Package: di-utils-generic
Version: 0.18
Severity: grave
When remapping LVM devices, it insertes NULL as the device name:
% ./mapdevfs /dev/tjener_vg/usr_lv
/dev/(null)3
%
It should just pass on the LVM devpath without changing it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 08:45:16AM +0100, Mario Jeanmaire wrote:
> Madame, Monsieur,
> Jai une logiciel Linux Madrake qui fonctionne très bien sur lun de mes PC
> mais je voudrais passer sur mon portable linstallation se passe bien sauf
> au moment du re boot , la il démarre puis le code
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 06:50:37AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 17 Mar 2003, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>
> > obviously not, since you should ordinarily not build
> > libdebian-installer yourself, you should just install it into your
> > host system. libdebian-installer is a normal debia
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.34_i386.udeb: package says priority is standard, override says
optional.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct an
Accepted:
cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.34_i386.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.34_i386.udeb
cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.34_i386.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.34_i386.udeb
cdebconf-slang-udeb_0.34_i386.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-slang-udeb_0.34_i386.udeb
cdebco
This is a kickstart file I have used for Red Hat Linux 7.3.
Using this, I can install a RHL desktop on a Celeron (about) 900 in
under 15 minutes, with no interaction.
_
lang en_US
langsupport --default en_AU en_US
keyboard us
#Probe for Mouse
mo
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 06:51:49PM +0100, Martin Sjögren wrote:
[...]
> I think it's quite reasonable to have a libdebconf1-dev for the
> libdebconf1 package (which is still needed, no matter whether
> you've got debconf or cdebconf installed).
>
> Perhaps it's an idea to split libdebconf in libde
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Stephane Enten wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 06:50:37AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On 17 Mar 2003, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> >
> > > obviously not, since you should ordinarily not build
> > > libdebian-installer yourself, you should just install it into your
>
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 06:25:36PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Denis Barbier]
> >>> Maybe we could also add an en.po file to provide ISO-8859-1
> >> That is one option, but I believe it is better to specify that
> >> templates should use UTF-8. I'm not sure how much must change to make
>
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 09:23:00PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Stephane Enten wrote:
>
> > I've been able to build the floppy 'net' image without any trouble only
> > by installing the needed packages on the host system (and removing the
> > bogl stuff from the flop
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Stephane Enten wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 06:50:37AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I've been able to build the floppy 'net' image without any trouble only
>> by installing the needed packages on the host system (and removing the
>> bog
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 02:55:41PM +0100, Stephane Enten wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 09:23:00PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I have not yet found any way to make any packages from this source, and
> > that is why I think something is missing.
>
> You can to to the "libdebian-insta
Hallo John,
* John H. Robinson, IV [Sun, Mar 09 2003, 12:34:11AM]:
> i have built the USB 2.0 modules in. i have also built the pcmcia
> external modules.
...
We have a problem: something is broken with the modules in the
pcmcia-modules or with cardmgr. I think about reporting a grave bug
agains
Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We have a problem: something is broken with the modules in the
> pcmcia-modules or with cardmgr. I think about reporting a grave bug
> against pcmcia-cs because of this:
The source of your problems is that there are two sets of modules named
orinoco.o and
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, kuppermanfred wrote:
Hi,
i'm installing debian the third time now on my laptop from cd: cause of
bad video-card i had to restart four times.
cd boot prompt: bf24 vga=791 apm=on
ended in a fading colormonitor and system hangs up: tried rescue
cd boot prompt: rescbf24 vga=791
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 184994 + pending
Bug#184994: di-utils-generic: Floppy device is /dev/(null)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 10:09:44PM +0100, Martin Sjögren wrote:
> mån 2003-03-17 klockan 21.20 skrev Denis Barbier:
> > > Are they? db_subst foo/bar NAME "..." Will that be gobbled?
> >
> > With current implementation, yes.
>
> Then I think that should be changed too!
A workaround is to replace
hey hey hey
I am valiantly struggling with getting debian 3.0r1 onto a Compaq ML530 server
which has a Smart Array 431 RAID controller (2+1)
I have had Win2K and Redhat 7.x on this server in the past with no problems, but
I would prefer to go with Debian if possible. I am currently running RH7.2
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 10:35:25AM +1100, Brett Glasson wrote:
> I have tried both the "vanilla" and "compact" boot CD's with similar
> results. After trawling the net I have learnt that the '431 uses
> CPQARRAY.O, which should already be compiled into the kernel.
>
> Unfortunately, the con
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Stephane Enten wrote:
>
> You could change the apt-get command ran by the Makefile to get rid of
> the Dependancies check, but it would not be really clean.
I'm not yet that desperate;-)
> > While I could install the package from Sarge, it is actually the CVS
> > version
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Chris Tillman wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 02:55:41PM +0100, Stephane Enten wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 09:23:00PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > I have not yet found any way to make any packages from this source, and
> > > that is why I think somethin
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Mario Lang wrote:
> > What I want to do is to build all these packages, and then go on to
> > create bootable disks from the results.
>
> You do not need to do this. The whole idea of udeb packages
> is that they can reside in the archives, and you do not need to build
> the
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Emile van Bergen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 10:35:25AM +1100, Brett Glasson wrote:
>
> > I have tried both the "vanilla" and "compact" boot CD's with similar
> > results. After trawling the net I have learnt that the '431 uses
> > CPQARRAY.O, which should alre
23 matches
Mail list logo
