maintainer of the Debian package e2fsprogs. The
latest uploaded version (1.34-1) break the new Debian installation
debian-installer. The bugs are reported into BTS as #203056 and
#203058. Do you have time to look into these problems, and fix them
as soon as possible
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 12:43:28AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a new Gigabyte K7 Triton motherboard with a 700 mhz amd Duron CPU
> and 120 GB master and 40 GB slave Western Digital HDs. I've been trying to
> instal Debian on this system, but when I try to instal the base system
Accepted:
languagechooser_0.026.dsc
to pool/main/l/languagechooser/languagechooser_0.026.dsc
languagechooser_0.026.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/languagechooser/languagechooser_0.026.tar.gz
languagechooser_0.026_all.udeb
to pool/main/l/languagechooser/languagechooser_0.026_all.udeb
Announcing to [EM
Accepted:
autopartkit_0.54.dsc
to pool/main/a/autopartkit/autopartkit_0.54.dsc
autopartkit_0.54.tar.gz
to pool/main/a/autopartkit/autopartkit_0.54.tar.gz
autopartkit_0.54_i386.udeb
to pool/main/a/autopartkit/autopartkit_0.54_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 200640
T
Accepted:
cdrom-detect_0.26.dsc
to pool/main/c/cdrom-detect/cdrom-detect_0.26.dsc
cdrom-detect_0.26.tar.gz
to pool/main/c/cdrom-detect/cdrom-detect_0.26.tar.gz
cdrom-detect_0.26_all.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdrom-detect/cdrom-detect_0.26_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for yo
Accepted:
ddetect_0.35.dsc
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_0.35.dsc
ddetect_0.35.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_0.35.tar.gz
ethdetect_0.35_all.udeb
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ethdetect_0.35_all.udeb
hw-detect-full_0.35_all.udeb
to pool/main/d/ddetect/hw-detect-full_0.35_all.udeb
hw-detec
Accepted:
grub-installer_0.0.12.dsc
to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_0.0.12.dsc
grub-installer_0.0.12.tar.gz
to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_0.0.12.tar.gz
grub-installer_0.0.12_i386.udeb
to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_0.0.12_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMA
> When trying to display UTF-8 characters in the console, it seems
> that only the ASCII and ISO-8859-1 characters are displayed.
> Chinese and russian characters are represented as white squares.
> See the attached screenshot for an example.
The current version seem to run bterm and display also
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jul 2003 10:02:08 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#200640: fixed in autopartkit 0.54
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated 28 Jul 2003 16:24:17 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bu
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 12:40:53AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> When the changes are in place, we will encounter this error:
> make -C debianer install
> make: Entering an unknown directory
> make: Leaving an unknown directory
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/pool/debiansite/webwml/english/devel
Package: installation
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-28
Severity: normal
(sarge-i386-netinst.iso downloaded today)
I choosed to install with the "net" option. While giving the hostname, I
tried to give a domain name (by the way I did not found a way to give
it) by entering it in the hostn
Package: installation
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-28
Severity: normal
I downloaded the autobuild sarge-i386-netinst.iso today.
I choose installation in french language ; while "Partition a hard
drive" (it is not translated in French by the way), the message
Veuillez choisir l'un de ces
Package: installation
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-28
Severity: normal
[I downloaded autobuilded sarge-i386-netinst.iso today]
While installing the base system, the installer made a Segmentation
fault while downloading
http://ftp.uni-stuttgart.de/debian/pool/main/c/console-common/consol
mån 2003-07-28 klockan 22.15 skrev Robert CHERAMY:
> Package: installation
> Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-28
> Severity: normal
>
> (sarge-i386-netinst.iso downloaded today)
>
> I choosed to install with the "net" option. While giving the hostname, I
What do you mean "net" option?
> t
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003, Martin Sjögren wrote:
> > I choosed to install with the "net" option. While giving the hostname, I
> What do you mean "net" option?
In the boot prompt, I choosed net instead of the default installation :
boot: net
Thanks for fixing the bug so fast !
--
tibob
--
To UNSUBS
Accepted:
rootskel-locale_0.35_i386.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel-locale_0.35_i386.udeb
rootskel_0.35.dsc
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_0.35.dsc
rootskel_0.35.tar.gz
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_0.35.tar.gz
rootskel_0.35_i386.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_0.35_i386.u
Package: kbd-chooser
Version: 0.24 (not installed)
Severity: normal
Hi,
I did a install with current cvs. I chose french language ( [EMAIL PROTECTED]
set for debian-installer/locale ). But kbd-chooser preselected be-latin1
( Belgian ).
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Arc
Accepted:
main-menu_0.035.dsc
to pool/main/m/main-menu/main-menu_0.035.dsc
main-menu_0.035.tar.gz
to pool/main/m/main-menu/main-menu_0.035.tar.gz
main-menu_0.035_i386.udeb
to pool/main/m/main-menu/main-menu_0.035_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your contribution to
I want to make a customized debian distribution targeted to security. I
know Adamantix exist, but I want to make it a little easier.
My idea is that one be able to just insert the boot disk and the system
installs a minimum of packets, close ports, ask for NAT and transparent
proxy, install and co
[Martin Sjögren]
> + * Martin Sjögren
> + - Fix hostname corruption bug.
Should this change close #203245?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have downloaded unofficial sarge image.
But I cannot install debian system. The problem apears when I try to
load installer modules with ANNA. I have the following message:
"Retrieving module hw-detect failed with uncknown reason". Can anybody
help me?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE
tis 2003-07-29 klockan 00.14 skrev Petter Reinholdtsen:
> [Martin Sjögren]
> > + * Martin Sjögren
> > + - Fix hostname corruption bug.
>
> Should this change close #203245?
I don't know what should be done with all the 'installation' bugs. I
guess the proper thing is to clone&close, but that
34 matches
Mail list logo
