Hello,
I don't know if this was discussed before but have you seen Mandrakes
GPL-tools?
http://www.linux-mandrake.com/diskdrake/
http://www.linux-mandrake.com/harddrake/
http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/drakx.php3
IMHO Mandrake Linux is most easy to install for newbies.
Regards,
Max Moritz Sie
Hello!
Here is the patch that finally integrates LANGUAGE_CHOOSER to the
boot-floppies. _PLEASE_ test it. It almost built on my system (my disk is
too small), so it's mostly fine. A few build depends are probably missing
(libpng-dev comes to mind, but I'm not sure what exactly - I have too many
d
Package: boot-floppies
Severity: wishlist
Hello all,
After a discussion on IRC with a Debian User I propose that
there should be created a flavor of Debian boot-floppies that
include support for ISA PnP hardware. I suppose this could be
accomplished by adding executables
merge 76871 61886
thanks
Aigars Mahinovs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After a discussion on IRC with a Debian User I propose that
> there should be created a flavor of Debian boot-floppies that
> include support for ISA PnP hardware. I suppose this could be
> accomplish
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 76871 61886
Bug#61886: ISA PnP support in dbootstrap
Bug#76871: Request for isapnp on boot floppies
Merged 61886 76871.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs data
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-boot
Module name:debian-installer
Changes by: aph 00/11/12 11:49:40
Modified files:
doc: TODO
Log message:
just testing the new loginfo stuff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
"Andrew M.A. Cater" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I know space is tight on the boot disks - have we space for an additional
> two package listings in tasksel patterned after the Roxen entries i.e.
As of potato, the issue of adding task scripts is no longer either
constrained by the size of the b
Bastien CAZENAVE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> and the 'dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda1 bs=512 count=1' command issues the
> following error message:
>
> hda:hda: read_intr: error=0x59 { DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest
> Error }
> hda: read_intr: error=0x40 { UncorrectableError }, LBAsect=0, se
"techservice" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> we are currently looking at merging the debian m68K and
> LinuxRouterProject to create
>
>a mac based router box.
BTW, you'll probably interact better with the community if you follow
Andrew Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi All,
> sorry for posting this to this list as it isn't a
> development question but no one on the debian-user or
> debian-laptop lists seemed to know.
>
> I'm trying to build a kernel for my laptop (Sony Vaio
> F250) on my desktop machine. I tried t
Well, MIPS porters, I'm happy to apply this patch if it's
appropriate. Or you could hang onto it a bit until I branch Potato
out and we could apply it to the woody trunk.
--
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > 4. The current boot-system can be simplified and used for two
> > > purposes. The initial boot system as well as for a base for the future
> > > installation.
> On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Again I think that's disgusting. I don't w
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > > I claim this one. (btw, it is "Andersen" not "Anderson" :-). When the new
> > > dpkg-dev arrives, I will get an initial set of .udebs uploaded within a day or
> > > by Tuesday -- whichever comes later.
> >
> > Ok -- now, what i
Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Should I commit it to CVS? I tried to avoid changing anything that is run
> without USE_LANGUAGE_CHOOSER=true
Yes.
