Re: udeb's of dhcpcd, pump and ppp

2000-12-19 Thread Joey Hess
David Whedon wrote: > I made udebs of dhcpcd (turns out to be smaller than pump, and I've heard is > better behaved), pump and ppp. If anyone wants to play with them, (or critisize > them in case I made an error) the patches can be found at bugs #79841 (pump), > #79851 (dhcpcd), and #79864 (ppp).

Re: udeb's of dhcpcd, pump and ppp

2000-12-17 Thread David Whedon
Nothing has been ruled out at this point, the only reason I didn't udeb it is that (and I looked at dhcp_2.0pl5-1, didn't know v3 existed, thanks): 1. it looked a lot bigger than either pump or dhcpcd 2. it didn't work for me right out of the box under Linux for me like dhcpcd did (though it did

Re: udeb's of dhcpcd, pump and ppp

2000-12-17 Thread Karl M. Hegbloom
I found that the DHCP v3 `dhclient' works much better than the `dhcpcd' does. There's a package in "project/experimental" that I've been using. I bet it will be ready for the main distro by release day anyway, so why not just use it? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a su

Re: udeb's of dhcpcd, pump and ppp

2000-12-17 Thread Randolph Chung
In reference to a message from David Whedon, dated Dec 17: > I made udebs of dhcpcd (turns out to be smaller than pump, and I've heard is > better behaved), pump and ppp. If anyone wants to play with them, (or critisize > them in case I made an error) the patches can be found at bugs #79841 (pump

udeb's of dhcpcd, pump and ppp

2000-12-17 Thread David Whedon
I made udebs of dhcpcd (turns out to be smaller than pump, and I've heard is better behaved), pump and ppp. If anyone wants to play with them, (or critisize them in case I made an error) the patches can be found at bugs #79841 (pump), #79851 (dhcpcd), and #79864 (ppp). I haven't gotten a chance t