Simon McVittie, le Fri 12 Dec 2014 16:18:13 +, a écrit :
> On 12/12/14 15:26, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > Since apparently Conditions can't be used on targets, I came up with a
> > slightly different idea, using a service, which triggers the start of
> > getty on tty2-6 in absence of /usr/bin/dbus
On 12/12/14 15:26, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Since apparently Conditions can't be used on targets, I came up with a
> slightly different idea, using a service, which triggers the start of
> getty on tty2-6 in absence of /usr/bin/dbus-daemon.
Any reason not to prefer "Wants=getty@tty2.service ...
gett
Am 08.12.2014 um 01:12 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
> Michael Biebl, le Thu 04 Dec 2014 00:10:57 +0100, a écrit :
>> Am 03.12.2014 um 22:42 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
>>> Simon McVittie, le Sun 09 Nov 2014 20:43:36 +, a écrit :
I'm very tempted to say systemd in Debian should just make these 5
>
Michael Biebl, le Thu 04 Dec 2014 00:10:57 +0100, a écrit :
> Am 03.12.2014 um 22:42 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
> > Simon McVittie, le Sun 09 Nov 2014 20:43:36 +, a écrit :
> >> I'm very tempted to say systemd in Debian should just make these 5
> >> symlinks to preserve traditional Debian behavio
Am 03.12.2014 um 22:42 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
> Simon McVittie, le Sun 09 Nov 2014 20:43:36 +, a écrit :
>> I'm very tempted to say systemd in Debian should just make these 5
>> symlinks to preserve traditional Debian behaviour, at least for
>> jessie. It doesn't really even need to run syste
Simon McVittie, le Sun 09 Nov 2014 20:43:36 +, a écrit :
> I'm very tempted to say systemd in Debian should just make these 5
> symlinks to preserve traditional Debian behaviour, at least for
> jessie. It doesn't really even need to run systemctl, it can just use
> ln -s or whatever. People who
On 09/11/14 18:56, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Running for i in `seq 2 6` ; do systemctl enable
> getty@tty$i.service; done on a system without dbus, would
> statically enable a getty on vt2-6. So we could simply document
> this fact (in README.Debian, release notes etc).
I'm very tempted to say system
Am 09.11.2014 um 20:04 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
> Michael Biebl, le Sun 09 Nov 2014 19:56:40 +0100, a écrit :
>>
>> The alternative would be, to bump dbus to priority standard, so it's
>> installed by default (on new installations).
>
> It is already priority standard. That is not enough to make
Michael Biebl, le Sun 09 Nov 2014 19:56:40 +0100, a écrit :
> Running
> for i in `seq 2 6` ; do systemctl enable getty@tty$i.service; done
> on a system without dbus, would statically enable a getty on vt2-6.
I know, but I don't think we want to make the user have to do that.
> So we could simpl
Hi Samuel
Am 08.11.2014 um 12:54 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
> Hello,
>
> I've just checked this morning with the latest netboot, when installing
> just the base system with no task, dbus does not get installed, and thus
> vt2-6 do not have a login banner because systemd-logind needs dbus for
> that
Hello,
I've just checked this morning with the latest netboot, when installing
just the base system with no task, dbus does not get installed, and thus
vt2-6 do not have a login banner because systemd-logind needs dbus for
that.
In 758111, systemd was made to recommend dbus so that it works on sy
11 matches
Mail list logo
