I'll try them out later this afternoon when I get back from classes.
I've finished installing all my systems, but I'll use the disks on the box
with Netgear, open up a shell and manually configure. It's just the module,
so me doing it outside the installation system shouldn't be a problem...
righ
Boot-floppies 2.2.18 for i386 was uploaded to samosa.
Porters, do your stuff. If source changes are needed for porters, I
can do my best to pretty quickly turn-around 2.2.19.
--
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
To: Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree with that. Anyhow, that seems to be what we're doing, so all
> should be well in 2.2r2.
[ ... ]
> I've tested the idepci and compact flavors, and they seem to work
> great.
Excellent! Sounds like everything is okay.
- Brian
--
T
Your message dated Mon, 20 Nov 2000 13:12:43 -0500 (EST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 31865 fixed
Bug#31865: [not working] Request for Language chooser on boot-floppies
Severity set to `fixed'.
> severity 40775 fixed
Bug#40775: [cvs-fixed] unclear wording in Sparc docs
Severity set to `fixed'.
> severity 49172 fixed
Bug#49172
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-boot
Module name:debian-installer
Changes by: aph 00/11/20 15:43:34
Modified files:
tools/udpkg: depends.c status.c udpkg.c udpkg.h
Added files:
tools/udpkg: udpkg_main.c
Log message:
Split main to seperate function, goal is to ma
Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> I think one of the design goals is that for the installed system, all
> files (excepting some config files and such) on the new system, at
> almost every point, are out of proper packages. The .udeb stuff is
> strictly (am I wrong?) for helping getting the installation medi
Sacramento, California
November 20, 2000
I have purchased the three CDs for Debian/GNU ver. 2.2. However, the
boot from the CD-rom to install Linux fails to recognize the SCSI card
on my computThe machine is equiped with an ADAPTEC Model AIC 7880
controller. The monitor screen states the ADAPTEC
Glenn McGrath wrote:
> Ive been thinking about hardware detection. I think hardware detection
> should be a dependency on the fetch method it applies to.
>
> e.g. the http/ftp/nfs retriever should depend on network and modem
> hardware detection.
>
> This way, if a network retriever is to be use
David Whedon wrote:
> My approach is similar, I have a tiny utility that converts the list
> of known hardware from the format that lib detect uses (a *.lst file)
> into a header file. My program (ddetect) includes said header file.
> ddetect makes calls into libdetect (which itself uses libisapn
David Whedon wrote:
> I made a new version of ddetect with a few changes, even if we don't
> go the libdetect way it was instructive to figure out how to make
> multiple .udebs conviennently.
>
> I'm now generating 2 udebs which each provide the virtual package
> [sound|ethernet]-card-detection:
Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > - documentation [UNCLAIMED}
> > Not started.
> I'm willing to help on this.
> How do I start ?
I think we need to hold off on this until we have something user-level to
document. Unless you want to help with the design docs.
--
see shy jo
--
To UN
Glenn wrote:
> Split main to seperate function, goal is to make libudpg.
> Removed dependence on shell command rm with internal function.
> replaced "struct packages_t" with "packages_t" via typdef (for style).
This grew the binary by 2k. I hope that's worth it, but I have my
doubts. If we just u
Joey Hess wrote:
> Glenn McGrath wrote:
> > I guess the card names are handy for the user if all doesnt go to plan,
> > i just left them out because the program didnt _need_ them, and they
> > take the most space.
>
> That's true, it is nice to be able to look at /proc/pci and figure out
> what
Joey Hess wrote:
> > The .udebs can be found at:
> > http://www.gordian.com/users/davidw/debian.html
>
> They all work for me except sndetect (ISA soundblaster) and mdmdetect
> (ISA modem).
Actually, snddetect -f does work, while -f doesn't make mdmdetect do any
better.
--
see shy jo
--
To
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-boot
Module name:debian-installer
Changes by: joeyh 00/11/20 17:27:26
Modified files:
doc: TODO
Log message:
status update
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTE
I skipped last week which was probably a bad idea. Too busy..
Done these past two weeks:
- dpkg 1.7.0 was released, so udebs can be built now
- Continuing development of udpkg has gotten all the important features
working.
- Pcidetect has been checked in. It is able to detect PCI NIC's and is
Joey Hess wrote:
>
> Glenn McGrath wrote:
> > Ive been thinking about hardware detection. I think hardware detection
> > should be a dependency on the fetch method it applies to.
> >
> > e.g. the http/ftp/nfs retriever should depend on network and modem
> > hardware detection.
> >
> > This way, i
On Mon Nov 20, 2000 at 05:28:44PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> - busybox integration [Erik Andersen]
> Not started. Busybox needs to build one or more .udebs.
> Probably more than one.
The first pass at busybox udebs will be ready tonight. How do I
upload th
roy hardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sacramento, California
> November 20, 2000
>
> I have purchased the three CDs for Debian/GNU ver. 2.2. However, the
> boot from the CD-rom to install Linux fails to recognize the SCSI card
> on my computThe machine is equiped with an ADAPTEC Model AIC 7880
Scott Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'll try them out later this afternoon when I get back from classes.
>
> I've finished installing all my systems, but I'll use the disks on the box
> with Netgear, open up a shell and manually configure. It's just the module,
> so me doing it outside
> > and left out the card names :-) )
>
> Can libdetect actually work with just pci id numbers, not names?
yea, we'd have to put in a placeholeder ("unknown") so any output
messages wouldn't have problems, but looking through libdetect (or at
least the parts I'm using) all it really needs it the
Erik Andersen wrote:
> On Mon Nov 20, 2000 at 05:28:44PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> > - busybox integration [Erik Andersen]
> > Not started. Busybox needs to build one or more .udebs.
> > Probably more than one.
>
> The first pass at busybox udebs will be re
Your message dated 21 Nov 2000 00:26:01 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed in boot-floppies 2.2.18
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated 21 Nov 2000 00:26:01 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed in boot-floppies 2.2.18
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated 21 Nov 2000 00:26:01 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed in boot-floppies 2.2.18
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated 21 Nov 2000 00:26:01 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed in boot-floppies 2.2.18
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated 21 Nov 2000 00:26:01 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed in boot-floppies 2.2.18
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated 21 Nov 2000 00:26:01 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed in boot-floppies 2.2.18
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated 21 Nov 2000 00:26:01 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed in boot-floppies 2.2.18
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated 21 Nov 2000 00:26:01 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed in boot-floppies 2.2.18
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated 21 Nov 2000 00:26:01 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed in boot-floppies 2.2.18
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated 21 Nov 2000 00:26:01 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed in boot-floppies 2.2.18
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated 21 Nov 2000 00:26:01 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed in boot-floppies 2.2.18
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated 21 Nov 2000 00:26:01 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed in boot-floppies 2.2.18
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated 21 Nov 2000 00:26:01 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed in boot-floppies 2.2.18
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
On Mon Nov 20, 2000 at 08:06:41PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> Erik Andersen wrote:
> > On Mon Nov 20, 2000 at 05:28:44PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > - busybox integration [Erik Andersen]
> > > Not started. Busybox needs to build one or more .udebs.
> > > Pro
37 matches
Mail list logo
