Re: udeb unblock for libgcrypt11

2013-03-03 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 22:04 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > I've finally been able to perform some run-time tests with the -5 > udeb, which seems to work fine as far as assisted ciphered LVM is > confirmed. d-i ACK accordingly. Thanks; unblock-udeb added. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai

Re: udeb unblock for libgcrypt11

2013-03-03 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Andreas Metzler (24/02/2013): > On 2013-02-24 "Adam D. Barratt" wrote: > > libgcrypt11 1.5.0-4 contains a few small patches fixing RC bugs > > affecting other packages. I'm happy unblocking it, but can we add > > it to the unblock-udeb request list please? (Would a single mail > > with several re

Re: udeb unblock for libgcrypt11

2013-02-25 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Andreas Metzler (24/02/2013): > FYI I have uploaded 1.5.0-5 about 30 minutes after 1.5.0-4, it adds > another important fix. Looks like the upload happened at same time > as the mirror push, delaying ACCEPT, otherwise there should not have > been any duplicate work. Sorry. Just echoing from IRC:

Re: udeb unblock for libgcrypt11

2013-02-24 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2013-02-24 "Adam D. Barratt" wrote: > Sorry, me again. > libgcrypt11 1.5.0-4 contains a few small patches fixing RC bugs > affecting other packages. I'm happy unblocking it, but can we add it to > the unblock-udeb request list please? (Would a single mail with several > requests in be more hel

udeb unblock for libgcrypt11

2013-02-24 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, Sorry, me again. libgcrypt11 1.5.0-4 contains a few small patches fixing RC bugs affecting other packages. I'm happy unblocking it, but can we add it to the unblock-udeb request list please? (Would a single mail with several requests in be more helpful?) Thanks, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, e