I tried udpkg -r findutils and the following are the changes it made to
/var/lib/dpkg/status
Its it supposed to work on post-installed systems ?
--- status Thu Feb 8 18:07:05 2001
+++ status.udpkgThu Feb 8 18:06:50 2001
@@ -10943,7 +10943,7 @@
base Gnome library functions.
Pa
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 08:55:11PM +1100, Glenn McGrath wrote:
> I tried udpkg -r findutils and the following are the changes it made to
> /var/lib/dpkg/status
>
> Its it supposed to work on post-installed systems ?
>
I guess not, it screwed my system too. Gotta run it only within a chroot
env.
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 01:45:07AM +0100, Dermot McGahon wrote:
>
> I would be very interested in the current state of play with regard to
> Debian and Reiser ? What can be done at the moment ? Are your patches
> the only ones ? Are they ready for production machines ???
Thanks for the VERY long
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 12:30:05PM +0200, Marc A . Volovic wrote:
>
> http://www.bard.org.il/~marc/linux/rfs/
>
Also, I would like as much feedback as possible about this set
of diskettes. It is ANYTHING but final, I will work more on it.
However, my time is very limited. PLEASE help with com
"Eray Ozkural (exa)" wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 08:55:11PM +1100, Glenn McGrath wrote:
> > I tried udpkg -r findutils and the following are the changes it made to
> > /var/lib/dpkg/status
> >
> > Its it supposed to work on post-installed systems ?
> >
>
> I guess not, it screwed my syste
Glenn McGrath wrote:
>
> I think the problem is in status_merge or status_read which effects all
> functions provided by udpkg.
>
Looks like a bug to me. Have any intentions to trace the bug and fix it? ;)
Regards,
--
Eray (exa) Ozkural
Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara
e-mail: [E
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 09:31:30AM -0800, David Whedon wrote:
> Marc,
>
> The new patch worked flawlessly. I committed everything except fr.BUGS. I
> wasn't sure what to do about fr.BUGS.
If this file is part of boot-floppies CVS tree, I should correct it. Is it so ?
What's the exact location
I never committed fr.BUGS, there is no need to actually commit it, just to fix
the problems. I didn't fix any of them either.
This message outlines the problems:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot-0102/msg00165.html
And yes, these are problems with boot-floppies CVS.
-David
Thu, Feb 08, 2001
On Wed Feb 07, 2001 at 11:10:32PM -0800, David Whedon wrote:
> That's very cool, the space savings look great.
>
> Would busybox upstream want to include udpkg? It's quite debian-specific. Just
> curious how that would be best handled.
Since busybox upstream is me, I'm happy to include debian
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Eric VB wrote:
> If this file is part of boot-floppies CVS tree, I should correct it. Is
> it so ? What's the exact location of the file ?
Sorry, I wasn't clear enough: fr.BUGS is a BUGS file, basically it
contains my remarks of the bugs I have seen with the printed version
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-boot
Module name:debian-installer
Changes by: joeyh 01/02/08 09:01:06
Modified files:
main-menu/debian: changelog
Log message:
* Really allow retrying of failed menu entries.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
Glenn McGrath wrote:
> The other thing is that the "official" udpkg will probably want to stay
> standalone, so changes to debian cvs udpkg may have to be manually fixed
> in busybox cvs as well to keep things in sync. Thats no big deal though
> i can do that.
I don't see why this would be necess
Erik Andersen wrote:
>
> Since busybox upstream is me, I'm happy to include debian specific stuff.
> The only concern I have is what happens when someone tries to use udpkg
> on their desktop...
Wouldn't it be good to separate udpkg data from dpkg data? So even if
a user uses it (he might want t
On Thu Feb 08, 2001 at 10:21:36PM +0200, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote:
> Erik Andersen wrote:
> >
> > Since busybox upstream is me, I'm happy to include debian specific stuff.
> > The only concern I have is what happens when someone tries to use udpkg
> > on their desktop...
