* Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > Let us say a new version of libc or libdirectfb enters sid, and
> > udebs will be built accordingly. Since they do not have a SONAME
> > version, all dependant udebs will be broken because anna will pull
> > in the new version of the library via libc-udeb or
> > li
[Sebastian Ley]
> What actually happens if there is an ABI change in one of the library
> udebs? Let us say a new version of libc or libdirectfb enters sid, and
> udebs will be built accordingly. Since they do not have a SONAME
> version, all dependant udebs will be broken because anna will pull in
* Sebastian Ley wrote:
> As for now no udebs actually have their soname number as part of the
> package name. It is libc-udeb, discover-udeb...
Hm, no one talking to me, so I just reply myself...:
What actually happens if there is an ABI change in one of the library
udebs? Let us say a new versi
Hello,
I wonder if we need soname versions in library udebs as proposed in
Junichi Uekawas library packaging guide [1]. There will never be some
kind of upgrading of udebs, and the udebs should be in a consistent
state when they are built.
As for now no udebs actually have their soname number as
4 matches
Mail list logo
