Yes, that's correct. That's what happened. Is it a bug? Or is there a
workaround?
I have a related question about system RAM. How do I get the kernel to
recognise 4 Gb of RAM? Thanks!
--
N Syrotiuk | Mimas | University of Manchester | Manchester
On 20/06/12 21:21, Miguel Figueiredo
2 - modprobe - invalid option
Jun 19 23:27:10 main-menu[281]: (process:4374): modprobe: invalid option
-- 'l'
I found 2 occurrences on:
hw-detect/hw-detect.sh: [ "$(modprobe -l $1)" ] || return 1
busybox/modutils/modprobe-small.c:modprobe -l -t [ -a
...
--
Melhores cumprimentos/Best rega
Hi,
on the log you sent i found the following issues:
1 - udhcp - unknown parameter
Jun 19 23:26:48 main-menu[281]: (process:4263): udhcpc: has been called
with an unknown param: leasefail
Jun 19 23:26:48 main-menu[281]: (process:4263): Received SIGTERM
but installation continues, it's not f
Hi there,
I tried installing with a daily image from:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/current/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
Two files attached:
1. syslog.gz
2. lspci.out
Thanks!
On 19/06/12 22:58, Miguel Figueiredo wrote:
Hi,
can you take a look on the in
Hi there,
I'm having trouble installing wheezy on my i386. It fails with "the
debootstrap program exited with error return value 1."
Boot method: CD
Image version: Tried two images:
(1) debian-wheezy-DI-a1-i386-netinst.iso
(2) debian-wheezy-DI-a1-i386-CD-1.iso
D
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 21:50:44 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> * Linux kernel installation fails on old x86 processors (earlier
>than 686, or 686 without PAE) (#672611).
Should just be 686 without PAE I think, older CPUs would get the 486
flavour, not 686.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
D
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 09:50:44PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>Hi folks,
>
>I prepared the following draft, based on copy-pastes from:
> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/ReleaseAnnounce
>
>I took the liberty to replace “Wheezy” with “7.0” to match the previous
>announce, which mentioned “
Thank you Cyril and everyone.
In terms of presentation, this looks fine to me. In terms of content, I
added all issues from DebianInstaller/Today which I'm confident affect
alpha1 (that is, 1 issue).
On 2012-05-12 15:50, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi folks,
I prepared the following draft, based
Hi folks,
I prepared the following draft, based on copy-pastes from:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/ReleaseAnnounce
I took the liberty to replace “Wheezy” with “7.0” to match the previous
announce, which mentioned “6.0”. I have no strong (or bad) feeling about
this, just wanted to be co
9 matches
Mail list logo