>
> Wouldn't it be good
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 12:30:05PM +0200, Marc A . Volovic wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 01:45:07AM +0100, Dermot McGahon wrote:
> >
> > I would be very interested in the current state of play with regard to
> > Debian and Reiser ? What can be done at the moment ? Are your patches
> > the only
Erik Andersen wrote:
>
> On Thu Feb 08, 2001 at 10:21:36PM +0200, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote:
> > Erik Andersen wrote:
> > >
> > > Since busybox upstream is me, I'm happy to include debian specific stuff.
> > > The only concern I have is what happens when someone tries to use udpkg
> > > on their d
"Eray Ozkural (exa)" wrote:
>
> Glenn McGrath wrote:
> >
> > I think the problem is in status_merge or status_read which effects all
> > functions provided by udpkg.
> >
>
> Looks like a bug to me. Have any intentions to trace the bug and fix it? ;)
>
Yes, im on the job again now.
Glenn
--
> > Log message:
> > Initial import of new modconf development branch
>
> Randolph, can you explain what thisi s for, who might be using it?
I'm experimenting with better modconf support for woody b-f. On the road
right now; more details when I get back...
randolph
--
Debian Developer <[EM
Glenn McGrath wrote:
>
> "Eray Ozkural (exa)" wrote:
> >
> > Glenn McGrath wrote:
> > >
> > > I think the problem is in status_merge or status_read which effects all
> > > functions provided by udpkg.
> > >
> >
> > Looks like a bug to me. Have any intentions to trace the bug and fix it? ;)
> >
>
On Fri Feb 09, 2001 at 03:32:48PM +1100, Glenn McGrath wrote:
>
> Its a mongrel of a bug, data is going into the structs correctly and
> comming out changed...
>
> Im gunna start rewriting big chunks soon !
When things get changed behind your back, that usually means memory corruption.
I sugges
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-boot
Module name:debian-installer
Changes by: dwhedon 01/02/08 21:44:47
Modified files:
rootskel/debian: changelog rules
rootskel/src/etc: inittab
rootskel/src/etc/init.d: rcS
Log message:
put the 'null' back in inittab, it allows rc
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-boot
Module name:debian-installer
Changes by: dwhedon 01/02/08 21:47:42
Modified files:
build : Makefile
Log message:
remove /dev/log, thought I needed it, I don't, and tar doesn't like it anyway
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT
Package: installation
Version: ? debian 2.2r2 idepci images
I set up a debian mirror locally and was having a hard time installing from
it as I had the httpd bound to port 8080, and the port 8080 specified in
the installer. It turns out that the installer uses port 80 even when told
to use port
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-boot
Module name:debian-installer
Changes by: dwhedon 01/02/08 23:13:50
Modified files:
libd-i : Makefile d-i.c
libd-i/debian : changelog control rules
Added files:
libd-i/debian : dirs libd-i.postinst
Log message:
now we'r
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-boot
Module name:debian-installer
Changes by: dwhedon 01/02/08 23:31:25
debian-installer/rootskel/src/var
Update of /cvs/debian-boot/debian-installer/rootskel/src/var
In directory klecker:/tmp/cvs-serv1255/var
Log Message:
Directory /cvs/debian-boot/debian-in
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-boot
Module name:debian-installer
Changes by: dwhedon 01/02/08 23:31:35
debian-installer/rootskel/src/var/log
Update of /cvs/debian-boot/debian-installer/rootskel/src/var/log
In directory klecker:/tmp/cvs-serv1275/log
Log Message:
Directory /cvs/debian-boot/d
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-boot
Module name:debian-installer
Changes by: dwhedon 01/02/08 23:35:17
Modified files:
libd-i : Makefile
Log message:
now it actually works!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-boot
Module name:debian-installer
Changes by: dwhedon 01/02/08 23:43:00
Added files:
rootskel/src/var/log: messages
Log message:
place holder so 'tail' isn't sad when we boot up.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsu
Glenn McGrath wrote:
>
> Package: libmysqlclient9
> Package: giflib3g
> Package: gdict
> Package: libpgsql2
Now i see the conection, they are all both real and virtual packages,
i.e. each of the package names above are also in the Provides section of
another package.
Is that ok according to
29 matches
Mail list logo
