Hi all,
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Chris Hofstaedtler (2020-05-03):
> > * Cyril Brulebois :
> > > Michael Biebl (2017-10-24):
> >
> > > > But there is one complication: I noticed that eject in util-linux
> > > > currently linux only.
> > > >
> > > > If we made the udeb linux-any, how
Hello,
Chris Hofstaedtler, le dim. 03 mai 2020 23:31:23 +0200, a ecrit:
> * Cyril Brulebois :
> > While non-Linux issues aren't usually a blocker, I wouldn't welcome a
> > gratuitous breakage there. I'll let porters comment first.
>
> We didn't hear anything from porters since 2017.
I actually h
Hi,
Chris Hofstaedtler (2020-05-03):
> * Cyril Brulebois :
> > Michael Biebl (2017-10-24):
>
> > > But there is one complication: I noticed that eject in util-linux
> > > currently linux only.
> > >
> > > If we made the udeb linux-any, how would this affect the installer?
> >
> > It might me
Hi,
* Cyril Brulebois :
> Michael Biebl (2017-10-24):
> > But there is one complication: I noticed that eject in util-linux
> > currently linux only.
> >
> > If we made the udeb linux-any, how would this affect the installer?
>
> It might mean a regression on kfreebsd-* (I don't see an eject-
Michael Biebl (2017-10-26):
> The debconf templates are of course translated. What I meant is that I
> don't ship /usr/share/locale in the eject udeb.
I think I misread gettext as debconf when I received your mail, and I
really should have read it more thoroughly before replying.
> Or is it impo
Am 26.10.2017 um 16:59 schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
> Hi,
>
> Michael Biebl (2017-10-24):
>> It's actually smaller then the old eject-udeb as I didn't include the
>> gettext translations.
>
> Why? OK this was late and maybe I wasn't clear on IRC, but keeping the
> i18n + l10n part working is importa
Hi,
Michael Biebl (2017-10-24):
> It's actually smaller then the old eject-udeb as I didn't include the
> gettext translations.
Why? OK this was late and maybe I wasn't clear on IRC, but keeping the
i18n + l10n part working is important.
> But there is one complication: I noticed that eject in
Hi KiBi,
thanks for your reply.
I've pushed a wip branch to
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/pkg-util-linux.git/log/?h=wip/eject
The resulting binary packages look fine afaics, especially the udeb:
$ dpkg --info eject-udeb_2.30.2-0.1_amd64.udeb
new Debian package, version 2.0.
siz
Hi,
Michael Biebl (2017-10-16):
> I've CCed debian-boot for this specific issue
Thanks.
> On Mon, 1 Jun 2015 18:28:03 +0200 Andreas Henriksson
> wrote:
>
> > * udeb
> >
> > The eject package builds the eject-udeb package, which util-linux
> > will need to provide. (Another option would b
I've CCed debian-boot for this specific issue
On Mon, 1 Jun 2015 18:28:03 +0200 Andreas Henriksson
wrote:
> * udeb
>
> The eject package builds the eject-udeb package, which util-linux
> will need to provide. (Another option would be to ship it inside
> util-linux-udeb but that would prob
10 matches
Mail list logo
