Package: base
Version: 2724
Severity: normal
Hello!
File /etc/environment isn't owned by any package and so it cannot be upgraded.
I think it should be included in base-files because it is installed with
boot-floppies during of system installation.
Thanks,
Peter.
-- System Inform
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Peter Novodvorsky wrote:
> Package: base
> Version: 20000724
> Severity: normal
>
> Hello!
>
> File /etc/environment isn't owned by any package and so it cannot be
> upgraded.
/etc/environment is a text file so it can be "upgraded&quo
On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 08:19:51PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > # mount -r -t vfat -o loop=/dev/loop0 rescue.bin /mnt
>
> What kind of a filesystem is rescue.bin on? Does it support bmap?
Don't know, it was created by dosfstool, i guess it is a vfat
On Sat, Jul 22, 2000 at 08:55:58AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 10:28:45AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > I posted a message about it some week ago, but i don't see it anywehere, so i
> > suppose it got lost.
> > The 64500 bug is still there, i don't know how to fix it, [..
John Beining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: boot-floppies
> Version: 2.2.16
> When booting with b-f 2.2.16 on a Toshiba Tecra 730CDT with 3COM PCMCIA network card
>3C589 I get a Modprobe error:
> (2X) kmod: runaway modprobe loop assumed and stopped.
This isn't really a bug. This is just
Package: boot-floppies
Version: 2.2.16
When booting with b-f 2.2.16 on a Toshiba Tecra
730CDT with 3COM PCMCIA network card 3C589 I get a Modprobe error:
(2X) kmod: runaway modprobe loop assumed and
stopped.
John Beining
On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 02:15:52PM +0200, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> I would suggest the following changes to Release notes:
>
> - converting the paragraph about problems with 2.2 kernels to an itemized
>list, as this would probably make the each problem more visible
I agree, it'll be done.
>
Hi all!
I can remember that about half a year ago this worked great with Polish font
(from console-data package, I guess). But when I try using it now, I only
get some ugly semigraphics instead of Polish national characters. I don't
know whether it's syslinux's code or the fonts that has changed.
Heh.
- Forwarded message from Michael Woodard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2000 08:45:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: Michael Woodard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Mounting CD-rom
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Y'know, I'm not going to spend the rest of my life
trying to figure out how to instal
On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 02:42:59PM +0200, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I can remember that about half a year ago this worked great with Polish font
[...]
> have gone wrong?
answering my question :-P
This was neither syslinux's nor font's fault. It was because of the
following piece of Ma
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 65810 libgwrapguile-dev
Bug#65810: libgwrapguil-dev: package has no extended description
Bug reassigned from package `libgwrapguile-dev' to `libgwrapguile-dev'.
> reassign 67042 apt
Bug#67042: Upgrade doesn't report REMOVE
Bug reassigned from
Michael Woodard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>At the prompt, I type in
>mount -t iso9660 -o ro /dev/hde /cdrom
>like the manual says, but it never works.
>...
>I know I have to mount from /dev/hde because
>that's where the cdrom is hooked up to.
Check your boot messages with something like
12 matches
Mail list logo