--
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
Your message dated 12 Nov 2000 15:17:10 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed in boot-floppies 2.2.17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated 12 Nov 2000 15:17:10 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed in boot-floppies 2.2.17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated 12 Nov 2000 15:17:10 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed in boot-floppies 2.2.17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated 12 Nov 2000 15:17:10 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed in boot-floppies 2.2.17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated 12 Nov 2000 15:17:10 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed in boot-floppies 2.2.17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated 12 Nov 2000 15:17:10 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed in boot-floppies 2.2.17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated 12 Nov 2000 15:17:10 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed in boot-floppies 2.2.17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated 12 Nov 2000 15:17:10 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed in boot-floppies 2.2.17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated 12 Nov 2000 15:17:10 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed in boot-floppies 2.2.17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated 12 Nov 2000 15:17:10 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed in boot-floppies 2.2.17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated 12 Nov 2000 15:17:10 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed in boot-floppies 2.2.17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated 12 Nov 2000 15:17:10 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed in boot-floppies 2.2.17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated 12 Nov 2000 15:17:10 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed in boot-floppies 2.2.17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated 12 Nov 2000 15:17:10 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed in boot-floppies 2.2.17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (2). I added libutf8_plug.so to $LIBRARIES (under "determining set of required
> libraries" in rootdisk.sh). I don't know if I should have, I thought this is
> needed for library reduction, but now during the build tar cries that it
> can't find the fi
Your message dated 12 Nov 2000 15:17:10 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed in boot-floppies 2.2.17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated 12 Nov 2000 15:17:10 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed in boot-floppies 2.2.17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated 12 Nov 2000 15:17:10 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed in boot-floppies 2.2.17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
John Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've managed to boot very easily over TFTP using yaboot. Your current
> install docs are unfinished (and they say so) on this process and the yaboot
> way was very easy.
>
> Someone's obviously managed to boot this somehow so I'm just wondering if
> you
Your message dated 12 Nov 2000 15:17:10 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed in boot-floppies 2.2.17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated 12 Nov 2000 15:17:10 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed in boot-floppies 2.2.17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated 12 Nov 2000 15:17:10 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed in boot-floppies 2.2.17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
"C.R de Groot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: boot-floppies
> Version: Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 potato
> architecture: i686
> model: no-name pII 350
> memory: 64MB
> scsi: none
> cd-rom: -ATAPI 36X
> -Philips 2/2/24 cdr/cdrw
> network card: ne2000 (Realtek 8019 ISA)
> pcmcia: none
Your message dated 12 Nov 2000 15:17:10 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed in boot-floppies 2.2.17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 75303 [i386, kernel] hang after MCA SCSI message
Bug#75303: problems with installation-system.
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database
Your message dated 12 Nov 2000 15:17:10 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed in boot-floppies 2.2.17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated 12 Nov 2000 15:17:10 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed in boot-floppies 2.2.17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated 12 Nov 2000 15:17:10 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed in boot-floppies 2.2.17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated 12 Nov 2000 15:17:10 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs closed in boot-floppies 2.2.17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
kapil sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I need the boot disk of debian to install it. Please
> let me know of the procedure.
Read the info at http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/
--
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
"David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello, i'm a new user of debian. I have a problem
> with the installation:
>
> When I reboot the system, with the cd (binary 1) after
> some messages appears this:
>
>
On Sun, Nov 12, 2000 at 03:29:49PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I: copying required libraries to root filesystem
> > tar: ./utilities/bogl/libutf8_plug.so: Cannot stat: No such file or directory
> > tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors
> >
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 74081 boot-floppies
Bug#74081: boot-floopies: leaves no kernel-image package
Bug reassigned from package `boot-floopies' to `boot-floppies'.
> severity 74081 wishlist
Bug#74081: boot-floopies: leaves no kernel-image package
Severity set to `w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl M. Hegbloom) writes:
> > "Adam" == Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Adam> Yes. More care should be given to the base set. We need to file bugs
> Adam> now, and agressively, against them.
>
> I have a better idea. Let's take out the "middle ma
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl M. Hegbloom) writes:
> I think it would be useful if we each kept a Notes. in CVS just
> to jot ideas that are part of general conjecture; ie, not sorted out
> to fit into another doc file yet, etc. This way we can look over
> each others notes and ideas. Sound Ok?
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think we need to get cvs commit messages from
> debian-boot/debian-installer cvs flowing to this mailing list (or some
> other list) again. I'm particularly interested in debian-installer
> commit of course; Aj and Randolph are hacking away on cdebconf an
"Costas Koulierakis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have recently downloaded the 2.2 release files.
>
> I read parts of the installation documentation but I could not locate some
> information about how to brake-up the distribution files into two CDs (ie.
> which files go where). Could you dire
51 matches
Mail list logo
